Cargando…
Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the abilit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025424 |
_version_ | 1783676833960558592 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Kaiyong Xie, Qiao Nie, Jieping Deng, Jieqing |
author_facet | Liang, Kaiyong Xie, Qiao Nie, Jieping Deng, Jieqing |
author_sort | Liang, Kaiyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the ability of diabetic patients to inject themselves with insulin. METHODS: After follow-up, a total of 120 patients with diabetes mellitus were included. These patients needed insulin therapy depending on their condition and had not previously learned insulin injection. We randomly divided them into the intervention group (60 cases) and the control group (60 cases). The control group was trained on insulin injection before being discharged according to the traditional method, and the intervention group was trained based on an improved simulation tool. All participants were trained as individuals or groups. Finally, we evaluated the learning effects of both groups. RESULTS: The time spent at the training stage in the intervention group was shorter than the control group. We found that after applying simulation devices to mimic operations, the learning time for patients was reduced. The first subcutaneous injection success rate was 73.33% in the intervention group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group by 46.67%. The score of the first subcutaneous injection and pre-discharge score in the test group was significantly higher than that of the control group. One month later, the score for injection skills in the 2 groups was higher than that before discharge, and the score in the trial group was still higher than that in the control group. The incidence of subcutaneous fat hyperplasia in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (3.3% vs 15%, P < .05). Moreover, the incidence of hypoglycemia (16.7% vs. 26.7%) was higher in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .184). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: After applying simulation tools plus operating video and guideline as the standard procedure to train diabetic patients on insulin injection, all patients had a good grasp of using the insulin injection technique. This education method is safe, efficient, and worth promoting worldly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80360902021-04-13 Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools Liang, Kaiyong Xie, Qiao Nie, Jieping Deng, Jieqing Medicine (Baltimore) 4300 BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the ability of diabetic patients to inject themselves with insulin. METHODS: After follow-up, a total of 120 patients with diabetes mellitus were included. These patients needed insulin therapy depending on their condition and had not previously learned insulin injection. We randomly divided them into the intervention group (60 cases) and the control group (60 cases). The control group was trained on insulin injection before being discharged according to the traditional method, and the intervention group was trained based on an improved simulation tool. All participants were trained as individuals or groups. Finally, we evaluated the learning effects of both groups. RESULTS: The time spent at the training stage in the intervention group was shorter than the control group. We found that after applying simulation devices to mimic operations, the learning time for patients was reduced. The first subcutaneous injection success rate was 73.33% in the intervention group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group by 46.67%. The score of the first subcutaneous injection and pre-discharge score in the test group was significantly higher than that of the control group. One month later, the score for injection skills in the 2 groups was higher than that before discharge, and the score in the trial group was still higher than that in the control group. The incidence of subcutaneous fat hyperplasia in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (3.3% vs 15%, P < .05). Moreover, the incidence of hypoglycemia (16.7% vs. 26.7%) was higher in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .184). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: After applying simulation tools plus operating video and guideline as the standard procedure to train diabetic patients on insulin injection, all patients had a good grasp of using the insulin injection technique. This education method is safe, efficient, and worth promoting worldly. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8036090/ /pubmed/33832143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025424 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 4300 Liang, Kaiyong Xie, Qiao Nie, Jieping Deng, Jieqing Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools |
title | Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools |
title_full | Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools |
title_fullStr | Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools |
title_short | Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools |
title_sort | study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools |
topic | 4300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangkaiyong studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools AT xieqiao studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools AT niejieping studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools AT dengjieqing studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools |