Cargando…

Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study

Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frühauf, Anika, Heußner, Julia, Niedermeier, Martin, Kopp, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073535
_version_ 1783676928443547648
author Frühauf, Anika
Heußner, Julia
Niedermeier, Martin
Kopp, Martin
author_facet Frühauf, Anika
Heußner, Julia
Niedermeier, Martin
Kopp, Martin
author_sort Frühauf, Anika
collection PubMed
description Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80365162021-04-12 Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study Frühauf, Anika Heußner, Julia Niedermeier, Martin Kopp, Martin Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Therapeutic climbing (TC) is regularly used as an add-on treatment option for a variety of disorders. However, evidence on the assessment of professionals deciding on the treatment options or assessing the appropriateness of treatment options is lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the potential of TC as an exercise intervention from different expert perspectives. The study was designed as a qualitative, problem-centered interview experiment to assess the perspectives of pedagogues, physicians, and psychologists on exercise therapy in general and the potential of TC. The sample consisted of 30 experts (10 pedagogues, 10 physicians, and 10 psychologists) with different levels of experience in TC (ᴓage: 41.7 years, ♀ = 43%). Overall, the potential of TC as an add-on treatment option for various disorders was rated by the respondents as positive and useful. The interviewed experts believed that TC can have a decisive effect on the social, psychological, and physiological domain as a sensibly used add-on therapy. However, considering the reported potential adverse effects and the costs connected with TC, it should not be considered as a panacea. Although research in this area is still much in its infancy, the positive perspective of the professional representatives surveyed could facilitate access to TC for patients and may foster more research in this field. MDPI 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8036516/ /pubmed/33805430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073535 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Frühauf, Anika
Heußner, Julia
Niedermeier, Martin
Kopp, Martin
Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_full Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_short Expert Views on Therapeutic Climbing—A Multi-Perspective, Qualitative Study
title_sort expert views on therapeutic climbing—a multi-perspective, qualitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805430
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073535
work_keys_str_mv AT fruhaufanika expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy
AT heußnerjulia expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy
AT niedermeiermartin expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy
AT koppmartin expertviewsontherapeuticclimbingamultiperspectivequalitativestudy