Cargando…

PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: In recent years, the clinical availability of scanners for integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled the practical potential of multimodal, combined metabolic-receptor, anatomical, and functional imaging to be explored. The present systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evangelista, Laura, Zattoni, Fabio, Cassarino, Gianluca, Artioli, Paolo, Cecchin, Diego, dal Moro, Fabrizio, Zucchetta, Pietro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05025-0
_version_ 1783676861490921472
author Evangelista, Laura
Zattoni, Fabio
Cassarino, Gianluca
Artioli, Paolo
Cecchin, Diego
dal Moro, Fabrizio
Zucchetta, Pietro
author_facet Evangelista, Laura
Zattoni, Fabio
Cassarino, Gianluca
Artioli, Paolo
Cecchin, Diego
dal Moro, Fabrizio
Zucchetta, Pietro
author_sort Evangelista, Laura
collection PubMed
description AIM: In recent years, the clinical availability of scanners for integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled the practical potential of multimodal, combined metabolic-receptor, anatomical, and functional imaging to be explored. The present systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the diagnostic information provided by PET/MRI in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in three different databases. The terms used were “choline” or “prostate-specific membrane antigen - PSMA” AND “prostate cancer” or “prostate” AND “PET/MRI” or “PET MRI” or “PET-MRI” or “positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.” All relevant records identified were combined, and the full texts were retrieved. Reports were excluded if (1) they did not consider hybrid PET/MRI; or (2) the sample size was < 10 patients; or (3) the raw data were not enough to enable the completion of a 2 × 2 contingency table. RESULTS: Fifty articles were eligible for systematic review, and 23 for meta-analysis. The pooled data concerned 2104 patients. Initial disease staging was the main indication for PET/MRI in 24 studies. Radiolabeled PSMA was the tracer most frequently used. In primary tumors, the pooled sensitivity for the patient-based analysis was 94.9%. At restaging, the pooled detection rate was 80.9% and was higher for radiolabeled PSMA than for choline (81.8% and 77.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI proved highly sensitive in detecting primary PCa, with a high detection rate for recurrent disease, particularly when radiolabeled PSMA was used. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-05025-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80362222021-04-27 PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Evangelista, Laura Zattoni, Fabio Cassarino, Gianluca Artioli, Paolo Cecchin, Diego dal Moro, Fabrizio Zucchetta, Pietro Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Review Article AIM: In recent years, the clinical availability of scanners for integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled the practical potential of multimodal, combined metabolic-receptor, anatomical, and functional imaging to be explored. The present systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the diagnostic information provided by PET/MRI in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in three different databases. The terms used were “choline” or “prostate-specific membrane antigen - PSMA” AND “prostate cancer” or “prostate” AND “PET/MRI” or “PET MRI” or “PET-MRI” or “positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.” All relevant records identified were combined, and the full texts were retrieved. Reports were excluded if (1) they did not consider hybrid PET/MRI; or (2) the sample size was < 10 patients; or (3) the raw data were not enough to enable the completion of a 2 × 2 contingency table. RESULTS: Fifty articles were eligible for systematic review, and 23 for meta-analysis. The pooled data concerned 2104 patients. Initial disease staging was the main indication for PET/MRI in 24 studies. Radiolabeled PSMA was the tracer most frequently used. In primary tumors, the pooled sensitivity for the patient-based analysis was 94.9%. At restaging, the pooled detection rate was 80.9% and was higher for radiolabeled PSMA than for choline (81.8% and 77.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI proved highly sensitive in detecting primary PCa, with a high detection rate for recurrent disease, particularly when radiolabeled PSMA was used. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-05025-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8036222/ /pubmed/32901351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05025-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Evangelista, Laura
Zattoni, Fabio
Cassarino, Gianluca
Artioli, Paolo
Cecchin, Diego
dal Moro, Fabrizio
Zucchetta, Pietro
PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort pet/mri in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05025-0
work_keys_str_mv AT evangelistalaura petmriinprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zattonifabio petmriinprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cassarinogianluca petmriinprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT artiolipaolo petmriinprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cecchindiego petmriinprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dalmorofabrizio petmriinprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zucchettapietro petmriinprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis