Cargando…
Development of Chinese odor identification test
BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction significantly reduces quality of life, with a prevalence as high as 20% in the general adult population. Odor identification (OI) tests are culturally dependent and widely used in clinical and epidemiological evaluations of olfaction. We aimed to develop a Chinese o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850896 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-913 |
_version_ | 1783677654253174784 |
---|---|
author | Su, Baihan Wu, Dawei Wei, Yongxiang |
author_facet | Su, Baihan Wu, Dawei Wei, Yongxiang |
author_sort | Su, Baihan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction significantly reduces quality of life, with a prevalence as high as 20% in the general adult population. Odor identification (OI) tests are culturally dependent and widely used in clinical and epidemiological evaluations of olfaction. We aimed to develop a Chinese odor identification test (COIT) based on the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test. METHODS: Patients (n=60) with olfactory disorders and healthy controls (n=404) were recruited in the Smell and Taste Center of a tertiary-care university hospital. Unfamiliar odors in the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test were replaced to create a 16-item COIT, which was validated with a simplified Chinese version of the Cross-culture Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) and Sniffin’ Sticks. A test-retest reliability of COIT was also conducted. RESULTS: Six odors with a correct recognition rate <75% were replaced with familiar odors for Chinese. The COIT score significantly correlated with both Sniffin’ Sticks (r=0.755 P<0.0001) and CC-SIT score (r=0.7462 P<0.0001). Based on the testing results of an additional 120 subjects, we concluded that scores of 12–16, 7–11, and 0–6 corresponded to normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia, respectively. The 3-month test-retest-reliability coefficient was as high as 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: The COIT is an effective tool for assessing olfactory function in the Chinese population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8039711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80397112021-04-12 Development of Chinese odor identification test Su, Baihan Wu, Dawei Wei, Yongxiang Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction significantly reduces quality of life, with a prevalence as high as 20% in the general adult population. Odor identification (OI) tests are culturally dependent and widely used in clinical and epidemiological evaluations of olfaction. We aimed to develop a Chinese odor identification test (COIT) based on the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test. METHODS: Patients (n=60) with olfactory disorders and healthy controls (n=404) were recruited in the Smell and Taste Center of a tertiary-care university hospital. Unfamiliar odors in the Sniffin’ Sticks identification test were replaced to create a 16-item COIT, which was validated with a simplified Chinese version of the Cross-culture Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) and Sniffin’ Sticks. A test-retest reliability of COIT was also conducted. RESULTS: Six odors with a correct recognition rate <75% were replaced with familiar odors for Chinese. The COIT score significantly correlated with both Sniffin’ Sticks (r=0.755 P<0.0001) and CC-SIT score (r=0.7462 P<0.0001). Based on the testing results of an additional 120 subjects, we concluded that scores of 12–16, 7–11, and 0–6 corresponded to normosmia, hyposmia, and anosmia, respectively. The 3-month test-retest-reliability coefficient was as high as 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: The COIT is an effective tool for assessing olfactory function in the Chinese population. AME Publishing Company 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8039711/ /pubmed/33850896 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-913 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Su, Baihan Wu, Dawei Wei, Yongxiang Development of Chinese odor identification test |
title | Development of Chinese odor identification test |
title_full | Development of Chinese odor identification test |
title_fullStr | Development of Chinese odor identification test |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of Chinese odor identification test |
title_short | Development of Chinese odor identification test |
title_sort | development of chinese odor identification test |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850896 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-913 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subaihan developmentofchineseodoridentificationtest AT wudawei developmentofchineseodoridentificationtest AT weiyongxiang developmentofchineseodoridentificationtest |