Cargando…
A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities
Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073669 |
_version_ | 1783676917925281792 |
---|---|
author | Radcliffe, Erin Lippincott, Ben Anderson, Raeda Jones, Mike |
author_facet | Radcliffe, Erin Lippincott, Ben Anderson, Raeda Jones, Mike |
author_sort | Radcliffe, Erin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities can access and use mHealth apps. At present, there is no source of unified information about the accessibility and usability of mHealth apps for people with disabilities. We set out to create such a source, establishing a systematic approach for evaluating app accessibility. Our goal was to develop a simple, replicable app evaluation process to generate useful information for people with disabilities (to aid suitable app selection) and app developers (to improve app accessibility and usability). We collected data using two existing assessment instruments to test three top-rated weight management apps with nine users representing three disability groups: vision, dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants with visual impairments reported the lowest accessibility ratings, most challenges, and least tolerance for issues. Participants with dexterity impairments experienced significant accessibility-related difficulties. Participants with cognitive impairments experienced mild difficulties and higher tolerances for issues. Our pilot protocol will be applied to test mHealth apps and populate a “curation” website to assist consumers in selecting mHealth apps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80364712021-04-12 A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities Radcliffe, Erin Lippincott, Ben Anderson, Raeda Jones, Mike Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities can access and use mHealth apps. At present, there is no source of unified information about the accessibility and usability of mHealth apps for people with disabilities. We set out to create such a source, establishing a systematic approach for evaluating app accessibility. Our goal was to develop a simple, replicable app evaluation process to generate useful information for people with disabilities (to aid suitable app selection) and app developers (to improve app accessibility and usability). We collected data using two existing assessment instruments to test three top-rated weight management apps with nine users representing three disability groups: vision, dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants with visual impairments reported the lowest accessibility ratings, most challenges, and least tolerance for issues. Participants with dexterity impairments experienced significant accessibility-related difficulties. Participants with cognitive impairments experienced mild difficulties and higher tolerances for issues. Our pilot protocol will be applied to test mHealth apps and populate a “curation” website to assist consumers in selecting mHealth apps. MDPI 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8036471/ /pubmed/33915917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073669 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Radcliffe, Erin Lippincott, Ben Anderson, Raeda Jones, Mike A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities |
title | A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities |
title_full | A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities |
title_fullStr | A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities |
title_full_unstemmed | A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities |
title_short | A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities |
title_sort | pilot evaluation of mhealth app accessibility for three top-rated weight management apps by people with disabilities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073669 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radcliffeerin apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities AT lippincottben apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities AT andersonraeda apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities AT jonesmike apilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities AT radcliffeerin pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities AT lippincottben pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities AT andersonraeda pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities AT jonesmike pilotevaluationofmhealthappaccessibilityforthreetopratedweightmanagementappsbypeoplewithdisabilities |