Cargando…
Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up
The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the traditional “All on Four” technique with digital smile designed computer-aided “All on Four” rehabilitation; with a 4-years follow-up. The protocol was applied to a total of 50 patients randomly recruited and divided in two groups. Digital...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073449 |
_version_ | 1783677117848879104 |
---|---|
author | Cattoni, Francesca Chirico, Luca Merlone, Alberto Manacorda, Michele Vinci, Raffaele Gherlone, Enrico Felice |
author_facet | Cattoni, Francesca Chirico, Luca Merlone, Alberto Manacorda, Michele Vinci, Raffaele Gherlone, Enrico Felice |
author_sort | Cattoni, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the traditional “All on Four” technique with digital smile designed computer-aided “All on Four” rehabilitation; with a 4-years follow-up. The protocol was applied to a total of 50 patients randomly recruited and divided in two groups. Digital protocol allows for a completely virtual planning of the exact position of the fixtures, which allows one to perform a flapless surgery procedure with great accuracy (mini-invasive surgery) and also it is possible to use virtually planned prostheses realized with Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) (methods for an immediate loading of the implants. After 4 years from the treatments 98% of success were obtained for the group of patients treated with the traditional protocol and 100% for the digital protocol. At each time interval a significant difference in peri-implant crestal bone loss between the two groups was detected; with an average Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) at 4 years of 1.12 ± 0.26 mm in the traditional group and 0.83 ± 0.11 mm in the digital group. Patients belonging to the digital group have judged the immediate loading (92%), digital smile preview (93%), the mock-up test (98%) and guided surgery (94%) as very effective. All patients treated with a digital method reported lower values of during-surgery and post-surgery pain compared to patients rehabilitated using traditional treatment. In conclusion, the totally digital protocol described in the present study represents a valid therapeutic alternative to the traditional “All on Four” protocol for implant-supported rehabilitations of edentulous dental arches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8037328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80373282021-04-12 Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up Cattoni, Francesca Chirico, Luca Merlone, Alberto Manacorda, Michele Vinci, Raffaele Gherlone, Enrico Felice Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the traditional “All on Four” technique with digital smile designed computer-aided “All on Four” rehabilitation; with a 4-years follow-up. The protocol was applied to a total of 50 patients randomly recruited and divided in two groups. Digital protocol allows for a completely virtual planning of the exact position of the fixtures, which allows one to perform a flapless surgery procedure with great accuracy (mini-invasive surgery) and also it is possible to use virtually planned prostheses realized with Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) (methods for an immediate loading of the implants. After 4 years from the treatments 98% of success were obtained for the group of patients treated with the traditional protocol and 100% for the digital protocol. At each time interval a significant difference in peri-implant crestal bone loss between the two groups was detected; with an average Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) at 4 years of 1.12 ± 0.26 mm in the traditional group and 0.83 ± 0.11 mm in the digital group. Patients belonging to the digital group have judged the immediate loading (92%), digital smile preview (93%), the mock-up test (98%) and guided surgery (94%) as very effective. All patients treated with a digital method reported lower values of during-surgery and post-surgery pain compared to patients rehabilitated using traditional treatment. In conclusion, the totally digital protocol described in the present study represents a valid therapeutic alternative to the traditional “All on Four” protocol for implant-supported rehabilitations of edentulous dental arches. MDPI 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8037328/ /pubmed/33810379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073449 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Cattoni, Francesca Chirico, Luca Merlone, Alberto Manacorda, Michele Vinci, Raffaele Gherlone, Enrico Felice Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up |
title | Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up |
title_full | Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up |
title_short | Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up |
title_sort | digital smile designed computer-aided surgery versus traditional workflow in “all on four” rehabilitations: a randomized clinical trial with 4-years follow-up |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cattonifrancesca digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup AT chiricoluca digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup AT merlonealberto digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup AT manacordamichele digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup AT vinciraffaele digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup AT gherloneenricofelice digitalsmiledesignedcomputeraidedsurgeryversustraditionalworkflowinallonfourrehabilitationsarandomizedclinicaltrialwith4yearsfollowup |