Cargando…
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073535 |
_version_ | 1783676928443547648 |
---|---|
author | Frühauf, Anika Heußner, Julia Niedermeier, Martin Kopp, Martin |
author_facet | Frühauf, Anika Heußner, Julia Niedermeier, Martin Kopp, Martin |
author_sort | Frühauf, Anika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80365162021-04-12 Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study Frühauf, Anika Heußner, Julia Niedermeier, Martin Kopp, Martin Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field. MDPI 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8036516/ /pubmed/33805430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073535 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Frühauf, Anika Heußner, Julia Niedermeier, Martin Kopp, Martin Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title | Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_full | Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr | Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_short | Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study |
title_sort | expert views on therapeutic climbing—a multi-perspective, qualitative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073535 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fruhaufanika expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy AT heußnerjulia expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy AT niedermeiermartin expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy AT koppmartin expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy |