Cargando…

Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up

The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the traditional “All on Four” technique with digital smile designed computer-aided “All on Four” rehabilitation; with a 4-years follow-up. The protocol was applied to a total of 50 patients randomly recruited and divided in two groups. Digital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cattoni, Francesca, Chirico, Luca, Merlone, Alberto, Manacorda, Michele, Vinci, Raffaele, Gherlone, Enrico Felice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073449
_version_ 1783677117848879104
author Cattoni, Francesca
Chirico, Luca
Merlone, Alberto
Manacorda, Michele
Vinci, Raffaele
Gherlone, Enrico Felice
author_facet Cattoni, Francesca
Chirico, Luca
Merlone, Alberto
Manacorda, Michele
Vinci, Raffaele
Gherlone, Enrico Felice
author_sort Cattoni, Francesca
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the traditional “All on Four” technique with digital smile designed computer-aided “All on Four” rehabilitation; with a 4-years follow-up. The protocol was applied to a total of 50 patients randomly recruited and divided in two groups. Digital protocol allows for a completely virtual planning of the exact position of the fixtures, which allows one to perform a flapless surgery procedure with great accuracy (mini-invasive surgery) and also it is possible to use virtually planned prostheses realized with Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) (methods for an immediate loading of the implants. After 4 years from the treatments 98% of success were obtained for the group of patients treated with the traditional protocol and 100% for the digital protocol. At each time interval a significant difference in peri-implant crestal bone loss between the two groups was detected; with an average Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) at 4 years of 1.12 ± 0.26 mm in the traditional group and 0.83 ± 0.11 mm in the digital group. Patients belonging to the digital group have judged the immediate loading (92%), digital smile preview (93%), the mock-up test (98%) and guided surgery (94%) as very effective. All patients treated with a digital method reported lower values of during-surgery and post-surgery pain compared to patients rehabilitated using traditional treatment. In conclusion, the totally digital protocol described in the present study represents a valid therapeutic alternative to the traditional “All on Four” protocol for implant-supported rehabilitations of edentulous dental arches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8037328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80373282021-04-12 Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up Cattoni, Francesca Chirico, Luca Merlone, Alberto Manacorda, Michele Vinci, Raffaele Gherlone, Enrico Felice Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the traditional “All on Four” technique with digital smile designed computer-aided “All on Four” rehabilitation; with a 4-years follow-up. The protocol was applied to a total of 50 patients randomly recruited and divided in two groups. Digital protocol allows for a completely virtual planning of the exact position of the fixtures, which allows one to perform a flapless surgery procedure with great accuracy (mini-invasive surgery) and also it is possible to use virtually planned prostheses realized with Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) (methods for an immediate loading of the implants. After 4 years from the treatments 98% of success were obtained for the group of patients treated with the traditional protocol and 100% for the digital protocol. At each time interval a significant difference in peri-implant crestal bone loss between the two groups was detected; with an average Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) at 4 years of 1.12 ± 0.26 mm in the traditional group and 0.83 ± 0.11 mm in the digital group. Patients belonging to the digital group have judged the immediate loading (92%), digital smile preview (93%), the mock-up test (98%) and guided surgery (94%) as very effective. All patients treated with a digital method reported lower values of during-surgery and post-surgery pain compared to patients rehabilitated using traditional treatment. In conclusion, the totally digital protocol described in the present study represents a valid therapeutic alternative to the traditional “All on Four” protocol for implant-supported rehabilitations of edentulous dental arches. MDPI 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8037328/ /pubmed/33810379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073449 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Cattoni, Francesca
Chirico, Luca
Merlone, Alberto
Manacorda, Michele
Vinci, Raffaele
Gherlone, Enrico Felice
Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up
title Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up
title_full Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up
title_fullStr Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up
title_short Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up
title_sort digital smile designed computer-aided surgery versus traditional workflow in “all on four” rehabilitations: a randomized clinical trial with 4-years follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073449
work_keys_str_mv AT cattonifrancesca digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup
AT chiricoluca digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup
AT merlonealberto digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup
AT manacordamichele digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup
AT vinciraffaele digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup
AT gherloneenricofelice digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup