Cargando…
Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has a dismal prognosis. In selected patients with limited metastatic disease, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. This systematic review sought to examine current evidence on the value o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071608 |
_version_ | 1783676929147142144 |
---|---|
author | Timmer, Florentine E. F. Geboers, Bart Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne Schouten, Evelien A. C. Dijkstra, Madelon de Vries, Jan J. J. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka Meijerink, Martijn R. Scheffer, Hester J. |
author_facet | Timmer, Florentine E. F. Geboers, Bart Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne Schouten, Evelien A. C. Dijkstra, Madelon de Vries, Jan J. J. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka Meijerink, Martijn R. Scheffer, Hester J. |
author_sort | Timmer, Florentine E. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has a dismal prognosis. In selected patients with limited metastatic disease, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. This systematic review sought to examine current evidence on the value of additional locoregional treatment, including resection, ablation and embolization, in patients with hepatic or pulmonary mPDAC. The results, although liable to substantial bias, demonstrated superior survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment in a subset of patients after radical-intent local primary and metastatic treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). However, as a consequence of the bias, definitive conclusions regarding the seemingly beneficial effect of locoregional treatment cannot be endorsed. Randomized controlled trials with strictly selected oligometastatic PDAC patients are required to deduce final recommendations on this notion. ABSTRACT: The prognosis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) remains universally poor, requiring new and innovative treatment approaches. In a subset of oligometastatic PDAC patients, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. The aim of this systematic review was to explore and evaluate the current evidence on locoregional treatments for mPDAC. A systematic literature search was conducted on locoregional techniques, including resection, ablation and embolization, for mPDAC with a focus on hepatic and pulmonary metastases. A total of 59 studies were identified, including 63,453 patients. Although subject to significant bias, radical-intent local therapy for both the primary and metastatic sites was associated with a superior median overall survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to control groups receiving chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). To recruit patients that may benefit from these local treatments, selection appears essential. Most significant is the upfront possibility of local radical pancreatic and metastatic treatment. In addition, a patient’s response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, performance status, metastatic disease load and, to a lesser degree, histological differentiation grade and tumor marker CA19-9 serum levels, are powerful prognostic factors that help identify eligible subjects. Although the exact additive value of locoregional treatments for mPDAC patients cannot be distillated from the results, locoregional primary pancreatic and metastatic treatment seems beneficial for a highly selected group of oligometastatic PDAC patients. For definite recommendations, well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials with strict in- and exclusion criteria are needed to validate these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80365192021-04-12 Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review Timmer, Florentine E. F. Geboers, Bart Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne Schouten, Evelien A. C. Dijkstra, Madelon de Vries, Jan J. J. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka Meijerink, Martijn R. Scheffer, Hester J. Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has a dismal prognosis. In selected patients with limited metastatic disease, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. This systematic review sought to examine current evidence on the value of additional locoregional treatment, including resection, ablation and embolization, in patients with hepatic or pulmonary mPDAC. The results, although liable to substantial bias, demonstrated superior survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment in a subset of patients after radical-intent local primary and metastatic treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). However, as a consequence of the bias, definitive conclusions regarding the seemingly beneficial effect of locoregional treatment cannot be endorsed. Randomized controlled trials with strictly selected oligometastatic PDAC patients are required to deduce final recommendations on this notion. ABSTRACT: The prognosis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) remains universally poor, requiring new and innovative treatment approaches. In a subset of oligometastatic PDAC patients, locoregional therapy, in addition to systemic chemotherapy, may improve survival. The aim of this systematic review was to explore and evaluate the current evidence on locoregional treatments for mPDAC. A systematic literature search was conducted on locoregional techniques, including resection, ablation and embolization, for mPDAC with a focus on hepatic and pulmonary metastases. A total of 59 studies were identified, including 63,453 patients. Although subject to significant bias, radical-intent local therapy for both the primary and metastatic sites was associated with a superior median overall survival from metastatic diagnosis or treatment (hepatic mPDAC 7.8–19 months; pulmonary mPDAC 22.8–47 months) compared to control groups receiving chemotherapy or best supportive care (hepatic mPDAC 4.3–7.6 months; pulmonary mPDAC 11.8 months). To recruit patients that may benefit from these local treatments, selection appears essential. Most significant is the upfront possibility of local radical pancreatic and metastatic treatment. In addition, a patient’s response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, performance status, metastatic disease load and, to a lesser degree, histological differentiation grade and tumor marker CA19-9 serum levels, are powerful prognostic factors that help identify eligible subjects. Although the exact additive value of locoregional treatments for mPDAC patients cannot be distillated from the results, locoregional primary pancreatic and metastatic treatment seems beneficial for a highly selected group of oligometastatic PDAC patients. For definite recommendations, well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials with strict in- and exclusion criteria are needed to validate these results. MDPI 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8036519/ /pubmed/33807220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071608 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Timmer, Florentine E. F. Geboers, Bart Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne Schouten, Evelien A. C. Dijkstra, Madelon de Vries, Jan J. J. van den Tol, M. Petrousjka Meijerink, Martijn R. Scheffer, Hester J. Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review |
title | Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Locoregional Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Utilizing Resection, Ablation and Embolization: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | locoregional treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer utilizing resection, ablation and embolization: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmerflorentineef locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT geboersbart locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT nieuwenhuizensanne locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT schoutenevelienac locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT dijkstramadelon locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT devriesjanjj locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT vandentolmpetrousjka locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT meijerinkmartijnr locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview AT schefferhesterj locoregionaltreatmentofmetastaticpancreaticcancerutilizingresectionablationandembolizationasystematicreview |