Cargando…

HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis

INTRODUCTION: Haemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common anorectal disorders, which affects nearly half of the general population. Treatment of grade III haemorrhoids consists initially of conservative measures, followed by rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy when unsuccessful. Given the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dekker, Lisette, Han-Geurts, Ingrid J M, van Dieren, Susan, Bemelman, Willem A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046836
_version_ 1783677549151256576
author Dekker, Lisette
Han-Geurts, Ingrid J M
van Dieren, Susan
Bemelman, Willem A
author_facet Dekker, Lisette
Han-Geurts, Ingrid J M
van Dieren, Susan
Bemelman, Willem A
author_sort Dekker, Lisette
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Haemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common anorectal disorders, which affects nearly half of the general population. Treatment of grade III haemorrhoids consists initially of conservative measures, followed by rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy when unsuccessful. Given the current guidelines and numerous modalities the obvious question which needs to be answered is which treatment is the best for grade III haemorrhoids. There is a need for evaluating treatment from the patient’s point of view and transparency in surgical and non-surgical treatment outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial with cost–utility analysis compares haemorrhoidectomy with rubber band ligation. Patients aged 18 years and older with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III are recruited. Primary outcome measure is quality of life at 24 months measured with the EQ-5D-5L and in-hospital (in)direct costs and out-of-hospital postoperative costs. A key secondary outcome is recurrence at 1-year postprocedure. Secondary outcomes are complaint reduction with proctology-specific patient-reported outcome measurements (Haemorrhoid Severity Score, ProctoPROM, PROM-HISS, vaizey score), resumption of work, pain and complication rates. Data are collected at seven different time points. Standard postprocedural care is followed. A sample size has been calculated using a one sided alpha of 0.025 and a power of 80% with an SD of 0.15 and a non-inferiority limit of 0.05. With stratification by centre and to adjust for 10% lost to follow-up the total sample size will be 360 patients in total (180 per group). Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat and the per-protocol principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences, whether they are positive, negative or inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT04621695, NTR8020
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80392532021-04-26 HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis Dekker, Lisette Han-Geurts, Ingrid J M van Dieren, Susan Bemelman, Willem A BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Haemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common anorectal disorders, which affects nearly half of the general population. Treatment of grade III haemorrhoids consists initially of conservative measures, followed by rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy when unsuccessful. Given the current guidelines and numerous modalities the obvious question which needs to be answered is which treatment is the best for grade III haemorrhoids. There is a need for evaluating treatment from the patient’s point of view and transparency in surgical and non-surgical treatment outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial with cost–utility analysis compares haemorrhoidectomy with rubber band ligation. Patients aged 18 years and older with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III are recruited. Primary outcome measure is quality of life at 24 months measured with the EQ-5D-5L and in-hospital (in)direct costs and out-of-hospital postoperative costs. A key secondary outcome is recurrence at 1-year postprocedure. Secondary outcomes are complaint reduction with proctology-specific patient-reported outcome measurements (Haemorrhoid Severity Score, ProctoPROM, PROM-HISS, vaizey score), resumption of work, pain and complication rates. Data are collected at seven different time points. Standard postprocedural care is followed. A sample size has been calculated using a one sided alpha of 0.025 and a power of 80% with an SD of 0.15 and a non-inferiority limit of 0.05. With stratification by centre and to adjust for 10% lost to follow-up the total sample size will be 360 patients in total (180 per group). Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat and the per-protocol principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences, whether they are positive, negative or inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT04621695, NTR8020 BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8039253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046836 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Dekker, Lisette
Han-Geurts, Ingrid J M
van Dieren, Susan
Bemelman, Willem A
HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis
title HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis
title_full HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis
title_fullStr HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis
title_short HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis
title_sort holland trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade iii: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046836
work_keys_str_mv AT dekkerlisette hollandtrialcomparisonofrubberbandligationandhaemorrhoidectomyinpatientswithsymptomatichaemorrhoidsgradeiiistudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandcostutilityanalysis
AT hangeurtsingridjm hollandtrialcomparisonofrubberbandligationandhaemorrhoidectomyinpatientswithsymptomatichaemorrhoidsgradeiiistudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandcostutilityanalysis
AT vandierensusan hollandtrialcomparisonofrubberbandligationandhaemorrhoidectomyinpatientswithsymptomatichaemorrhoidsgradeiiistudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandcostutilityanalysis
AT bemelmanwillema hollandtrialcomparisonofrubberbandligationandhaemorrhoidectomyinpatientswithsymptomatichaemorrhoidsgradeiiistudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandcostutilityanalysis
AT hollandtrialcomparisonofrubberbandligationandhaemorrhoidectomyinpatientswithsymptomatichaemorrhoidsgradeiiistudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandcostutilityanalysis