Cargando…
The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is large heterogeneity in invitation schemes and participation rates in colorectal cancer screening programs offering fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests). It is unclear what the most effective invitation strategies are for fecal occult blood te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071520 |
_version_ | 1783677138681987072 |
---|---|
author | Gruner, Laura F. Amitay, Efrat L. Heisser, Thomas Guo, Feng Niedermaier, Tobias Gies, Anton Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann |
author_facet | Gruner, Laura F. Amitay, Efrat L. Heisser, Thomas Guo, Feng Niedermaier, Tobias Gies, Anton Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann |
author_sort | Gruner, Laura F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is large heterogeneity in invitation schemes and participation rates in colorectal cancer screening programs offering fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests). It is unclear what the most effective invitation strategies are for fecal occult blood tests. In this systematic review, advance notification, mailed fecal occult blood test, and reminders had major, consistent, and complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening. Our findings show that the effectiveness of invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening can be substantially increased across several settings by the implementation of comprehensive invitation strategies. ABSTRACT: Personal invitations for fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests) are increasingly used to raise their usage for colorectal cancer screening. However, there is a large heterogeneity in applied invitation schemes. We aimed to review evidence for the effectiveness of various invitation schemes. The main outcome was the fecal occult blood test usage rate. A systematic search was performed in Medline and Web of Science (up to 9 July 2020). Randomized controlled trials or cluster-randomized controlled trials were eligible, which reported on general invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening sent to the general population at average colorectal cancer risk. (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020169409). Overall, 34 studies were included. Invitations with an attached, i.e., mailed fecal occult blood test consistently increased test usage by 4–19.7% points, compared to other methods of test provision. Likewise, the introduction of advance notification consistently led to a higher usage rate, with an increase of 3.3–10.8% points. Reminders showed positive but varying effects by method. With an increase of 8.5–15.8% points, letter or email reminders were more effective than reminders by phone call or text message (0.6–6.5% points). Inconsistent results were found for financial incentives ((−8.4)–20% points) and for added or changed invitation material ((−3.5)–11.8% points). With 3.5–24.7% points, the strongest increases in use were achieved by multifaceted invitation, implementing multiple components. Any invitation scheme was superior over no invitation. Advance notification, mailing of fecal occult blood test, and reminders were consistently shown to have major, complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8037417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80374172021-04-12 The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Gruner, Laura F. Amitay, Efrat L. Heisser, Thomas Guo, Feng Niedermaier, Tobias Gies, Anton Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is large heterogeneity in invitation schemes and participation rates in colorectal cancer screening programs offering fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests). It is unclear what the most effective invitation strategies are for fecal occult blood tests. In this systematic review, advance notification, mailed fecal occult blood test, and reminders had major, consistent, and complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening. Our findings show that the effectiveness of invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening can be substantially increased across several settings by the implementation of comprehensive invitation strategies. ABSTRACT: Personal invitations for fecal occult blood tests (nowadays mostly fecal immunochemical tests) are increasingly used to raise their usage for colorectal cancer screening. However, there is a large heterogeneity in applied invitation schemes. We aimed to review evidence for the effectiveness of various invitation schemes. The main outcome was the fecal occult blood test usage rate. A systematic search was performed in Medline and Web of Science (up to 9 July 2020). Randomized controlled trials or cluster-randomized controlled trials were eligible, which reported on general invitations for fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening sent to the general population at average colorectal cancer risk. (PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020169409). Overall, 34 studies were included. Invitations with an attached, i.e., mailed fecal occult blood test consistently increased test usage by 4–19.7% points, compared to other methods of test provision. Likewise, the introduction of advance notification consistently led to a higher usage rate, with an increase of 3.3–10.8% points. Reminders showed positive but varying effects by method. With an increase of 8.5–15.8% points, letter or email reminders were more effective than reminders by phone call or text message (0.6–6.5% points). Inconsistent results were found for financial incentives ((−8.4)–20% points) and for added or changed invitation material ((−3.5)–11.8% points). With 3.5–24.7% points, the strongest increases in use were achieved by multifaceted invitation, implementing multiple components. Any invitation scheme was superior over no invitation. Advance notification, mailing of fecal occult blood test, and reminders were consistently shown to have major, complementary potential to increase participation in fecal occult blood test-based colorectal cancer screening settings. MDPI 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8037417/ /pubmed/33806234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071520 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Gruner, Laura F. Amitay, Efrat L. Heisser, Thomas Guo, Feng Niedermaier, Tobias Gies, Anton Hoffmeister, Michael Brenner, Hermann The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | The Effects of Different Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | effects of different invitation schemes on the use of fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening: systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33806234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grunerlauraf theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT amitayefratl theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT heisserthomas theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT guofeng theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT niedermaiertobias theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT giesanton theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hoffmeistermichael theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT brennerhermann theeffectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT grunerlauraf effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT amitayefratl effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT heisserthomas effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT guofeng effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT niedermaiertobias effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT giesanton effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hoffmeistermichael effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT brennerhermann effectsofdifferentinvitationschemesontheuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsforcolorectalcancerscreeningsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |