Cargando…
A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13071105 |
_version_ | 1783677146680524800 |
---|---|
author | Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi Choudhary, Rajan Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar |
author_facet | Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi Choudhary, Rajan Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar |
author_sort | Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material is able to colonize host cells sufficiently to meet up the requirements of regeneration and repair. This process is multi-stage and requires the development of various components to create the desired neo-tissue or organ. In several current TE strategies, biomaterials are essential components. While several polymers are established for their use as biomaterials, careful consideration of the cellular environment and interactions needed is required in selecting a polymer for a given application. Depending on this, scaffold materials can be of natural or synthetic origin, degradable or nondegradable. In this review, an overview of various natural and synthetic polymers and their possible composite scaffolds with their physicochemical properties including biocompatibility, biodegradability, morphology, mechanical strength, pore size, and porosity are discussed. The scaffolds fabrication techniques and a few commercially available biopolymers are also tabulated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8037451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80374512021-04-12 A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi Choudhary, Rajan Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar Polymers (Basel) Review Tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine integrate information and technology from various fields to restore/replace tissues and damaged organs for medical treatments. To achieve this, scaffolds act as delivery vectors or as cellular systems for drugs and cells; thereby, cellular material is able to colonize host cells sufficiently to meet up the requirements of regeneration and repair. This process is multi-stage and requires the development of various components to create the desired neo-tissue or organ. In several current TE strategies, biomaterials are essential components. While several polymers are established for their use as biomaterials, careful consideration of the cellular environment and interactions needed is required in selecting a polymer for a given application. Depending on this, scaffold materials can be of natural or synthetic origin, degradable or nondegradable. In this review, an overview of various natural and synthetic polymers and their possible composite scaffolds with their physicochemical properties including biocompatibility, biodegradability, morphology, mechanical strength, pore size, and porosity are discussed. The scaffolds fabrication techniques and a few commercially available biopolymers are also tabulated. MDPI 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8037451/ /pubmed/33808492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13071105 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Review Reddy, M. Sai Bhargava Ponnamma, Deepalekshmi Choudhary, Rajan Sadasivuni, Kishor Kumar A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds |
title | A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds |
title_full | A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds |
title_short | A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds |
title_sort | comparative review of natural and synthetic biopolymer composite scaffolds |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8037451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33808492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13071105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reddymsaibhargava acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds AT ponnammadeepalekshmi acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds AT choudharyrajan acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds AT sadasivunikishorkumar acomparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds AT reddymsaibhargava comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds AT ponnammadeepalekshmi comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds AT choudharyrajan comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds AT sadasivunikishorkumar comparativereviewofnaturalandsyntheticbiopolymercompositescaffolds |