Cargando…

Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers

AIM: The objective of the study was to assess the performance of CT Perfusion in comparison to CECT for preoperative detection of metastases to lymph nodes in squamous cell cancers of oral cavity. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with squamous cell cancers of oral cavity underwent CECT and CTP. Two rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suryavanshi, Shubham, Kumar, Jyoti, Manchanda, Alpana, Singh, Ishwar, Khurana, Nita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100339
_version_ 1783677677671022592
author Suryavanshi, Shubham
Kumar, Jyoti
Manchanda, Alpana
Singh, Ishwar
Khurana, Nita
author_facet Suryavanshi, Shubham
Kumar, Jyoti
Manchanda, Alpana
Singh, Ishwar
Khurana, Nita
author_sort Suryavanshi, Shubham
collection PubMed
description AIM: The objective of the study was to assess the performance of CT Perfusion in comparison to CECT for preoperative detection of metastases to lymph nodes in squamous cell cancers of oral cavity. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with squamous cell cancers of oral cavity underwent CECT and CTP. Two radiologists evaluated CECT and CTP parameters independently. Surgery and post-operative histopathology was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Level wise analysis of the largest node was done. 102 lymph nodes on CECT and 82 lymph nodes on CTP were correlated with post-operative histopathological findings. CECT had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 75 %, 98.6 % and 91.2 %(p-value <0.001) respectively in differentiating benign from metastatic nodes. Mean transit time[MTT] was significantly the most accurate CTP parameter and carried a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 90.5 %, 93.4 %, 92.7 % and 0.96 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of MTT was higher than the sensitivity of overall CECT. CONCLUSIONS: CTP is a promising tool for detection of metastatic cervical nodes in squamous cell cancers of the oral cavity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8039829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80398292021-04-12 Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers Suryavanshi, Shubham Kumar, Jyoti Manchanda, Alpana Singh, Ishwar Khurana, Nita Eur J Radiol Open Article AIM: The objective of the study was to assess the performance of CT Perfusion in comparison to CECT for preoperative detection of metastases to lymph nodes in squamous cell cancers of oral cavity. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with squamous cell cancers of oral cavity underwent CECT and CTP. Two radiologists evaluated CECT and CTP parameters independently. Surgery and post-operative histopathology was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Level wise analysis of the largest node was done. 102 lymph nodes on CECT and 82 lymph nodes on CTP were correlated with post-operative histopathological findings. CECT had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 75 %, 98.6 % and 91.2 %(p-value <0.001) respectively in differentiating benign from metastatic nodes. Mean transit time[MTT] was significantly the most accurate CTP parameter and carried a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 90.5 %, 93.4 %, 92.7 % and 0.96 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of MTT was higher than the sensitivity of overall CECT. CONCLUSIONS: CTP is a promising tool for detection of metastatic cervical nodes in squamous cell cancers of the oral cavity. Elsevier 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8039829/ /pubmed/33850970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100339 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Suryavanshi, Shubham
Kumar, Jyoti
Manchanda, Alpana
Singh, Ishwar
Khurana, Nita
Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_full Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_fullStr Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_short Comparison of CECT and CT perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
title_sort comparison of cect and ct perfusion in differentiating benign from malignant neck nodes in oral cavity cancers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8039829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100339
work_keys_str_mv AT suryavanshishubham comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT kumarjyoti comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT manchandaalpana comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT singhishwar comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers
AT khurananita comparisonofcectandctperfusionindifferentiatingbenignfrommalignantnecknodesinoralcavitycancers