Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Advanced Renal or Urothelial Cell Carcinoma and Concomitant Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibition plays a pivotal role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The association of chronic kidney disease with these tumors is well established. However, to what extent kidney failure modifies the efficacy or the toxicity profiles of checkpoint inhibitors has been poorly investigated. In this paper, we reviewed the files of 85 patients with renal cell carcinoma and 41 with urothelial cancer who had received checkpoint inhibitor treatment, and found that 37.6% and 41.5% had evidence of chronic kidney disease, respectively. We found that neither general treatment-related nor immune-related adverse events differed between patients with normal or impaired renal function. Using a multivariate analysis, we found that chronic kidney disease had no effect on progression-free survival. However, irrespective of the tumor entity, chronic kidney disease was found to positively influence overall survival. We conclude that treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease is safe and efficient. ABSTRACT: Background: Checkpoint inhibitors are a standard of care in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC). Patients with these tumors often suffer from concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD). Limited data are available on the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with CKD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 126 patients who received checkpoint inhibitors for RCC (n = 85) or UC (n = 41) and analyzed the frequency of treatment- and immune-related adverse events (AEs). We performed a multivariate analysis to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 38.9% of patients had CKD. Frequencies of general AEs (49.0% in CKD vs. 48.1%, p > 0.99999) and immune-related AEs (28.6 vs. 24.7%, p ≥ 0.9999) did not significantly differ between the groups. There was no difference in PFS for patients with RCC or UC and CKD or without CKD (RCC: 6.81 vs. 7.54 months, HR 1.000 (95%CI 0.548–01.822), p = 0.999; UC:2.33 vs. 3.67 months, HR 01.492 (95%CI 0.686–3.247), p = 0.431). CKD appeared to be a potential effect modifier for OS in both RCC and UC (RCC: NR vs. 23.9 months, HR 0.502 (95%CI 0.219–1.152), p = 0.104; UC:18.84 vs. 15.42 months, HR 0.656 (95%CI 0.296–1.454), p = 0.299). Conclusions: Checkpoint inhibitor treatment in our cohort of patients with CKD was as safe and efficient as in the cohort of patients without CKD.