Cargando…

Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools

BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the abilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Kaiyong, Xie, Qiao, Nie, Jieping, Deng, Jieqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025424
_version_ 1783676833960558592
author Liang, Kaiyong
Xie, Qiao
Nie, Jieping
Deng, Jieqing
author_facet Liang, Kaiyong
Xie, Qiao
Nie, Jieping
Deng, Jieqing
author_sort Liang, Kaiyong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the ability of diabetic patients to inject themselves with insulin. METHODS: After follow-up, a total of 120 patients with diabetes mellitus were included. These patients needed insulin therapy depending on their condition and had not previously learned insulin injection. We randomly divided them into the intervention group (60 cases) and the control group (60 cases). The control group was trained on insulin injection before being discharged according to the traditional method, and the intervention group was trained based on an improved simulation tool. All participants were trained as individuals or groups. Finally, we evaluated the learning effects of both groups. RESULTS: The time spent at the training stage in the intervention group was shorter than the control group. We found that after applying simulation devices to mimic operations, the learning time for patients was reduced. The first subcutaneous injection success rate was 73.33% in the intervention group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group by 46.67%. The score of the first subcutaneous injection and pre-discharge score in the test group was significantly higher than that of the control group. One month later, the score for injection skills in the 2 groups was higher than that before discharge, and the score in the trial group was still higher than that in the control group. The incidence of subcutaneous fat hyperplasia in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (3.3% vs 15%, P < .05). Moreover, the incidence of hypoglycemia (16.7% vs. 26.7%) was higher in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .184). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: After applying simulation tools plus operating video and guideline as the standard procedure to train diabetic patients on insulin injection, all patients had a good grasp of using the insulin injection technique. This education method is safe, efficient, and worth promoting worldly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80360902021-04-13 Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools Liang, Kaiyong Xie, Qiao Nie, Jieping Deng, Jieqing Medicine (Baltimore) 4300 BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the ability of diabetic patients to inject themselves with insulin. METHODS: After follow-up, a total of 120 patients with diabetes mellitus were included. These patients needed insulin therapy depending on their condition and had not previously learned insulin injection. We randomly divided them into the intervention group (60 cases) and the control group (60 cases). The control group was trained on insulin injection before being discharged according to the traditional method, and the intervention group was trained based on an improved simulation tool. All participants were trained as individuals or groups. Finally, we evaluated the learning effects of both groups. RESULTS: The time spent at the training stage in the intervention group was shorter than the control group. We found that after applying simulation devices to mimic operations, the learning time for patients was reduced. The first subcutaneous injection success rate was 73.33% in the intervention group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group by 46.67%. The score of the first subcutaneous injection and pre-discharge score in the test group was significantly higher than that of the control group. One month later, the score for injection skills in the 2 groups was higher than that before discharge, and the score in the trial group was still higher than that in the control group. The incidence of subcutaneous fat hyperplasia in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (3.3% vs 15%, P < .05). Moreover, the incidence of hypoglycemia (16.7% vs. 26.7%) was higher in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .184). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: After applying simulation tools plus operating video and guideline as the standard procedure to train diabetic patients on insulin injection, all patients had a good grasp of using the insulin injection technique. This education method is safe, efficient, and worth promoting worldly. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8036090/ /pubmed/33832143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025424 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4300
Liang, Kaiyong
Xie, Qiao
Nie, Jieping
Deng, Jieqing
Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
title Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
title_full Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
title_fullStr Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
title_full_unstemmed Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
title_short Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
title_sort study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
topic 4300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33832143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025424
work_keys_str_mv AT liangkaiyong studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools
AT xieqiao studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools
AT niejieping studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools
AT dengjieqing studyontheeffectofeducationforinsulininjectionindiabeticpatientswithnewsimulationtools