Cargando…
Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network
PURPOSE: Visual reading of (18)F-florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) scans is used in the diagnostic process of patients with cognitive disorders for assessment of amyloid-ß (Aß) depositions. However, this can be time-consuming, and difficult in case of borderline amyloid pathology. Compu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05006-3 |
_version_ | 1783676853960048640 |
---|---|
author | de Vries, Bart Marius Golla, Sandeep S. V. Ebenau, Jarith Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Timmers, Tessa Heeman, Fiona Cysouw, Matthijs C. F. van Berckel, Bart N. M. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Yaqub, Maqsood Boellaard, Ronald |
author_facet | de Vries, Bart Marius Golla, Sandeep S. V. Ebenau, Jarith Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Timmers, Tessa Heeman, Fiona Cysouw, Matthijs C. F. van Berckel, Bart N. M. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Yaqub, Maqsood Boellaard, Ronald |
author_sort | de Vries, Bart Marius |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Visual reading of (18)F-florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) scans is used in the diagnostic process of patients with cognitive disorders for assessment of amyloid-ß (Aß) depositions. However, this can be time-consuming, and difficult in case of borderline amyloid pathology. Computer-aided pattern recognition can be helpful in this process but needs to be validated. The aim of this work was to develop, train, validate and test a convolutional neural network (CNN) for discriminating between Aß negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir PET scans in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). METHODS: (18)F-florbetapir PET images were acquired and visually assessed. The SCD cohort consisted of 133 patients from the SCIENCe cohort and 22 patients from the ADNI database. From the SCIENCe cohort, standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images were computed. From the ADNI database, SUVR images were extracted. 2D CNNs (axial, coronal and sagittal) were built to capture features of the scans. The SCIENCe scans were randomly divided into training and validation set (5-fold cross-validation), and the ADNI scans were used as test set. Performance was evaluated based on average accuracy, sensitivity and specificity from the cross-validation. Next, the best performing CNN was evaluated on the test set. RESULTS: The sagittal 2D-CNN classified the SCIENCe scans with the highest average accuracy of 99% ± 2 (SD), sensitivity of 97% ± 7 and specificity of 100%. The ADNI scans were classified with a 95% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity. CONCLUSION: The 2D-CNN algorithm can classify Aß negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir PET scans with high performance in SCD patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80361832021-04-27 Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network de Vries, Bart Marius Golla, Sandeep S. V. Ebenau, Jarith Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Timmers, Tessa Heeman, Fiona Cysouw, Matthijs C. F. van Berckel, Bart N. M. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Yaqub, Maqsood Boellaard, Ronald Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Visual reading of (18)F-florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) scans is used in the diagnostic process of patients with cognitive disorders for assessment of amyloid-ß (Aß) depositions. However, this can be time-consuming, and difficult in case of borderline amyloid pathology. Computer-aided pattern recognition can be helpful in this process but needs to be validated. The aim of this work was to develop, train, validate and test a convolutional neural network (CNN) for discriminating between Aß negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir PET scans in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). METHODS: (18)F-florbetapir PET images were acquired and visually assessed. The SCD cohort consisted of 133 patients from the SCIENCe cohort and 22 patients from the ADNI database. From the SCIENCe cohort, standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images were computed. From the ADNI database, SUVR images were extracted. 2D CNNs (axial, coronal and sagittal) were built to capture features of the scans. The SCIENCe scans were randomly divided into training and validation set (5-fold cross-validation), and the ADNI scans were used as test set. Performance was evaluated based on average accuracy, sensitivity and specificity from the cross-validation. Next, the best performing CNN was evaluated on the test set. RESULTS: The sagittal 2D-CNN classified the SCIENCe scans with the highest average accuracy of 99% ± 2 (SD), sensitivity of 97% ± 7 and specificity of 100%. The ADNI scans were classified with a 95% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity. CONCLUSION: The 2D-CNN algorithm can classify Aß negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir PET scans with high performance in SCD patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8036183/ /pubmed/32875431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05006-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Vries, Bart Marius Golla, Sandeep S. V. Ebenau, Jarith Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Timmers, Tessa Heeman, Fiona Cysouw, Matthijs C. F. van Berckel, Bart N. M. van der Flier, Wiesje M. Yaqub, Maqsood Boellaard, Ronald Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network |
title | Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network |
title_full | Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network |
title_fullStr | Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network |
title_short | Classification of negative and positive (18)F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network |
title_sort | classification of negative and positive (18)f-florbetapir brain pet studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05006-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devriesbartmarius classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT gollasandeepsv classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT ebenaujarith classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT verfailliesandercj classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT timmerstessa classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT heemanfiona classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT cysouwmatthijscf classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT vanberckelbartnm classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT vanderflierwiesjem classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT yaqubmaqsood classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT boellaardronald classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT classificationofnegativeandpositive18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudiesinsubjectivecognitivedeclinepatientsusingaconvolutionalneuralnetwork |