Cargando…
Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine
Clinical forensic assessments of injuries’ life-threatening danger may have an impact on the legal aftermath following a violent assault. The pursuit of evidence-based guidelines should ensure a user-independent and reproducible forensic practice. However, does it? The aim of this study was to evalu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02485-9 |
_version_ | 1783676857496895488 |
---|---|
author | Jakobsen, Lykke Schrøder Christensen, Marie Toftdahl Lundemose, Sissel Banner Munkholm, Julie Bugge, Anne Birgitte Dyhre Lynnerup, Niels Banner, Jytte |
author_facet | Jakobsen, Lykke Schrøder Christensen, Marie Toftdahl Lundemose, Sissel Banner Munkholm, Julie Bugge, Anne Birgitte Dyhre Lynnerup, Niels Banner, Jytte |
author_sort | Jakobsen, Lykke Schrøder |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical forensic assessments of injuries’ life-threatening danger may have an impact on the legal aftermath following a violent assault. The pursuit of evidence-based guidelines should ensure a user-independent and reproducible forensic practice. However, does it? The aim of this study was to evaluate the forensic life-threatening danger assessments after a protocol implementation in 2016. The evaluation concerned usability and reproducibility of the protocol, and its influence on assessment severity. We analyzed the level of inter- and intra-rater agreement using 169 blinded, prior-protocol cases that were reassessed by two forensic specialists. We compared assessment made the year before and after protocol implementation (n = 262), and the forensic specialists’ reassessments with the prior-protocol cases’ original assessments (n = 169). Whether to make an assessment, the levels of agreement varied between weak agreement (inter-rater, Κ = 0.43; assessor 1, Κ = 0.57) and strong agreement (assessor 2, Κ = 0.90). Regarding severity, the levels of agreement varied between strong agreement (inter-rater, Κ = 0.87; assessor 1: Κ = 0.90) and almost perfect agreement (assessor 2: Κ = 0.94). The assessments were statistically significant redistributed after the implementation (chi-square test: p < 0.0001). The proportion of cases assessed as having not been in life-threatening danger increased from 9 to 43%, and moderate severity assessments decreased from 55 to 23%. Of the moderate severity assessments, 55% were reassessed as having not been in life-threatening danger. The protocol ensured independent and reproducible assessments when the forensic specialists agreed on making one. The protocol resulted in less severe assessments. Future studies should examine the reliability of the protocol and its consequences for legal aftermaths. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-020-02485-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80362022021-04-27 Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine Jakobsen, Lykke Schrøder Christensen, Marie Toftdahl Lundemose, Sissel Banner Munkholm, Julie Bugge, Anne Birgitte Dyhre Lynnerup, Niels Banner, Jytte Int J Legal Med Original Article Clinical forensic assessments of injuries’ life-threatening danger may have an impact on the legal aftermath following a violent assault. The pursuit of evidence-based guidelines should ensure a user-independent and reproducible forensic practice. However, does it? The aim of this study was to evaluate the forensic life-threatening danger assessments after a protocol implementation in 2016. The evaluation concerned usability and reproducibility of the protocol, and its influence on assessment severity. We analyzed the level of inter- and intra-rater agreement using 169 blinded, prior-protocol cases that were reassessed by two forensic specialists. We compared assessment made the year before and after protocol implementation (n = 262), and the forensic specialists’ reassessments with the prior-protocol cases’ original assessments (n = 169). Whether to make an assessment, the levels of agreement varied between weak agreement (inter-rater, Κ = 0.43; assessor 1, Κ = 0.57) and strong agreement (assessor 2, Κ = 0.90). Regarding severity, the levels of agreement varied between strong agreement (inter-rater, Κ = 0.87; assessor 1: Κ = 0.90) and almost perfect agreement (assessor 2: Κ = 0.94). The assessments were statistically significant redistributed after the implementation (chi-square test: p < 0.0001). The proportion of cases assessed as having not been in life-threatening danger increased from 9 to 43%, and moderate severity assessments decreased from 55 to 23%. Of the moderate severity assessments, 55% were reassessed as having not been in life-threatening danger. The protocol ensured independent and reproducible assessments when the forensic specialists agreed on making one. The protocol resulted in less severe assessments. Future studies should examine the reliability of the protocol and its consequences for legal aftermaths. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-020-02485-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8036202/ /pubmed/33410922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02485-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jakobsen, Lykke Schrøder Christensen, Marie Toftdahl Lundemose, Sissel Banner Munkholm, Julie Bugge, Anne Birgitte Dyhre Lynnerup, Niels Banner, Jytte Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine |
title | Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine |
title_full | Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine |
title_fullStr | Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine |
title_short | Life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in Eastern Danish clinical forensic medicine |
title_sort | life-threatening danger assessments of penetrating injuries in eastern danish clinical forensic medicine |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02485-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jakobsenlykkeschrøder lifethreateningdangerassessmentsofpenetratinginjuriesineasterndanishclinicalforensicmedicine AT christensenmarietoftdahl lifethreateningdangerassessmentsofpenetratinginjuriesineasterndanishclinicalforensicmedicine AT lundemosesisselbanner lifethreateningdangerassessmentsofpenetratinginjuriesineasterndanishclinicalforensicmedicine AT munkholmjulie lifethreateningdangerassessmentsofpenetratinginjuriesineasterndanishclinicalforensicmedicine AT buggeannebirgittedyhre lifethreateningdangerassessmentsofpenetratinginjuriesineasterndanishclinicalforensicmedicine AT lynnerupniels lifethreateningdangerassessmentsofpenetratinginjuriesineasterndanishclinicalforensicmedicine AT bannerjytte lifethreateningdangerassessmentsofpenetratinginjuriesineasterndanishclinicalforensicmedicine |