Cargando…

Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars

Tooth decay in children and adolescents remains a public health problem, despite prophylaxis and preventive measures being largely available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of four dental sealants, related to first permanent molar topography and patient age (when sealant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muntean, Alexandrina, Sarosi, Codruta, Sava, Sorina, Moldovan, Marioara, Condurache, Andrei Ilie, Delean, Ada Gabriela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14071646
_version_ 1783676938536091648
author Muntean, Alexandrina
Sarosi, Codruta
Sava, Sorina
Moldovan, Marioara
Condurache, Andrei Ilie
Delean, Ada Gabriela
author_facet Muntean, Alexandrina
Sarosi, Codruta
Sava, Sorina
Moldovan, Marioara
Condurache, Andrei Ilie
Delean, Ada Gabriela
author_sort Muntean, Alexandrina
collection PubMed
description Tooth decay in children and adolescents remains a public health problem, despite prophylaxis and preventive measures being largely available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of four dental sealants, related to first permanent molar topography and patient age (when sealant was applied for the first time). We assessed, by means of visual inspection and palpation with a dental probe, a group of 200 children, enrolled corresponding to school age-grade (mean age of 7 years at baseline) and randomly divided according to the material used as dental sealant (Admira seal©, Embrace Wet Bond©, Fotoseal©, GC Fuji Triaje©) in 4 groups (n = 50). Sealant clinical evaluation was made at 6-, 12-, 18-month intervals for dental material retention assessment. At 6 months, the sealant detached the most from 3.6 molars, and the material used was Fotoseal© (27.6%). At 12 months, Fotoseal© (48.3%) and GC Fuji Triaje© (41.4%) from 3.6 molars express detachment. At 18 months, 4.6. molars sealed with Admira Seal© (25.7%) and Embrace Wet Bond© (28.6%) lost the sealant. We noticed less detachment in maxillary molars and if sealant was applied around 7 years of age. In conclusion, sealant application on first permanent molars must be encouraged and practitioners can choose between various materials available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80365592021-04-12 Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars Muntean, Alexandrina Sarosi, Codruta Sava, Sorina Moldovan, Marioara Condurache, Andrei Ilie Delean, Ada Gabriela Materials (Basel) Article Tooth decay in children and adolescents remains a public health problem, despite prophylaxis and preventive measures being largely available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of four dental sealants, related to first permanent molar topography and patient age (when sealant was applied for the first time). We assessed, by means of visual inspection and palpation with a dental probe, a group of 200 children, enrolled corresponding to school age-grade (mean age of 7 years at baseline) and randomly divided according to the material used as dental sealant (Admira seal©, Embrace Wet Bond©, Fotoseal©, GC Fuji Triaje©) in 4 groups (n = 50). Sealant clinical evaluation was made at 6-, 12-, 18-month intervals for dental material retention assessment. At 6 months, the sealant detached the most from 3.6 molars, and the material used was Fotoseal© (27.6%). At 12 months, Fotoseal© (48.3%) and GC Fuji Triaje© (41.4%) from 3.6 molars express detachment. At 18 months, 4.6. molars sealed with Admira Seal© (25.7%) and Embrace Wet Bond© (28.6%) lost the sealant. We noticed less detachment in maxillary molars and if sealant was applied around 7 years of age. In conclusion, sealant application on first permanent molars must be encouraged and practitioners can choose between various materials available. MDPI 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8036559/ /pubmed/33801674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14071646 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Muntean, Alexandrina
Sarosi, Codruta
Sava, Sorina
Moldovan, Marioara
Condurache, Andrei Ilie
Delean, Ada Gabriela
Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars
title Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars
title_full Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars
title_fullStr Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars
title_full_unstemmed Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars
title_short Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars
title_sort dental sealant composition-retention assessment in young permanent molars
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14071646
work_keys_str_mv AT munteanalexandrina dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars
AT sarosicodruta dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars
AT savasorina dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars
AT moldovanmarioara dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars
AT conduracheandreiilie dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars
AT deleanadagabriela dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars