Cargando…

Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)

Three medetomidine-based drug protocols were compared by evaluating time courses, reliability and physiological effects in wild boars. A total of 21 cage-trapped wild boars (Sus scrofa) were immobilized using one of the following drug combinations; MTZ: medetomidine (0.2 mg/kg) + tiletamine-zolazepa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morelli, Jacopo, Rossi, Sophie, Fuchs, Boris, Richard, Emmanuelle, Barros, Daniela S. B., Küker, Susanne, Arnemo, Jon M., Evans, Alina L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855059
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.655345
_version_ 1783677563382530048
author Morelli, Jacopo
Rossi, Sophie
Fuchs, Boris
Richard, Emmanuelle
Barros, Daniela S. B.
Küker, Susanne
Arnemo, Jon M.
Evans, Alina L.
author_facet Morelli, Jacopo
Rossi, Sophie
Fuchs, Boris
Richard, Emmanuelle
Barros, Daniela S. B.
Küker, Susanne
Arnemo, Jon M.
Evans, Alina L.
author_sort Morelli, Jacopo
collection PubMed
description Three medetomidine-based drug protocols were compared by evaluating time courses, reliability and physiological effects in wild boars. A total of 21 cage-trapped wild boars (Sus scrofa) were immobilized using one of the following drug combinations; MTZ: medetomidine (0.2 mg/kg) + tiletamine-zolazepam (2.0 mg/kg), MK: medetomidine (0.15 mg/kg) + ketamine (5 mg/kg), and MKB: medetomidine (0.1 mg/kg) + ketamine (5.0 mg/kg) + butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg). Induction time, recovery time, and physiological variables were recorded and arterial blood gas analysis measured twice, before and after 15 min of oxygen supplementation (0.5–1.0 L/min). For reversal, 4 mg of atipamezole per mg of medetomidine was administered intramuscularly. The boars recovered in the cage and were released once ataxia resolved. The MK group had significantly longer recovery times (mean 164 min ± 79 SD) compared to the other groups. MKB elicited longer and incomplete induction compared to the other groups (mean induction time 20 min ± 10 SD), decreasing the efficiency of the capture and increasing the risk of hyperthermia. Both ketamine-based protocols required additional ketamine intramuscularly to prolong the anesthesia after 20–40 min from induction. Agreement between the pulse oximeter and the blood gas analyzer was low, with the pulse oximeter underestimating the real values of arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation, particularly at higher readings. Mild acute respiratory acidosis (PaCO(2) 45–60 mmHg) and mild to moderate hypoxemia (PaO(2) 69–80 mmHg) occurred in most boars, regardless of the treatment group but especially in the MKB group. The acid-base status improved and hypoxemia resolved in all boars during oxygen supplementation, with the PaO(2) rising above the physiological reference range (81.6–107.7 mmHg) in many individuals. MK and MKB induced safe and reliable immobilization of wild boars for at least 20 min. Supplemental oxygen delivery is recommended in order to prevent hypoxemia in wild boars immobilized with the protocols used in the present study. Long and ataxic recoveries occurred in most animals, regardless of the protocol, but especially in the MKB group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80393182021-04-13 Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) Morelli, Jacopo Rossi, Sophie Fuchs, Boris Richard, Emmanuelle Barros, Daniela S. B. Küker, Susanne Arnemo, Jon M. Evans, Alina L. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Three medetomidine-based drug protocols were compared by evaluating time courses, reliability and physiological effects in wild boars. A total of 21 cage-trapped wild boars (Sus scrofa) were immobilized using one of the following drug combinations; MTZ: medetomidine (0.2 mg/kg) + tiletamine-zolazepam (2.0 mg/kg), MK: medetomidine (0.15 mg/kg) + ketamine (5 mg/kg), and MKB: medetomidine (0.1 mg/kg) + ketamine (5.0 mg/kg) + butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg). Induction time, recovery time, and physiological variables were recorded and arterial blood gas analysis measured twice, before and after 15 min of oxygen supplementation (0.5–1.0 L/min). For reversal, 4 mg of atipamezole per mg of medetomidine was administered intramuscularly. The boars recovered in the cage and were released once ataxia resolved. The MK group had significantly longer recovery times (mean 164 min ± 79 SD) compared to the other groups. MKB elicited longer and incomplete induction compared to the other groups (mean induction time 20 min ± 10 SD), decreasing the efficiency of the capture and increasing the risk of hyperthermia. Both ketamine-based protocols required additional ketamine intramuscularly to prolong the anesthesia after 20–40 min from induction. Agreement between the pulse oximeter and the blood gas analyzer was low, with the pulse oximeter underestimating the real values of arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation, particularly at higher readings. Mild acute respiratory acidosis (PaCO(2) 45–60 mmHg) and mild to moderate hypoxemia (PaO(2) 69–80 mmHg) occurred in most boars, regardless of the treatment group but especially in the MKB group. The acid-base status improved and hypoxemia resolved in all boars during oxygen supplementation, with the PaO(2) rising above the physiological reference range (81.6–107.7 mmHg) in many individuals. MK and MKB induced safe and reliable immobilization of wild boars for at least 20 min. Supplemental oxygen delivery is recommended in order to prevent hypoxemia in wild boars immobilized with the protocols used in the present study. Long and ataxic recoveries occurred in most animals, regardless of the protocol, but especially in the MKB group. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8039318/ /pubmed/33855059 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.655345 Text en Copyright © 2021 Morelli, Rossi, Fuchs, Richard, Barros, Küker, Arnemo and Evans. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Morelli, Jacopo
Rossi, Sophie
Fuchs, Boris
Richard, Emmanuelle
Barros, Daniela S. B.
Küker, Susanne
Arnemo, Jon M.
Evans, Alina L.
Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_full Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_fullStr Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_short Evaluation of Three Medetomidine-Based Anesthetic Protocols in Free-Ranging Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)
title_sort evaluation of three medetomidine-based anesthetic protocols in free-ranging wild boars (sus scrofa)
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33855059
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.655345
work_keys_str_mv AT morellijacopo evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa
AT rossisophie evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa
AT fuchsboris evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa
AT richardemmanuelle evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa
AT barrosdanielasb evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa
AT kukersusanne evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa
AT arnemojonm evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa
AT evansalinal evaluationofthreemedetomidinebasedanestheticprotocolsinfreerangingwildboarssusscrofa