Cargando…

Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study

In response to the rapidly evolving of SARS-CoV-2 infection, numerous serological tests have been developed but their sensitivity and specificity are unclear. We collected serum samples of patients and health-care professionals to assess the accuracy of chemiluminescent (CLIA) and two lateral flow i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pecoraro, Valentina, Cassetti, Tiziana, Meacci, Marisa, Gargiulo, Raffaele, Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria, Mussini, Cristina, Vecchi, Elena, Pecorari, Monica, Gagliotti, Carlo, Trenti, Tommaso, Sarti, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04224-3
_version_ 1783676815650324480
author Pecoraro, Valentina
Cassetti, Tiziana
Meacci, Marisa
Gargiulo, Raffaele
Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
Mussini, Cristina
Vecchi, Elena
Pecorari, Monica
Gagliotti, Carlo
Trenti, Tommaso
Sarti, Mario
author_facet Pecoraro, Valentina
Cassetti, Tiziana
Meacci, Marisa
Gargiulo, Raffaele
Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
Mussini, Cristina
Vecchi, Elena
Pecorari, Monica
Gagliotti, Carlo
Trenti, Tommaso
Sarti, Mario
author_sort Pecoraro, Valentina
collection PubMed
description In response to the rapidly evolving of SARS-CoV-2 infection, numerous serological tests have been developed but their sensitivity and specificity are unclear. We collected serum samples of patients and health-care professionals to assess the accuracy of chemiluminescent (CLIA) and two lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFIA) to determine IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 virus. We calculated the φ correlation for qualitative results and test accuracy, adopting the following case definition: either real-time-PCR positivity or serological positivity with at least two different tests. We analyzed 259 samples, obtaining strong correlation between CLIA and both LFIA for IgG (φ=0.9), and moderate correlation for IgM (φ=0.6). For patients, the sensitivity was suboptimal for all methods (CLIA 81%, LFIA A 85%, LFIA B 78%), while it was poor in asymptomatic health-care workers (CLIA 50%, LFIA A 50%, LFIA B 33%). Overall, CLIA is more sensitive and specific for the determination of both IgG and IgM, whilst both LFIA methods reported good sensitivity and specificity for IgG, but scarce sensitivity for the IgM determination. The determination of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG is useful to detect infection 6 days from symptom onset. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-021-04224-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80360112021-04-12 Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study Pecoraro, Valentina Cassetti, Tiziana Meacci, Marisa Gargiulo, Raffaele Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria Mussini, Cristina Vecchi, Elena Pecorari, Monica Gagliotti, Carlo Trenti, Tommaso Sarti, Mario Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article In response to the rapidly evolving of SARS-CoV-2 infection, numerous serological tests have been developed but their sensitivity and specificity are unclear. We collected serum samples of patients and health-care professionals to assess the accuracy of chemiluminescent (CLIA) and two lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFIA) to determine IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 virus. We calculated the φ correlation for qualitative results and test accuracy, adopting the following case definition: either real-time-PCR positivity or serological positivity with at least two different tests. We analyzed 259 samples, obtaining strong correlation between CLIA and both LFIA for IgG (φ=0.9), and moderate correlation for IgM (φ=0.6). For patients, the sensitivity was suboptimal for all methods (CLIA 81%, LFIA A 85%, LFIA B 78%), while it was poor in asymptomatic health-care workers (CLIA 50%, LFIA A 50%, LFIA B 33%). Overall, CLIA is more sensitive and specific for the determination of both IgG and IgM, whilst both LFIA methods reported good sensitivity and specificity for IgG, but scarce sensitivity for the IgM determination. The determination of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG is useful to detect infection 6 days from symptom onset. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-021-04224-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8036011/ /pubmed/33839972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04224-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pecoraro, Valentina
Cassetti, Tiziana
Meacci, Marisa
Gargiulo, Raffaele
Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
Mussini, Cristina
Vecchi, Elena
Pecorari, Monica
Gagliotti, Carlo
Trenti, Tommaso
Sarti, Mario
Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study
title Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study
title_full Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study
title_short Accuracy of the serological detection of IgG and IgM to SARS-Cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study
title_sort accuracy of the serological detection of igg and igm to sars-cov-2: a prospective, cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04224-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pecorarovalentina accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT cassettitiziana accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT meaccimarisa accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT gargiuloraffaele accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT capobianchimariarosaria accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT mussinicristina accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT vecchielena accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT pecorarimonica accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT gagliotticarlo accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT trentitommaso accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT sartimario accuracyoftheserologicaldetectionofiggandigmtosarscov2aprospectivecrosssectionalstudy