Cargando…

A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds

Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava, Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi, Choudhary, Rajan, Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13071105
_version_ 1783677146680524800
author Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava
Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi
Choudhary, Rajan
Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar
author_facet Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava
Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi
Choudhary, Rajan
Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar
author_sort Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava
collection PubMed
description Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material is able to colonize host cells sufficiently to meet up the requirements of regeneration and repair. This process is multi-stage and requires the development of various components to create the desired neo-tissue or organ. In several current TE strategies, biomaterials are essential components. While several polymers are established for their use as biomaterials, careful consideration of the cellular environment and interactions needed is required in selecting a polymer for a given application. Depending on this, scaffold materials can be of natural or synthetic origin, degradable or nondegradable. In this review, an overview of various natural and synthetic polymers and their possible composite scaffolds with their physicochemical properties including biocompatibility, biodegradability, morphology, mechanical strength, pore size, and porosity are discussed. The scaffolds fabrication techniques and a few commercially available biopolymers are also tabulated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8037451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80374512021-04-12 A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi Choudhary, Rajan Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar Polymers (Basel) Review Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material is able to colonize host cells sufficiently to meet up the requirements of regeneration and repair. This process is multi-stage and requires the development of various components to create the desired neo-tissue or organ. In several current TE strategies, biomaterials are essential components. While several polymers are established for their use as biomaterials, careful consideration of the cellular environment and interactions needed is required in selecting a polymer for a given application. Depending on this, scaffold materials can be of natural or synthetic origin, degradable or nondegradable. In this review, an overview of various natural and synthetic polymers and their possible composite scaffolds with their physicochemical properties including biocompatibility, biodegradability, morphology, mechanical strength, pore size, and porosity are discussed. The scaffolds fabrication techniques and a few commercially available biopolymers are also tabulated. MDPI 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8037451/ /pubmed/33808492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13071105 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Review
Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava
Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi
Choudhary, Rajan
Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar
A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
title A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
title_full A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
title_fullStr A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
title_short A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
title_sort comparative review of natural and synthetic biopolymer composite scaffolds
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808492
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13071105
work_keys_str_mv AT reddymsaibhargava acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds
AT ponnammadeepalekshmi acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds
AT choudharyrajan acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds
AT sadasivunikishorkumar acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds
AT reddymsaibhargava comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds
AT ponnammadeepalekshmi comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds
AT choudharyrajan comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds
AT sadasivunikishorkumar comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds