Cargando…
Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation
BACKGROUND: Recipient selection for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is based primarily on criteria affecting the chance of long-term success. Here, the relationship between pretransplant bridging therapy and long-term survival was investigated in a subgroup analysis of the Si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8038254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab005 |
_version_ | 1783677332752433152 |
---|---|
author | Renner, P Da Silva, T Schnitzbauer, A A Verloh, N Schlitt, H J Geissler, E K |
author_facet | Renner, P Da Silva, T Schnitzbauer, A A Verloh, N Schlitt, H J Geissler, E K |
author_sort | Renner, P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recipient selection for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is based primarily on criteria affecting the chance of long-term success. Here, the relationship between pretransplant bridging therapy and long-term survival was investigated in a subgroup analysis of the SiLVER Study. METHODS: Response to bridging, as defined by comparison of imaging at the time of listing and post-transplant pathology report, was categorized into controlled versus progressive disease (more than 20 per cent tumour growth or development of new lesions). RESULTS: Of 525 patients with HCC who had liver transplantation, 350 recipients underwent pretransplant bridging therapy. Tumour progression despite bridging was an independent risk factor affecting overall survival (hazard ratio 1.80; P = 0.005). For patients within the Milan criteria (MC) at listing, mean overall survival was longer for those with controlled versus progressive disease (6.8 versus 5.8 years; P < 0.001). Importantly, patients with HCCs outside the MC that were downsized to within the MC before liver transplantation had poor outcomes compared with patients who never exceeded the MC (mean overall survival 6.2 versus 6.6 years respectively; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Patients with HCCs within the MC that did not show tumour progression under locoregional therapy had the best outcomes after liver transplantation. Downstaging into the limits of the MC did not improve the probability of survival. Prognostic factors determining the long-term success of liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are still under discussion. A subgroup analysis of the SiLVER trial showed that disease control under bridging therapy is strongly associated with improved prognosis in terms of overall survival. However, in tumours exceeding the limits of the Milan criteria, downstaging did not restore the probability of survival compared with that of patients within the Milan criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8038254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80382542021-04-14 Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation Renner, P Da Silva, T Schnitzbauer, A A Verloh, N Schlitt, H J Geissler, E K BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Recipient selection for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is based primarily on criteria affecting the chance of long-term success. Here, the relationship between pretransplant bridging therapy and long-term survival was investigated in a subgroup analysis of the SiLVER Study. METHODS: Response to bridging, as defined by comparison of imaging at the time of listing and post-transplant pathology report, was categorized into controlled versus progressive disease (more than 20 per cent tumour growth or development of new lesions). RESULTS: Of 525 patients with HCC who had liver transplantation, 350 recipients underwent pretransplant bridging therapy. Tumour progression despite bridging was an independent risk factor affecting overall survival (hazard ratio 1.80; P = 0.005). For patients within the Milan criteria (MC) at listing, mean overall survival was longer for those with controlled versus progressive disease (6.8 versus 5.8 years; P < 0.001). Importantly, patients with HCCs outside the MC that were downsized to within the MC before liver transplantation had poor outcomes compared with patients who never exceeded the MC (mean overall survival 6.2 versus 6.6 years respectively; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Patients with HCCs within the MC that did not show tumour progression under locoregional therapy had the best outcomes after liver transplantation. Downstaging into the limits of the MC did not improve the probability of survival. Prognostic factors determining the long-term success of liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are still under discussion. A subgroup analysis of the SiLVER trial showed that disease control under bridging therapy is strongly associated with improved prognosis in terms of overall survival. However, in tumours exceeding the limits of the Milan criteria, downstaging did not restore the probability of survival compared with that of patients within the Milan criteria. Oxford University Press 2021-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8038254/ /pubmed/33839747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab005 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Renner, P Da Silva, T Schnitzbauer, A A Verloh, N Schlitt, H J Geissler, E K Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation |
title | Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation |
title_full | Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation |
title_fullStr | Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation |
title_short | Hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation |
title_sort | hepatocellular carcinoma progression during bridging before liver transplantation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8038254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33839747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rennerp hepatocellularcarcinomaprogressionduringbridgingbeforelivertransplantation AT dasilvat hepatocellularcarcinomaprogressionduringbridgingbeforelivertransplantation AT schnitzbaueraa hepatocellularcarcinomaprogressionduringbridgingbeforelivertransplantation AT verlohn hepatocellularcarcinomaprogressionduringbridgingbeforelivertransplantation AT schlitthj hepatocellularcarcinomaprogressionduringbridgingbeforelivertransplantation AT geisslerek hepatocellularcarcinomaprogressionduringbridgingbeforelivertransplantation |