Cargando…

A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities

Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radcliffe, Erin, Lippincott, Ben, Anderson, Raeda, Jones, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073669
_version_ 1783676917925281792
author Radcliffe, Erin
Lippincott, Ben
Anderson, Raeda
Jones, Mike
author_facet Radcliffe, Erin
Lippincott, Ben
Anderson, Raeda
Jones, Mike
author_sort Radcliffe, Erin
collection PubMed
description Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities can access and use mHealth apps. At present, there is no source of unified information about the accessibility and usability of mHealth apps for people with disabilities. We set out to create such a source, establishing a systematic approach for evaluating app accessibility. Our goal was to develop a simple, replicable app evaluation process to generate useful information for people with disabilities (to aid suitable app selection) and app developers (to improve app accessibility and usability). We collected data using two existing assessment instruments to test three top-rated weight management apps with nine users representing three disability groups: vision, dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants with visual impairments reported the lowest accessibility ratings, most challenges, and least tolerance for issues. Participants with dexterity impairments experienced significant accessibility-related difficulties. Participants with cognitive impairments experienced mild difficulties and higher tolerances for issues. Our pilot protocol will be applied to test mHealth apps and populate a “curation” website to assist consumers in selecting mHealth apps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80364712021-04-12 A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities Radcliffe, Erin Lippincott, Ben Anderson, Raeda Jones, Mike Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities can access and use mHealth apps. At present, there is no source of unified information about the accessibility and usability of mHealth apps for people with disabilities. We set out to create such a source, establishing a systematic approach for evaluating app accessibility. Our goal was to develop a simple, replicable app evaluation process to generate useful information for people with disabilities (to aid suitable app selection) and app developers (to improve app accessibility and usability). We collected data using two existing assessment instruments to test three top-rated weight management apps with nine users representing three disability groups: vision, dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants with visual impairments reported the lowest accessibility ratings, most challenges, and least tolerance for issues. Participants with dexterity impairments experienced significant accessibility-related difficulties. Participants with cognitive impairments experienced mild difficulties and higher tolerances for issues. Our pilot protocol will be applied to test mHealth apps and populate a “curation” website to assist consumers in selecting mHealth apps. MDPI 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8036471/ /pubmed/33915917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073669 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Radcliffe, Erin
Lippincott, Ben
Anderson, Raeda
Jones, Mike
A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_full A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_fullStr A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_short A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
title_sort pilot evaluation of mhealth app accessibility for three top-rated weight management apps by people with disabilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073669
work_keys_str_mv AT radcliffeerin apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT lippincottben apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT andersonraeda apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT jonesmike apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT radcliffeerin pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT lippincottben pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT andersonraeda pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities
AT jonesmike pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities