Cargando…

Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review

BACKGROUND: Understanding how biological communities change over time is of increasing importance as Earth moves into the Anthropocene. A wide variety of methods are used for multivariate community analysis and are variously applied to research that aims to characterise temporal dynamics in communit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckley, Hannah L., Day, Nicola J., Lear, Gavin, Case, Bradley S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8038643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889452
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11250
_version_ 1783677423048458240
author Buckley, Hannah L.
Day, Nicola J.
Lear, Gavin
Case, Bradley S.
author_facet Buckley, Hannah L.
Day, Nicola J.
Lear, Gavin
Case, Bradley S.
author_sort Buckley, Hannah L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding how biological communities change over time is of increasing importance as Earth moves into the Anthropocene. A wide variety of methods are used for multivariate community analysis and are variously applied to research that aims to characterise temporal dynamics in community composition. Understanding these methods and how they are applied is useful for determining best practice in community ecology. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed the ecological literature from 1990 to 2018 that used multivariate methods to address questions of temporal community dynamics. For each paper that fulfilled our search criteria, we recorded the types of multivariate analysis used to characterise temporal community dynamics in addition to the research aim, habitat type, location, taxon and the experimental design. RESULTS: Most studies had relatively few temporal replicates; the median number was seven time points. Nearly 70% of studies applied more than one analysis method; descriptive methods such as bar graphs and ordination were the most commonly applied methods. Surprisingly, the types of analyses used were only related to the number of temporal replicates, but not to research aim or any other aspects of experimental design such as taxon, or habitat or year of study. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals that most studies interested in understanding community dynamics use relatively short time series meaning that several, more sophisticated, temporal analyses are not widely applicable. However, newer methods using multivariate dissimilarities are growing in popularity and many can be applied to time series of any length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8038643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80386432021-04-21 Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review Buckley, Hannah L. Day, Nicola J. Lear, Gavin Case, Bradley S. PeerJ Biodiversity BACKGROUND: Understanding how biological communities change over time is of increasing importance as Earth moves into the Anthropocene. A wide variety of methods are used for multivariate community analysis and are variously applied to research that aims to characterise temporal dynamics in community composition. Understanding these methods and how they are applied is useful for determining best practice in community ecology. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed the ecological literature from 1990 to 2018 that used multivariate methods to address questions of temporal community dynamics. For each paper that fulfilled our search criteria, we recorded the types of multivariate analysis used to characterise temporal community dynamics in addition to the research aim, habitat type, location, taxon and the experimental design. RESULTS: Most studies had relatively few temporal replicates; the median number was seven time points. Nearly 70% of studies applied more than one analysis method; descriptive methods such as bar graphs and ordination were the most commonly applied methods. Surprisingly, the types of analyses used were only related to the number of temporal replicates, but not to research aim or any other aspects of experimental design such as taxon, or habitat or year of study. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals that most studies interested in understanding community dynamics use relatively short time series meaning that several, more sophisticated, temporal analyses are not widely applicable. However, newer methods using multivariate dissimilarities are growing in popularity and many can be applied to time series of any length. PeerJ Inc. 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8038643/ /pubmed/33889452 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11250 Text en © 2021 Buckley et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Buckley, Hannah L.
Day, Nicola J.
Lear, Gavin
Case, Bradley S.
Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review
title Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review
title_full Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review
title_fullStr Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review
title_full_unstemmed Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review
title_short Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review
title_sort changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8038643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33889452
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11250
work_keys_str_mv AT buckleyhannahl changesintheanalysisoftemporalcommunitydynamicsdataa29yearliteraturereview
AT daynicolaj changesintheanalysisoftemporalcommunitydynamicsdataa29yearliteraturereview
AT leargavin changesintheanalysisoftemporalcommunitydynamicsdataa29yearliteraturereview
AT casebradleys changesintheanalysisoftemporalcommunitydynamicsdataa29yearliteraturereview