Cargando…

Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that manifests in patients with a variety of symptoms and signs such as ocular pain, visual issues, rapid tear evaporation and/or decreased tear production. It is a global health problem and is the leading cause of optometry and ophthalmology clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Minji, Lee, Yonghoon, Mehra, Divy, Sabater, Alfonso L, Galor, Anat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000697
_version_ 1783677548199149568
author Kim, Minji
Lee, Yonghoon
Mehra, Divy
Sabater, Alfonso L
Galor, Anat
author_facet Kim, Minji
Lee, Yonghoon
Mehra, Divy
Sabater, Alfonso L
Galor, Anat
author_sort Kim, Minji
collection PubMed
description Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that manifests in patients with a variety of symptoms and signs such as ocular pain, visual issues, rapid tear evaporation and/or decreased tear production. It is a global health problem and is the leading cause of optometry and ophthalmology clinic visits. The mainstay therapy for DED is artificial tears (ATs), which mimics tears and improves tear stability and properties. ATs have been found to improve symptoms and signs of disease in all DED subtypes, including aqueous deficient DED and evaporative DED. However, given the heterogeneity of DED, it is not surprising that ATs are not effective in all patients. When AT fails to relieve symptoms and/or signs of DED, it is critical to identify the underlying contributors to disease and escalate therapy appropriately. This includes underlying systemic diseases, meibomian gland dysfunction, anatomical abnormalities and neuropathic dysfunction. Thus, this review will discuss the benefits and limitations of ATs and review conditions when escalation of therapy should be considered in DED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80392492021-04-26 Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer Kim, Minji Lee, Yonghoon Mehra, Divy Sabater, Alfonso L Galor, Anat BMJ Open Ophthalmol Review Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that manifests in patients with a variety of symptoms and signs such as ocular pain, visual issues, rapid tear evaporation and/or decreased tear production. It is a global health problem and is the leading cause of optometry and ophthalmology clinic visits. The mainstay therapy for DED is artificial tears (ATs), which mimics tears and improves tear stability and properties. ATs have been found to improve symptoms and signs of disease in all DED subtypes, including aqueous deficient DED and evaporative DED. However, given the heterogeneity of DED, it is not surprising that ATs are not effective in all patients. When AT fails to relieve symptoms and/or signs of DED, it is critical to identify the underlying contributors to disease and escalate therapy appropriately. This includes underlying systemic diseases, meibomian gland dysfunction, anatomical abnormalities and neuropathic dysfunction. Thus, this review will discuss the benefits and limitations of ATs and review conditions when escalation of therapy should be considered in DED. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8039249/ /pubmed/33907713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000697 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Kim, Minji
Lee, Yonghoon
Mehra, Divy
Sabater, Alfonso L
Galor, Anat
Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
title Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
title_full Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
title_fullStr Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
title_full_unstemmed Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
title_short Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
title_sort dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000697
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminji dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer
AT leeyonghoon dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer
AT mehradivy dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer
AT sabateralfonsol dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer
AT galoranat dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer