Cargando…
Exercise Intensity in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Exercise-induced improvements in the VO(2)peak of cardiac rehabilitation participants are well documented. However, optimal exercise intensity remains doubtful. This study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity and program length to improve VO(2)peak in patients with cardiovascular disease...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808248 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073574 |
Sumario: | Exercise-induced improvements in the VO(2)peak of cardiac rehabilitation participants are well documented. However, optimal exercise intensity remains doubtful. This study aimed to identify the optimal exercise intensity and program length to improve VO(2)peak in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) following cardiac rehabilitation. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included a control group and at least one exercise group. RCTs assessed cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) changes resulting from exercise interventions and reported exercise intensity, risk ratio, and confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was CRF (VO(2)peak or VO(2) at anaerobic threshold). Two hundred and twenty-one studies were found from the initial search (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus). Following inclusion criteria, 16 RCTs were considered. Meta-regression analyses revealed that VO(2)peak significantly increased in all intensity categories. Moderate-intensity interventions were associated with a moderate increase in relative VO(2)peak (SMD = 0.71 mL-kg(−1)-min(−1); 95% CI = [0.27–1.15]; p = 0.001) with moderate heterogeneity (I(2) = 45%). Moderate-to-vigorous-intensity and vigorous-intensity interventions were associated with a large increase in relative VO(2)peak (SMD = 1.84 mL-kg(−1)-min(−1); 95% CI = [1.18–2.50], p < 0.001 and SMD = 1.80 mL-kg(−1)-min(−1); 95% CI = [0.82–2.78] p = 0.001, respectively), and were also highly heterogeneous with I(2) values of 91% and 95% (p < 0.001), respectively. Moderate-to-vigorous and vigorous-intensity interventions, conducted for 6–12 weeks, were more effective at improving CVD patients’ CRF. |
---|