Cargando…

Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET

PURPOSE: Almost all radiolabellings of antibodies with (89)Zr currently employ the hexadentate chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). However, DFO can lead to unwanted uptake of (89)Zr in bones due to instability of the resulting metal complex. DFO*-NCS and the squaramide ester of DFO, DFOSq, are novel ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chomet, Marion, Schreurs, Maxime, Bolijn, Maria J., Verlaan, Mariska, Beaino, Wissam, Brown, Kari, Poot, Alex J., Windhorst, Albert D., Gill, Herman, Marik, Jan, Williams, Simon, Cowell, Joseph, Gasser, Gilles, Mindt, Thomas L., van Dongen, Guus A. M. S, Vugts, Danielle J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05002-7
_version_ 1783676862198710272
author Chomet, Marion
Schreurs, Maxime
Bolijn, Maria J.
Verlaan, Mariska
Beaino, Wissam
Brown, Kari
Poot, Alex J.
Windhorst, Albert D.
Gill, Herman
Marik, Jan
Williams, Simon
Cowell, Joseph
Gasser, Gilles
Mindt, Thomas L.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S
Vugts, Danielle J.
author_facet Chomet, Marion
Schreurs, Maxime
Bolijn, Maria J.
Verlaan, Mariska
Beaino, Wissam
Brown, Kari
Poot, Alex J.
Windhorst, Albert D.
Gill, Herman
Marik, Jan
Williams, Simon
Cowell, Joseph
Gasser, Gilles
Mindt, Thomas L.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S
Vugts, Danielle J.
author_sort Chomet, Marion
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Almost all radiolabellings of antibodies with (89)Zr currently employ the hexadentate chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). However, DFO can lead to unwanted uptake of (89)Zr in bones due to instability of the resulting metal complex. DFO*-NCS and the squaramide ester of DFO, DFOSq, are novel analogues that gave more stable (89)Zr complexes than DFO in pilot experiments. Here, we directly compare these linker-chelator systems to identify optimal immuno-PET reagents. METHODS: Cetuximab, trastuzumab and B12 (non-binding control antibody) were labelled with (89)Zr via DFO*-NCS, DFOSq, DFO-NCS or DFO*Sq. Stability in vitro was compared at 37 °C in serum (7 days), in formulation solution (24 h ± chelator challenges) and in vivo with N87 and A431 tumour-bearing mice. Finally, to demonstrate the practical benefit of more stable complexation for the accurate detection of bone metastases, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-NCS and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-NCS-labelled trastuzumab and B12 were evaluated in a bone metastasis mouse model where BT-474 breast cancer cells were injected intratibially. RESULTS: [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-NCS-trastuzumab and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*Sq-trastuzumab showed excellent stability in vitro, superior to their [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO counterparts under all conditions. While tumour uptake was similar for all conjugates, bone uptake was lower for DFO* conjugates. Lower bone uptake for DFO* conjugates was confirmed using a second xenograft model: A431 combined with cetuximab. Finally, in the intratibial BT-474 bone metastasis model, the DFO* conjugates provided superior detection of tumour-specific signal over the DFO conjugates. CONCLUSION: DFO*-mAb conjugates provide lower bone uptake than their DFO analogues; thus, DFO* is a superior candidate for preclinical and clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-05002-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80362252021-04-27 Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET Chomet, Marion Schreurs, Maxime Bolijn, Maria J. Verlaan, Mariska Beaino, Wissam Brown, Kari Poot, Alex J. Windhorst, Albert D. Gill, Herman Marik, Jan Williams, Simon Cowell, Joseph Gasser, Gilles Mindt, Thomas L. van Dongen, Guus A. M. S Vugts, Danielle J. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Almost all radiolabellings of antibodies with (89)Zr currently employ the hexadentate chelator desferrioxamine (DFO). However, DFO can lead to unwanted uptake of (89)Zr in bones due to instability of the resulting metal complex. DFO*-NCS and the squaramide ester of DFO, DFOSq, are novel analogues that gave more stable (89)Zr complexes than DFO in pilot experiments. Here, we directly compare these linker-chelator systems to identify optimal immuno-PET reagents. METHODS: Cetuximab, trastuzumab and B12 (non-binding control antibody) were labelled with (89)Zr via DFO*-NCS, DFOSq, DFO-NCS or DFO*Sq. Stability in vitro was compared at 37 °C in serum (7 days), in formulation solution (24 h ± chelator challenges) and in vivo with N87 and A431 tumour-bearing mice. Finally, to demonstrate the practical benefit of more stable complexation for the accurate detection of bone metastases, [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-NCS and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-NCS-labelled trastuzumab and B12 were evaluated in a bone metastasis mouse model where BT-474 breast cancer cells were injected intratibially. RESULTS: [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*-NCS-trastuzumab and [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO*Sq-trastuzumab showed excellent stability in vitro, superior to their [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO counterparts under all conditions. While tumour uptake was similar for all conjugates, bone uptake was lower for DFO* conjugates. Lower bone uptake for DFO* conjugates was confirmed using a second xenograft model: A431 combined with cetuximab. Finally, in the intratibial BT-474 bone metastasis model, the DFO* conjugates provided superior detection of tumour-specific signal over the DFO conjugates. CONCLUSION: DFO*-mAb conjugates provide lower bone uptake than their DFO analogues; thus, DFO* is a superior candidate for preclinical and clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-05002-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8036225/ /pubmed/32889615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05002-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chomet, Marion
Schreurs, Maxime
Bolijn, Maria J.
Verlaan, Mariska
Beaino, Wissam
Brown, Kari
Poot, Alex J.
Windhorst, Albert D.
Gill, Herman
Marik, Jan
Williams, Simon
Cowell, Joseph
Gasser, Gilles
Mindt, Thomas L.
van Dongen, Guus A. M. S
Vugts, Danielle J.
Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_full Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_fullStr Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_short Head-to-head comparison of DFO* and DFO chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)Zr-immuno-PET
title_sort head-to-head comparison of dfo* and dfo chelators: selection of the best candidate for clinical (89)zr-immuno-pet
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05002-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chometmarion headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT schreursmaxime headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT bolijnmariaj headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT verlaanmariska headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT beainowissam headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT brownkari headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT pootalexj headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT windhorstalbertd headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT gillherman headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT marikjan headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT williamssimon headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT cowelljoseph headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT gassergilles headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT mindtthomasl headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT vandongenguusams headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet
AT vugtsdaniellej headtoheadcomparisonofdfoanddfochelatorsselectionofthebestcandidateforclinical89zrimmunopet