Cargando…

Value of preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: A PRISMA compliant meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common gynecologic carcinoma in developed countries and accounts for nearly 5% of carcinoma cases and more than 2% of deaths due to female carcinomas worldwide. Because of this reported risk, it is very important to diagnose and stage it accuratel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong, Xiaozhen, Wu, Xiaofen, Zhang, Qiaohong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025434
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common gynecologic carcinoma in developed countries and accounts for nearly 5% of carcinoma cases and more than 2% of deaths due to female carcinomas worldwide. Because of this reported risk, it is very important to diagnose and stage it accurately. Therefore, we investigated the staging accuracy of EC with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Due to a lack of studies on the use of CEUS in staging EC, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and CBM for studies on CEUS in EC diagnosis. Our search keywords were “ultrasonic angiography,” “endometrial neoplasms,” and their synonyms. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 4 tabular data were extracted. Quality evaluation was performed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) scale. Statistical analysis was done with Stata version 15.1. A random effect model was selected to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was obtained, and the area under the curve was calculated. RESULT: Fifteen studies with 685 patients were included in this quantitative synthesis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of CEUS in the diagnosis of EC was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, .76–.85), .90 (.87–.92), 8 (5.8–11.1), .21 (.16–.28), and 38 (22–67), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.93 (.90–.95). CONCLUSION: CEUS has a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of EC. It can be considered as an effective and feasible method for EC staging.