Cargando…

Development of Chinese odor identification test

BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction significantly reduces quality of life, with a prevalence as high as 20% in the general adult population. Odor identification (OI) tests are culturally dependent and widely used in clinical and epidemiological evaluations of olfaction. We aimed to develop a Chinese o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Baihan, Wu, Dawei, Wei, Yongxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850896
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-913
_version_ 1783677654253174784
author Su, Baihan
Wu, Dawei
Wei, Yongxiang
author_facet Su, Baihan
Wu, Dawei
Wei, Yongxiang
author_sort Su, Baihan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction significantly reduces quality of life, with a prevalence as high as 20% in the general adult population. Odor identification (OI) tests are culturally dependent and widely used in clinical and epidemiological evaluations of olfaction. We aimed to develop a Chinese odor identification test (COIT) based on the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test. METHODS: Patients (n=60) with olfactory disorders and healthy controls (n=404) were recruited in the Smell and Taste Center of a tertiary-care university hospital. Unfamiliar odors in the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test were replaced to create a 16-item COIT, which was validated with a simplified Chinese version of the Cross-culture Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) and Sniffin’ Sticks. A test-retest reliability of COIT was also conducted. RESULTS: Six odors with a correct recognition rate <75% were replaced with familiar odors for Chinese. The COIT score significantly correlated with both Sniffin’ Sticks (r=0.755 P<0.0001) and CC-SIT score (r=0.7462 P<0.0001). Based on the testing results of an additional 120 subjects, we concluded that scores of 12–16, 7–11, and 0–6 corresponded to normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia, respectively. The 3-month test-retest-reliability coefficient was as high as 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: The COIT is an effective tool for assessing olfactory function in the Chinese population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80397112021-04-12 Development of Chinese odor identification test Su, Baihan Wu, Dawei Wei, Yongxiang Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction significantly reduces quality of life, with a prevalence as high as 20% in the general adult population. Odor identification (OI) tests are culturally dependent and widely used in clinical and epidemiological evaluations of olfaction. We aimed to develop a Chinese odor identification test (COIT) based on the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test. METHODS: Patients (n=60) with olfactory disorders and healthy controls (n=404) were recruited in the Smell and Taste Center of a tertiary-care university hospital. Unfamiliar odors in the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test were replaced to create a 16-item COIT, which was validated with a simplified Chinese version of the Cross-culture Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) and Sniffin’ Sticks. A test-retest reliability of COIT was also conducted. RESULTS: Six odors with a correct recognition rate <75% were replaced with familiar odors for Chinese. The COIT score significantly correlated with both Sniffin’ Sticks (r=0.755 P<0.0001) and CC-SIT score (r=0.7462 P<0.0001). Based on the testing results of an additional 120 subjects, we concluded that scores of 12–16, 7–11, and 0–6 corresponded to normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia, respectively. The 3-month test-retest-reliability coefficient was as high as 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: The COIT is an effective tool for assessing olfactory function in the Chinese population. AME Publishing Company 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8039711/ /pubmed/33850896 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-913 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Su, Baihan
Wu, Dawei
Wei, Yongxiang
Development of Chinese odor identification test
title Development of Chinese odor identification test
title_full Development of Chinese odor identification test
title_fullStr Development of Chinese odor identification test
title_full_unstemmed Development of Chinese odor identification test
title_short Development of Chinese odor identification test
title_sort development of chinese odor identification test
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850896
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-913
work_keys_str_mv AT subaihan developmentofchineseodoridentificationtest
AT wudawei developmentofchineseodoridentificationtest
AT weiyongxiang developmentofchineseodoridentificationtest