Cargando…

Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks

PURPOSE: The dorsal attention network (DAN) and the ventral attention network (VAN) are known to support visual attention, but the influences of ocular dominance on the attention networks are unclear. We aimed to explore how visual cortical asymmetry of the attention networks correlate with neurophy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Sinan, Zhao, Bingyang, Shi, Chaoqun, Ma, Xuying, Sabel, Bernhard A., Chen, Xiping, Tao, Luyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33825854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.4.9
_version_ 1783677597873340416
author Liu, Sinan
Zhao, Bingyang
Shi, Chaoqun
Ma, Xuying
Sabel, Bernhard A.
Chen, Xiping
Tao, Luyang
author_facet Liu, Sinan
Zhao, Bingyang
Shi, Chaoqun
Ma, Xuying
Sabel, Bernhard A.
Chen, Xiping
Tao, Luyang
author_sort Liu, Sinan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The dorsal attention network (DAN) and the ventral attention network (VAN) are known to support visual attention, but the influences of ocular dominance on the attention networks are unclear. We aimed to explore how visual cortical asymmetry of the attention networks correlate with neurophysiological oscillation and connectivity markers of attentional processes. METHODS: An oddball task with concentric circle stimuli of three different sizes (i.e., spot size of 5°, 20°, or 30° of visual angle) was used to vary task difficulty. Event-related oscillations and interareal communication were tested with an electroencephalogram-based visual evoked components as a function of ocular dominance in 30 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Accuracy rates were higher in the dominant eyes compared with the nondominant eyes. Compared with the nondominant eyes, the dominant eyes had higher theta, low-alpha, and low-beta powers and lower high-alpha powers within the nodes of VAN and DAN. Furthermore, visual information processed by the dominant and nondominant eye had different fates, that is, the dominant eyes mainly relied on theta and low-alpha connectivity within both the VAN and the DAN, whereas the nondominant eyes mainly relied on theta connectivity within the VAN and high-alpha connectivity within the DAN. The difference in accuracy rate between the two eyes was correlated with the low-alpha oscillations in the anterior DAN area and low-alpha connectivity of the left DAN. CONCLUSIONS: The ocular dominance processing and interareal communication reveal a cortical asymmetry underlying attention, and this reflects a two-way modulatory mechanism within attention networks in the human brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80394712021-04-20 Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks Liu, Sinan Zhao, Bingyang Shi, Chaoqun Ma, Xuying Sabel, Bernhard A. Chen, Xiping Tao, Luyang Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Visual Neuroscience PURPOSE: The dorsal attention network (DAN) and the ventral attention network (VAN) are known to support visual attention, but the influences of ocular dominance on the attention networks are unclear. We aimed to explore how visual cortical asymmetry of the attention networks correlate with neurophysiological oscillation and connectivity markers of attentional processes. METHODS: An oddball task with concentric circle stimuli of three different sizes (i.e., spot size of 5°, 20°, or 30° of visual angle) was used to vary task difficulty. Event-related oscillations and interareal communication were tested with an electroencephalogram-based visual evoked components as a function of ocular dominance in 30 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Accuracy rates were higher in the dominant eyes compared with the nondominant eyes. Compared with the nondominant eyes, the dominant eyes had higher theta, low-alpha, and low-beta powers and lower high-alpha powers within the nodes of VAN and DAN. Furthermore, visual information processed by the dominant and nondominant eye had different fates, that is, the dominant eyes mainly relied on theta and low-alpha connectivity within both the VAN and the DAN, whereas the nondominant eyes mainly relied on theta connectivity within the VAN and high-alpha connectivity within the DAN. The difference in accuracy rate between the two eyes was correlated with the low-alpha oscillations in the anterior DAN area and low-alpha connectivity of the left DAN. CONCLUSIONS: The ocular dominance processing and interareal communication reveal a cortical asymmetry underlying attention, and this reflects a two-way modulatory mechanism within attention networks in the human brain. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8039471/ /pubmed/33825854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.4.9 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Visual Neuroscience
Liu, Sinan
Zhao, Bingyang
Shi, Chaoqun
Ma, Xuying
Sabel, Bernhard A.
Chen, Xiping
Tao, Luyang
Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks
title Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks
title_full Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks
title_fullStr Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks
title_full_unstemmed Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks
title_short Ocular Dominance and Functional Asymmetry in Visual Attention Networks
title_sort ocular dominance and functional asymmetry in visual attention networks
topic Visual Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33825854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.4.9
work_keys_str_mv AT liusinan oculardominanceandfunctionalasymmetryinvisualattentionnetworks
AT zhaobingyang oculardominanceandfunctionalasymmetryinvisualattentionnetworks
AT shichaoqun oculardominanceandfunctionalasymmetryinvisualattentionnetworks
AT maxuying oculardominanceandfunctionalasymmetryinvisualattentionnetworks
AT sabelbernharda oculardominanceandfunctionalasymmetryinvisualattentionnetworks
AT chenxiping oculardominanceandfunctionalasymmetryinvisualattentionnetworks
AT taoluyang oculardominanceandfunctionalasymmetryinvisualattentionnetworks