Cargando…

Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: There is a high prevalence of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between physicians and industry. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis examining the completeness of self-reported financial COI disclosures by physicians, and identify factors associated with non...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taheri, Cameron, Kirubarajan, Abirami, Li, Xinglin, Lam, Andrew C L, Taheri, Sam, Olivieri, Nancy F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039229/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045306
_version_ 1783677544710537216
author Taheri, Cameron
Kirubarajan, Abirami
Li, Xinglin
Lam, Andrew C L
Taheri, Sam
Olivieri, Nancy F
author_facet Taheri, Cameron
Kirubarajan, Abirami
Li, Xinglin
Lam, Andrew C L
Taheri, Sam
Olivieri, Nancy F
author_sort Taheri, Cameron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a high prevalence of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between physicians and industry. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis examining the completeness of self-reported financial COI disclosures by physicians, and identify factors associated with non-disclosure. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO were searched for eligible studies up to April 2020 and supplemented with material identified in the references and citing articles. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were independently abstracted by two authors. Data synthesis was performed via systematic review of eligible studies and random-effects meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The proportion of discrepancies between physician self-reported disclosures and objective payment data was the main outcome. The proportion of discrepant funds and factors associated with non-disclosure were also examined. RESULTS: 40 studies were included. The pooled proportion of COI discrepancies at the article level was 81% (range: 54%–98%; 95% CI 72% to 89%), 79% at the payment level (range: 71%–89%; 95% CI 67% to 89%), 93% at the authorship level (range: 71%–100%; 95% CI 79% to 100%) and 66% at the author level (range: 8%–99%; 95% CI 48% to 78%). The proportion of funds discrepant was 33% (range: 2%–77%; 95% CI 12% to 58%). There was high heterogeneity between studies across all five analyses (I(2)=94%–99%). Most undisclosed COI were related to food and beverage, or travel and lodging. While the most common explanation for failure to disclose was perceived irrelevance, a median of 45% of non-disclosed payments were directly or indirectly related to the work. A smaller monetary amount was the most common factor associated with nondisclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Physician self-reports of financial COI are highly discrepant with objective data sources reporting payments from industry. Stronger policies are required to reduce reliance on physician self-reporting of financial COI and address non-compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80392292021-04-26 Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review Taheri, Cameron Kirubarajan, Abirami Li, Xinglin Lam, Andrew C L Taheri, Sam Olivieri, Nancy F BMJ Open Ethics BACKGROUND: There is a high prevalence of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between physicians and industry. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis examining the completeness of self-reported financial COI disclosures by physicians, and identify factors associated with non-disclosure. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO were searched for eligible studies up to April 2020 and supplemented with material identified in the references and citing articles. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were independently abstracted by two authors. Data synthesis was performed via systematic review of eligible studies and random-effects meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The proportion of discrepancies between physician self-reported disclosures and objective payment data was the main outcome. The proportion of discrepant funds and factors associated with non-disclosure were also examined. RESULTS: 40 studies were included. The pooled proportion of COI discrepancies at the article level was 81% (range: 54%–98%; 95% CI 72% to 89%), 79% at the payment level (range: 71%–89%; 95% CI 67% to 89%), 93% at the authorship level (range: 71%–100%; 95% CI 79% to 100%) and 66% at the author level (range: 8%–99%; 95% CI 48% to 78%). The proportion of funds discrepant was 33% (range: 2%–77%; 95% CI 12% to 58%). There was high heterogeneity between studies across all five analyses (I(2)=94%–99%). Most undisclosed COI were related to food and beverage, or travel and lodging. While the most common explanation for failure to disclose was perceived irrelevance, a median of 45% of non-disclosed payments were directly or indirectly related to the work. A smaller monetary amount was the most common factor associated with nondisclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Physician self-reports of financial COI are highly discrepant with objective data sources reporting payments from industry. Stronger policies are required to reduce reliance on physician self-reporting of financial COI and address non-compliance. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8039229/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045306 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ethics
Taheri, Cameron
Kirubarajan, Abirami
Li, Xinglin
Lam, Andrew C L
Taheri, Sam
Olivieri, Nancy F
Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_full Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_fullStr Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_short Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_sort discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039229/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045306
work_keys_str_mv AT tahericameron discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT kirubarajanabirami discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT lixinglin discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT lamandrewcl discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT taherisam discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT olivierinancyf discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview