Cargando…

Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins

In the past twenty years marine biotoxin analysis in routine regulatory monitoring has advanced significantly in Europe (EU) and other regions from the use of the mouse bioassay (MBA) towards the high-end analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dillon, Michael, Zaczek-Moczydlowska, Maja A., Edwards, Christine, Turner, Andrew D., Miller, Peter I., Moore, Heather, McKinney, April, Lawton, Linda, Campbell, Katrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8038394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33916687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21072499
_version_ 1783677365340078080
author Dillon, Michael
Zaczek-Moczydlowska, Maja A.
Edwards, Christine
Turner, Andrew D.
Miller, Peter I.
Moore, Heather
McKinney, April
Lawton, Linda
Campbell, Katrina
author_facet Dillon, Michael
Zaczek-Moczydlowska, Maja A.
Edwards, Christine
Turner, Andrew D.
Miller, Peter I.
Moore, Heather
McKinney, April
Lawton, Linda
Campbell, Katrina
author_sort Dillon, Michael
collection PubMed
description In the past twenty years marine biotoxin analysis in routine regulatory monitoring has advanced significantly in Europe (EU) and other regions from the use of the mouse bioassay (MBA) towards the high-end analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Previously, acceptance of these advanced methods, in progressing away from the MBA, was hindered by a lack of commercial certified analytical standards for method development and validation. This has now been addressed whereby the availability of a wide range of analytical standards from several companies in the EU, North America and Asia has enhanced the development and validation of methods to the required regulatory standards. However, the cost of the high-end analytical equipment, lengthy procedures and the need for qualified personnel to perform analysis can still be a challenge for routine monitoring laboratories. In developing regions, aquaculture production is increasing and alternative inexpensive Sensitive, Measurable, Accurate and Real-Time (SMART) rapid point-of-site testing (POST) methods suitable for novice end users that can be validated and internationally accepted remain an objective for both regulators and the industry. The range of commercial testing kits on the market for marine toxin analysis remains limited and even more so those meeting the requirements for use in regulatory control. Individual assays include enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and lateral flow membrane-based immunoassays (LFIA) for EU-regulated toxins, such as okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxins (DTXs), saxitoxin (STX) and its analogues and domoic acid (DA) in the form of three separate tests offering varying costs and benefits for the industry. It can be observed from the literature that not only are developments and improvements ongoing for these assays, but there are also novel assays being developed using upcoming state-of-the-art biosensor technology. This review focuses on both currently available methods and recent advances in innovative methods for marine biotoxin testing and the end-user practicalities that need to be observed. Furthermore, it highlights trends that are influencing assay developments such as multiplexing capabilities and rapid POST, indicating potential detection methods that will shape the future market.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8038394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80383942021-04-12 Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins Dillon, Michael Zaczek-Moczydlowska, Maja A. Edwards, Christine Turner, Andrew D. Miller, Peter I. Moore, Heather McKinney, April Lawton, Linda Campbell, Katrina Sensors (Basel) Review In the past twenty years marine biotoxin analysis in routine regulatory monitoring has advanced significantly in Europe (EU) and other regions from the use of the mouse bioassay (MBA) towards the high-end analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Previously, acceptance of these advanced methods, in progressing away from the MBA, was hindered by a lack of commercial certified analytical standards for method development and validation. This has now been addressed whereby the availability of a wide range of analytical standards from several companies in the EU, North America and Asia has enhanced the development and validation of methods to the required regulatory standards. However, the cost of the high-end analytical equipment, lengthy procedures and the need for qualified personnel to perform analysis can still be a challenge for routine monitoring laboratories. In developing regions, aquaculture production is increasing and alternative inexpensive Sensitive, Measurable, Accurate and Real-Time (SMART) rapid point-of-site testing (POST) methods suitable for novice end users that can be validated and internationally accepted remain an objective for both regulators and the industry. The range of commercial testing kits on the market for marine toxin analysis remains limited and even more so those meeting the requirements for use in regulatory control. Individual assays include enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and lateral flow membrane-based immunoassays (LFIA) for EU-regulated toxins, such as okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxins (DTXs), saxitoxin (STX) and its analogues and domoic acid (DA) in the form of three separate tests offering varying costs and benefits for the industry. It can be observed from the literature that not only are developments and improvements ongoing for these assays, but there are also novel assays being developed using upcoming state-of-the-art biosensor technology. This review focuses on both currently available methods and recent advances in innovative methods for marine biotoxin testing and the end-user practicalities that need to be observed. Furthermore, it highlights trends that are influencing assay developments such as multiplexing capabilities and rapid POST, indicating potential detection methods that will shape the future market. MDPI 2021-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8038394/ /pubmed/33916687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21072499 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Dillon, Michael
Zaczek-Moczydlowska, Maja A.
Edwards, Christine
Turner, Andrew D.
Miller, Peter I.
Moore, Heather
McKinney, April
Lawton, Linda
Campbell, Katrina
Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins
title Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins
title_full Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins
title_fullStr Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins
title_full_unstemmed Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins
title_short Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins
title_sort current trends and challenges for rapid smart diagnostics at point-of-site testing for marine toxins
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8038394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33916687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21072499
work_keys_str_mv AT dillonmichael currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT zaczekmoczydlowskamajaa currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT edwardschristine currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT turnerandrewd currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT millerpeteri currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT mooreheather currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT mckinneyapril currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT lawtonlinda currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins
AT campbellkatrina currenttrendsandchallengesforrapidsmartdiagnosticsatpointofsitetestingformarinetoxins