Cargando…
Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer
The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of plantar pressure and reaction force measured using the Moticon and Pedar-x sensor insoles while rowing on a Concept2 ergometer. Nineteen participants performed four 500 m trials of ergometer rowing at 22–24 strokes/min; two t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21072418 |
_version_ | 1783676930301624320 |
---|---|
author | Barratt, Georgina Kate Bellenger, Clint Robertson, Eileen Yule Lane, Jason Crowther, Robert George |
author_facet | Barratt, Georgina Kate Bellenger, Clint Robertson, Eileen Yule Lane, Jason Crowther, Robert George |
author_sort | Barratt, Georgina Kate |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of plantar pressure and reaction force measured using the Moticon and Pedar-x sensor insoles while rowing on a Concept2 ergometer. Nineteen participants performed four 500 m trials of ergometer rowing at 22–24 strokes/min; two trials wearing Moticon insoles and two wearing Pedar-x insoles in a randomised order. Moticon and Pedar-x insoles both showed moderate to strong test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.57–0.92) for mean and peak plantar pressure and reaction force. Paired t-test demonstrated a significant difference (p < 0.001) between Moticon and Pedar-x insoles, effect size showed a large bias (ES > 1.13), and Pearson’s correlation (r < 0.37) showed poor agreement for all plantar pressure and reaction force variables. Compared to Pedar-x, the Moticon insoles demonstrated poor validity, however, the Moticon insoles had strong reliability. Due to poor validity, caution should be used when considering Moticon insoles to assess changes in pressure and force reliably over time, across multiple trials or sessions. Moticon’s wireless and user-friendly application would be beneficial for assessing and monitoring biomechanical parameters in rowing if validity between measures of interest and Moticon’s results can be established. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80365242021-04-12 Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer Barratt, Georgina Kate Bellenger, Clint Robertson, Eileen Yule Lane, Jason Crowther, Robert George Sensors (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of plantar pressure and reaction force measured using the Moticon and Pedar-x sensor insoles while rowing on a Concept2 ergometer. Nineteen participants performed four 500 m trials of ergometer rowing at 22–24 strokes/min; two trials wearing Moticon insoles and two wearing Pedar-x insoles in a randomised order. Moticon and Pedar-x insoles both showed moderate to strong test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.57–0.92) for mean and peak plantar pressure and reaction force. Paired t-test demonstrated a significant difference (p < 0.001) between Moticon and Pedar-x insoles, effect size showed a large bias (ES > 1.13), and Pearson’s correlation (r < 0.37) showed poor agreement for all plantar pressure and reaction force variables. Compared to Pedar-x, the Moticon insoles demonstrated poor validity, however, the Moticon insoles had strong reliability. Due to poor validity, caution should be used when considering Moticon insoles to assess changes in pressure and force reliably over time, across multiple trials or sessions. Moticon’s wireless and user-friendly application would be beneficial for assessing and monitoring biomechanical parameters in rowing if validity between measures of interest and Moticon’s results can be established. MDPI 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8036524/ /pubmed/33915797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21072418 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Barratt, Georgina Kate Bellenger, Clint Robertson, Eileen Yule Lane, Jason Crowther, Robert George Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer |
title | Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer |
title_full | Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer |
title_fullStr | Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer |
title_short | Validation of Plantar Pressure and Reaction Force Measured by Moticon Pressure Sensor Insoles on a Concept2 Rowing Ergometer |
title_sort | validation of plantar pressure and reaction force measured by moticon pressure sensor insoles on a concept2 rowing ergometer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21072418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrattgeorginakate validationofplantarpressureandreactionforcemeasuredbymoticonpressuresensorinsolesonaconcept2rowingergometer AT bellengerclint validationofplantarpressureandreactionforcemeasuredbymoticonpressuresensorinsolesonaconcept2rowingergometer AT robertsoneileenyule validationofplantarpressureandreactionforcemeasuredbymoticonpressuresensorinsolesonaconcept2rowingergometer AT lanejason validationofplantarpressureandreactionforcemeasuredbymoticonpressuresensorinsolesonaconcept2rowingergometer AT crowtherrobertgeorge validationofplantarpressureandreactionforcemeasuredbymoticonpressuresensorinsolesonaconcept2rowingergometer |