Cargando…
Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars
Tooth decay in children and adolescents remains a public health problem, despite prophylaxis and preventive measures being largely available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of four dental sealants, related to first permanent molar topography and patient age (when sealant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14071646 |
_version_ | 1783676938536091648 |
---|---|
author | Muntean, Alexandrina Sarosi, Codruta Sava, Sorina Moldovan, Marioara Condurache, Andrei Ilie Delean, Ada Gabriela |
author_facet | Muntean, Alexandrina Sarosi, Codruta Sava, Sorina Moldovan, Marioara Condurache, Andrei Ilie Delean, Ada Gabriela |
author_sort | Muntean, Alexandrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tooth decay in children and adolescents remains a public health problem, despite prophylaxis and preventive measures being largely available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of four dental sealants, related to first permanent molar topography and patient age (when sealant was applied for the first time). We assessed, by means of visual inspection and palpation with a dental probe, a group of 200 children, enrolled corresponding to school age-grade (mean age of 7 years at baseline) and randomly divided according to the material used as dental sealant (Admira seal©, Embrace Wet Bond©, Fotoseal©, GC Fuji Triaje©) in 4 groups (n = 50). Sealant clinical evaluation was made at 6-, 12-, 18-month intervals for dental material retention assessment. At 6 months, the sealant detached the most from 3.6 molars, and the material used was Fotoseal© (27.6%). At 12 months, Fotoseal© (48.3%) and GC Fuji Triaje© (41.4%) from 3.6 molars express detachment. At 18 months, 4.6. molars sealed with Admira Seal© (25.7%) and Embrace Wet Bond© (28.6%) lost the sealant. We noticed less detachment in maxillary molars and if sealant was applied around 7 years of age. In conclusion, sealant application on first permanent molars must be encouraged and practitioners can choose between various materials available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8036559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80365592021-04-12 Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars Muntean, Alexandrina Sarosi, Codruta Sava, Sorina Moldovan, Marioara Condurache, Andrei Ilie Delean, Ada Gabriela Materials (Basel) Article Tooth decay in children and adolescents remains a public health problem, despite prophylaxis and preventive measures being largely available. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of four dental sealants, related to first permanent molar topography and patient age (when sealant was applied for the first time). We assessed, by means of visual inspection and palpation with a dental probe, a group of 200 children, enrolled corresponding to school age-grade (mean age of 7 years at baseline) and randomly divided according to the material used as dental sealant (Admira seal©, Embrace Wet Bond©, Fotoseal©, GC Fuji Triaje©) in 4 groups (n = 50). Sealant clinical evaluation was made at 6-, 12-, 18-month intervals for dental material retention assessment. At 6 months, the sealant detached the most from 3.6 molars, and the material used was Fotoseal© (27.6%). At 12 months, Fotoseal© (48.3%) and GC Fuji Triaje© (41.4%) from 3.6 molars express detachment. At 18 months, 4.6. molars sealed with Admira Seal© (25.7%) and Embrace Wet Bond© (28.6%) lost the sealant. We noticed less detachment in maxillary molars and if sealant was applied around 7 years of age. In conclusion, sealant application on first permanent molars must be encouraged and practitioners can choose between various materials available. MDPI 2021-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8036559/ /pubmed/33801674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14071646 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Muntean, Alexandrina Sarosi, Codruta Sava, Sorina Moldovan, Marioara Condurache, Andrei Ilie Delean, Ada Gabriela Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars |
title | Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars |
title_full | Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars |
title_fullStr | Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars |
title_full_unstemmed | Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars |
title_short | Dental Sealant Composition-Retention Assessment in Young Permanent Molars |
title_sort | dental sealant composition-retention assessment in young permanent molars |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33801674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14071646 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munteanalexandrina dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars AT sarosicodruta dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars AT savasorina dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars AT moldovanmarioara dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars AT conduracheandreiilie dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars AT deleanadagabriela dentalsealantcompositionretentionassessmentinyoungpermanentmolars |