Cargando…

'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study

OBJECTIVES: The evolution of healthcare and biomedical research into data-rich fields has raised several questions concerning data ownership. In this paper, we aimed to analyse the perspectives of Swiss experts on the topic of health data ownership and control. DESIGN: In our qualitative study, we s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martani, Andrea, Geneviève, Lester Darryl, Elger, Bernice, Wangmo, Tenzin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039276/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045717
_version_ 1783677553600364544
author Martani, Andrea
Geneviève, Lester Darryl
Elger, Bernice
Wangmo, Tenzin
author_facet Martani, Andrea
Geneviève, Lester Darryl
Elger, Bernice
Wangmo, Tenzin
author_sort Martani, Andrea
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The evolution of healthcare and biomedical research into data-rich fields has raised several questions concerning data ownership. In this paper, we aimed to analyse the perspectives of Swiss experts on the topic of health data ownership and control. DESIGN: In our qualitative study, we selected participants through purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and then analysed thematically. SETTING: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person, via phone or online. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 48 experts (researchers, policy makers and other stakeholders) of the Swiss health-data framework. RESULTS: We identified different themes linked to data ownership. These include: (1) the data owner: data-subjects versus data-processors; (2) uncertainty about data ownership; (3) labour as a justification for data ownership and (4) the market value of data. Our results suggest that experts from Switzerland are still divided about who should be the data owner and also about what ownership would exactly mean. There is ambivalence between the willingness to acknowledge patients as the data owners and the fact that the effort made by data-processors (eg, researchers) to collect and manage the data entitles them to assert ownership claims towards the data themselves. Altogether, a tendency to speak about data in market terms also emerged. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a satisfactory account of data ownership as a concept to organise the relationship between data-subjects, data-processors and data themselves is an important endeavour for Switzerland and other countries who are developing data governance in the healthcare and research domains. Setting clearer rules on who owns data and on what ownership exactly entails would be important. If this proves unfeasible, the idea that health data cannot truly belong to anyone could be promoted. However, this will not be easy, as data are seen as an asset to control and profit from.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80392762021-04-26 'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study Martani, Andrea Geneviève, Lester Darryl Elger, Bernice Wangmo, Tenzin BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVES: The evolution of healthcare and biomedical research into data-rich fields has raised several questions concerning data ownership. In this paper, we aimed to analyse the perspectives of Swiss experts on the topic of health data ownership and control. DESIGN: In our qualitative study, we selected participants through purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and then analysed thematically. SETTING: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person, via phone or online. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 48 experts (researchers, policy makers and other stakeholders) of the Swiss health-data framework. RESULTS: We identified different themes linked to data ownership. These include: (1) the data owner: data-subjects versus data-processors; (2) uncertainty about data ownership; (3) labour as a justification for data ownership and (4) the market value of data. Our results suggest that experts from Switzerland are still divided about who should be the data owner and also about what ownership would exactly mean. There is ambivalence between the willingness to acknowledge patients as the data owners and the fact that the effort made by data-processors (eg, researchers) to collect and manage the data entitles them to assert ownership claims towards the data themselves. Altogether, a tendency to speak about data in market terms also emerged. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a satisfactory account of data ownership as a concept to organise the relationship between data-subjects, data-processors and data themselves is an important endeavour for Switzerland and other countries who are developing data governance in the healthcare and research domains. Setting clearer rules on who owns data and on what ownership exactly entails would be important. If this proves unfeasible, the idea that health data cannot truly belong to anyone could be promoted. However, this will not be easy, as data are seen as an asset to control and profit from. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8039276/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045717 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ethics
Martani, Andrea
Geneviève, Lester Darryl
Elger, Bernice
Wangmo, Tenzin
'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
title 'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
title_full 'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
title_fullStr 'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
title_full_unstemmed 'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
title_short 'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
title_sort 'it’s not something you can take in your hands'. swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039276/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045717
work_keys_str_mv AT martaniandrea itsnotsomethingyoucantakeinyourhandsswissexpertsperspectivesonhealthdataownershipaninterviewbasedstudy
AT genevievelesterdarryl itsnotsomethingyoucantakeinyourhandsswissexpertsperspectivesonhealthdataownershipaninterviewbasedstudy
AT elgerbernice itsnotsomethingyoucantakeinyourhandsswissexpertsperspectivesonhealthdataownershipaninterviewbasedstudy
AT wangmotenzin itsnotsomethingyoucantakeinyourhandsswissexpertsperspectivesonhealthdataownershipaninterviewbasedstudy