Cargando…

Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Thymomas are rare tumors developing in the anterior mediastinum. Despite their usually indolent behavior, recurrence might occur in 5–15% of cases. Considering their rarity, the optimal recurrence treatment is still unclear even if surgical treatment seems to ensure a remarkable long...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiappetta, Marco, Grossi, Ugo, Sperduti, Isabella, Margaritora, Stefano, Marulli, Giuseppe, Fiorelli, Alfonso, Sandri, Alberto, Mizuno, Tetsuya, Cusumano, Giacomo, Hamaji, Masatsugu, Cesario, Alfredo, Lococo, Filippo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071559
_version_ 1783677003053924352
author Chiappetta, Marco
Grossi, Ugo
Sperduti, Isabella
Margaritora, Stefano
Marulli, Giuseppe
Fiorelli, Alfonso
Sandri, Alberto
Mizuno, Tetsuya
Cusumano, Giacomo
Hamaji, Masatsugu
Cesario, Alfredo
Lococo, Filippo
author_facet Chiappetta, Marco
Grossi, Ugo
Sperduti, Isabella
Margaritora, Stefano
Marulli, Giuseppe
Fiorelli, Alfonso
Sandri, Alberto
Mizuno, Tetsuya
Cusumano, Giacomo
Hamaji, Masatsugu
Cesario, Alfredo
Lococo, Filippo
author_sort Chiappetta, Marco
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Thymomas are rare tumors developing in the anterior mediastinum. Despite their usually indolent behavior, recurrence might occur in 5–15% of cases. Considering their rarity, the optimal recurrence treatment is still unclear even if surgical treatment seems to ensure a remarkable long-term survival compared to chemo- or radiotherapy. However, the major part of studies report low patient numbers, and it is difficult to plan prospective studies due to tumor characteristics, long follow-up and rarity of cases. For these reasons, we planned a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical treatment with other therapies, in order to identify the best treatment for these patients. Our meta-analysis included more than 700 patients showing that surgical treatment seems to be associated with a better survival compared to other treatments and should be considered where feasible. ABSTRACT: Background: Optimal recurrent thymoma management remains arguable because of limited patient numbers, and relatively late and variable recurrence patterns. Given the absence of high-quality evidence and relatively small study cohorts, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis to determine the outcome of surgical and non-surgical approaches assessing the five-year overall survival (5y overall survival (OS)) in patients with recurrent thymoma. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search and analysis according to PRISMA guidelines of studies published from 1 January 1980 until 18 June 2020 from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus. We included studies with the cohorts’ superior to 30 patients describing recurrent thymoma treatment, comparing surgical and non-surgical approaches reporting survival data. Results: Literature search revealed 3017 articles. Nine studies met all inclusion criteria and were selected for the meta-analysis. The recurrences were local/regional in 73–98% of cases and multiple in 49–72%. After treatment, 5y OS ranged from 48–77% and 10y OS from 37–51%. The quantitative meta-analysis showed a better outcome comparing surgical vs other treatments. Two studies showed statistically significant risk differences in the 5y OS favoring complete resection. After pooling results of seven studies using the random model, the combined 5y OS risk difference was 0.39, with lower and upper limits of 0.16 and 0.62, respectively (p = 0.001), and a moderate heterogeneity among studies (p = 0.098, I2 = 43.9%). Definitive conclusions could not be drawn regarding the prognostic impact of myasthenia gravis, histology, and patterns of relapse reported in literature. Conclusions: Surgical treatment after thymoma recurrence is associated with a significant better 5y OS; therefore, surgical resection should be preferred in all technically feasible cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8036834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80368342021-04-12 Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chiappetta, Marco Grossi, Ugo Sperduti, Isabella Margaritora, Stefano Marulli, Giuseppe Fiorelli, Alfonso Sandri, Alberto Mizuno, Tetsuya Cusumano, Giacomo Hamaji, Masatsugu Cesario, Alfredo Lococo, Filippo Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Thymomas are rare tumors developing in the anterior mediastinum. Despite their usually indolent behavior, recurrence might occur in 5–15% of cases. Considering their rarity, the optimal recurrence treatment is still unclear even if surgical treatment seems to ensure a remarkable long-term survival compared to chemo- or radiotherapy. However, the major part of studies report low patient numbers, and it is difficult to plan prospective studies due to tumor characteristics, long follow-up and rarity of cases. For these reasons, we planned a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical treatment with other therapies, in order to identify the best treatment for these patients. Our meta-analysis included more than 700 patients showing that surgical treatment seems to be associated with a better survival compared to other treatments and should be considered where feasible. ABSTRACT: Background: Optimal recurrent thymoma management remains arguable because of limited patient numbers, and relatively late and variable recurrence patterns. Given the absence of high-quality evidence and relatively small study cohorts, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis to determine the outcome of surgical and non-surgical approaches assessing the five-year overall survival (5y overall survival (OS)) in patients with recurrent thymoma. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search and analysis according to PRISMA guidelines of studies published from 1 January 1980 until 18 June 2020 from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus. We included studies with the cohorts’ superior to 30 patients describing recurrent thymoma treatment, comparing surgical and non-surgical approaches reporting survival data. Results: Literature search revealed 3017 articles. Nine studies met all inclusion criteria and were selected for the meta-analysis. The recurrences were local/regional in 73–98% of cases and multiple in 49–72%. After treatment, 5y OS ranged from 48–77% and 10y OS from 37–51%. The quantitative meta-analysis showed a better outcome comparing surgical vs other treatments. Two studies showed statistically significant risk differences in the 5y OS favoring complete resection. After pooling results of seven studies using the random model, the combined 5y OS risk difference was 0.39, with lower and upper limits of 0.16 and 0.62, respectively (p = 0.001), and a moderate heterogeneity among studies (p = 0.098, I2 = 43.9%). Definitive conclusions could not be drawn regarding the prognostic impact of myasthenia gravis, histology, and patterns of relapse reported in literature. Conclusions: Surgical treatment after thymoma recurrence is associated with a significant better 5y OS; therefore, surgical resection should be preferred in all technically feasible cases. MDPI 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8036834/ /pubmed/33805310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071559 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Review
Chiappetta, Marco
Grossi, Ugo
Sperduti, Isabella
Margaritora, Stefano
Marulli, Giuseppe
Fiorelli, Alfonso
Sandri, Alberto
Mizuno, Tetsuya
Cusumano, Giacomo
Hamaji, Masatsugu
Cesario, Alfredo
Lococo, Filippo
Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Which Is the Best Treatment in Recurrent Thymoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort which is the best treatment in recurrent thymoma? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071559
work_keys_str_mv AT chiappettamarco whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grossiugo whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sperdutiisabella whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT margaritorastefano whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marulligiuseppe whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fiorellialfonso whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sandrialberto whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mizunotetsuya whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cusumanogiacomo whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hamajimasatsugu whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cesarioalfredo whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lococofilippo whichisthebesttreatmentinrecurrentthymomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis