Cargando…
Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer
Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that manifests in patients with a variety of symptoms and signs such as ocular pain, visual issues, rapid tear evaporation and/or decreased tear production. It is a global health problem and is the leading cause of optometry and ophthalmology clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000697 |
_version_ | 1783677548199149568 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Minji Lee, Yonghoon Mehra, Divy Sabater, Alfonso L Galor, Anat |
author_facet | Kim, Minji Lee, Yonghoon Mehra, Divy Sabater, Alfonso L Galor, Anat |
author_sort | Kim, Minji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that manifests in patients with a variety of symptoms and signs such as ocular pain, visual issues, rapid tear evaporation and/or decreased tear production. It is a global health problem and is the leading cause of optometry and ophthalmology clinic visits. The mainstay therapy for DED is artificial tears (ATs), which mimics tears and improves tear stability and properties. ATs have been found to improve symptoms and signs of disease in all DED subtypes, including aqueous deficient DED and evaporative DED. However, given the heterogeneity of DED, it is not surprising that ATs are not effective in all patients. When AT fails to relieve symptoms and/or signs of DED, it is critical to identify the underlying contributors to disease and escalate therapy appropriately. This includes underlying systemic diseases, meibomian gland dysfunction, anatomical abnormalities and neuropathic dysfunction. Thus, this review will discuss the benefits and limitations of ATs and review conditions when escalation of therapy should be considered in DED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8039249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80392492021-04-26 Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer Kim, Minji Lee, Yonghoon Mehra, Divy Sabater, Alfonso L Galor, Anat BMJ Open Ophthalmol Review Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that manifests in patients with a variety of symptoms and signs such as ocular pain, visual issues, rapid tear evaporation and/or decreased tear production. It is a global health problem and is the leading cause of optometry and ophthalmology clinic visits. The mainstay therapy for DED is artificial tears (ATs), which mimics tears and improves tear stability and properties. ATs have been found to improve symptoms and signs of disease in all DED subtypes, including aqueous deficient DED and evaporative DED. However, given the heterogeneity of DED, it is not surprising that ATs are not effective in all patients. When AT fails to relieve symptoms and/or signs of DED, it is critical to identify the underlying contributors to disease and escalate therapy appropriately. This includes underlying systemic diseases, meibomian gland dysfunction, anatomical abnormalities and neuropathic dysfunction. Thus, this review will discuss the benefits and limitations of ATs and review conditions when escalation of therapy should be considered in DED. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8039249/ /pubmed/33907713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000697 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Kim, Minji Lee, Yonghoon Mehra, Divy Sabater, Alfonso L Galor, Anat Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer |
title | Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer |
title_full | Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer |
title_fullStr | Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer |
title_full_unstemmed | Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer |
title_short | Dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer |
title_sort | dry eye: why artificial tears are not always the answer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimminji dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer AT leeyonghoon dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer AT mehradivy dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer AT sabateralfonsol dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer AT galoranat dryeyewhyartificialtearsarenotalwaystheanswer |