Cargando…

A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder

This study reports follow-up data on the largest sample to date of boys clinic-referred for gender dysphoria (n = 139) with regard to gender identity and sexual orientation. In childhood, the boys were assessed at a mean age of 7.49 years (range, 3.33–12.99) at a mean year of 1989 and followed-up at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Devita, Bradley, Susan J., Zucker, Kenneth J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33854450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632784
_version_ 1783677580656771072
author Singh, Devita
Bradley, Susan J.
Zucker, Kenneth J.
author_facet Singh, Devita
Bradley, Susan J.
Zucker, Kenneth J.
author_sort Singh, Devita
collection PubMed
description This study reports follow-up data on the largest sample to date of boys clinic-referred for gender dysphoria (n = 139) with regard to gender identity and sexual orientation. In childhood, the boys were assessed at a mean age of 7.49 years (range, 3.33–12.99) at a mean year of 1989 and followed-up at a mean age of 20.58 years (range, 13.07–39.15) at a mean year of 2002. In childhood, 88 (63.3%) of the boys met the DSM-III, III-R, or IV criteria for gender identity disorder; the remaining 51 (36.7%) boys were subthreshold for the criteria. At follow-up, gender identity/dysphoria was assessed via multiple methods and the participants were classified as either persisters or desisters. Sexual orientation was ascertained for both fantasy and behavior and then dichotomized as either biphilic/androphilic or gynephilic. Of the 139 participants, 17 (12.2%) were classified as persisters and the remaining 122 (87.8%) were classified as desisters. Data on sexual orientation in fantasy were available for 129 participants: 82 (63.6%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 43 (33.3%) were classified as gynephilic, and 4 (3.1%) reported no sexual fantasies. For sexual orientation in behavior, data were available for 108 participants: 51 (47.2%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 29 (26.9%) were classified as gynephilic, and 28 (25.9%) reported no sexual behaviors. Multinomial logistic regression examined predictors of outcome for the biphilic/androphilic persisters and the gynephilic desisters, with the biphilic/androphilic desisters as the reference group. Compared to the reference group, the biphilic/androphilic persisters tended to be older at the time of the assessment in childhood, were from a lower social class background, and, on a dimensional composite of sex-typed behavior in childhood were more gender-variant. The biphilic/androphilic desisters were more gender-variant compared to the gynephilic desisters. Boys clinic-referred for gender identity concerns in childhood had a high rate of desistance and a high rate of a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation. The implications of the data for current models of care for the treatment of gender dysphoria in children are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80393932021-04-13 A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder Singh, Devita Bradley, Susan J. Zucker, Kenneth J. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry This study reports follow-up data on the largest sample to date of boys clinic-referred for gender dysphoria (n = 139) with regard to gender identity and sexual orientation. In childhood, the boys were assessed at a mean age of 7.49 years (range, 3.33–12.99) at a mean year of 1989 and followed-up at a mean age of 20.58 years (range, 13.07–39.15) at a mean year of 2002. In childhood, 88 (63.3%) of the boys met the DSM-III, III-R, or IV criteria for gender identity disorder; the remaining 51 (36.7%) boys were subthreshold for the criteria. At follow-up, gender identity/dysphoria was assessed via multiple methods and the participants were classified as either persisters or desisters. Sexual orientation was ascertained for both fantasy and behavior and then dichotomized as either biphilic/androphilic or gynephilic. Of the 139 participants, 17 (12.2%) were classified as persisters and the remaining 122 (87.8%) were classified as desisters. Data on sexual orientation in fantasy were available for 129 participants: 82 (63.6%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 43 (33.3%) were classified as gynephilic, and 4 (3.1%) reported no sexual fantasies. For sexual orientation in behavior, data were available for 108 participants: 51 (47.2%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 29 (26.9%) were classified as gynephilic, and 28 (25.9%) reported no sexual behaviors. Multinomial logistic regression examined predictors of outcome for the biphilic/androphilic persisters and the gynephilic desisters, with the biphilic/androphilic desisters as the reference group. Compared to the reference group, the biphilic/androphilic persisters tended to be older at the time of the assessment in childhood, were from a lower social class background, and, on a dimensional composite of sex-typed behavior in childhood were more gender-variant. The biphilic/androphilic desisters were more gender-variant compared to the gynephilic desisters. Boys clinic-referred for gender identity concerns in childhood had a high rate of desistance and a high rate of a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation. The implications of the data for current models of care for the treatment of gender dysphoria in children are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8039393/ /pubmed/33854450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632784 Text en Copyright © 2021 Singh, Bradley and Zucker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Singh, Devita
Bradley, Susan J.
Zucker, Kenneth J.
A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder
title A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder
title_full A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder
title_fullStr A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder
title_full_unstemmed A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder
title_short A Follow-Up Study of Boys With Gender Identity Disorder
title_sort follow-up study of boys with gender identity disorder
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33854450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632784
work_keys_str_mv AT singhdevita afollowupstudyofboyswithgenderidentitydisorder
AT bradleysusanj afollowupstudyofboyswithgenderidentitydisorder
AT zuckerkennethj afollowupstudyofboyswithgenderidentitydisorder
AT singhdevita followupstudyofboyswithgenderidentitydisorder
AT bradleysusanj followupstudyofboyswithgenderidentitydisorder
AT zuckerkennethj followupstudyofboyswithgenderidentitydisorder