Cargando…

Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS

Postmortem ethanol formation is a well-known problem in forensic toxicology. Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are ethanol metabolites that can be used to distinguish antemortem alcohol intake from postmortem formation of ethanol and in addition can be a helpful tool in assessment of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sidqey, Delvin, Liane, Veronica Horpestad, Kristoffersen, Lena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa108
_version_ 1783677772230557696
author Sidqey, Delvin
Liane, Veronica Horpestad
Kristoffersen, Lena
author_facet Sidqey, Delvin
Liane, Veronica Horpestad
Kristoffersen, Lena
author_sort Sidqey, Delvin
collection PubMed
description Postmortem ethanol formation is a well-known problem in forensic toxicology. Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are ethanol metabolites that can be used to distinguish antemortem alcohol intake from postmortem formation of ethanol and in addition can be a helpful tool in assessment of the hip-flask defense. To an aliquot of 100 µL whole blood, internal standard (IS) and water was added before protein precipitation treatment (PPT) with ice-cold acetonitrile (ACN). The supernatants were filtered through a 96-well phospholipid removal plate, evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in 150 µL water/ACN/formic acid (FA). Identification of compounds was performed using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in negative mode. Gradient elution was performed on a C18 column with methanol (MeOH) and 0.1% FA. The run time was 4.5 min, and 0.5 µL was injected on an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS-MS) instrument. Linearity was achieved (coefficient of determination (R(2)) ≥ 0.999) for EtG in the range of 0.089 to 22 mg/L (0.40–100 µM) and EtS 0.025 to 6.3 mg/L (0.20–50 µM). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.067 mg/L (0.30 µM) for EtG and 0.019 mg/L (0.15 µM) for EtS. Between assay accuracy was –15% to 8% and precision reported as relative standard deviation (RSD) was ≤ 4.5%. Precision, estimated as the RSD of the concentration difference between results from two independent analyses of authentic whole blood samples, was ≤ 6.7%. Recovery was ≥ 61% for EtG and ≥ 77% for EtS and matrix effects (ME) were 99% to 103%. Method comparison was carried out with a previously used UHPLC–MS-MS method, and satisfactory agreement was achieved, and external proficiency testing control samples had z-score < ± 1. The method has been used in routine work for more than 4 years analyzing about 6,000 antemortem and postmortem whole blood samples and has proven to be robust and reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8040375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80403752021-04-15 Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS Sidqey, Delvin Liane, Veronica Horpestad Kristoffersen, Lena J Anal Toxicol Article Postmortem ethanol formation is a well-known problem in forensic toxicology. Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are ethanol metabolites that can be used to distinguish antemortem alcohol intake from postmortem formation of ethanol and in addition can be a helpful tool in assessment of the hip-flask defense. To an aliquot of 100 µL whole blood, internal standard (IS) and water was added before protein precipitation treatment (PPT) with ice-cold acetonitrile (ACN). The supernatants were filtered through a 96-well phospholipid removal plate, evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in 150 µL water/ACN/formic acid (FA). Identification of compounds was performed using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in negative mode. Gradient elution was performed on a C18 column with methanol (MeOH) and 0.1% FA. The run time was 4.5 min, and 0.5 µL was injected on an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS-MS) instrument. Linearity was achieved (coefficient of determination (R(2)) ≥ 0.999) for EtG in the range of 0.089 to 22 mg/L (0.40–100 µM) and EtS 0.025 to 6.3 mg/L (0.20–50 µM). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.067 mg/L (0.30 µM) for EtG and 0.019 mg/L (0.15 µM) for EtS. Between assay accuracy was –15% to 8% and precision reported as relative standard deviation (RSD) was ≤ 4.5%. Precision, estimated as the RSD of the concentration difference between results from two independent analyses of authentic whole blood samples, was ≤ 6.7%. Recovery was ≥ 61% for EtG and ≥ 77% for EtS and matrix effects (ME) were 99% to 103%. Method comparison was carried out with a previously used UHPLC–MS-MS method, and satisfactory agreement was achieved, and external proficiency testing control samples had z-score < ± 1. The method has been used in routine work for more than 4 years analyzing about 6,000 antemortem and postmortem whole blood samples and has proven to be robust and reliable. Oxford University Press 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8040375/ /pubmed/32816025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa108 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Sidqey, Delvin
Liane, Veronica Horpestad
Kristoffersen, Lena
Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS
title Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS
title_full Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS
title_fullStr Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS
title_short Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC–MS-MS
title_sort quantitative determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem and antemortem whole blood using phospholipid removal 96-well plate and uhplc–ms-ms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32816025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaa108
work_keys_str_mv AT sidqeydelvin quantitativedeterminationofethylglucuronideandethylsulfateinpostmortemandantemortemwholebloodusingphospholipidremoval96wellplateanduhplcmsms
AT lianeveronicahorpestad quantitativedeterminationofethylglucuronideandethylsulfateinpostmortemandantemortemwholebloodusingphospholipidremoval96wellplateanduhplcmsms
AT kristoffersenlena quantitativedeterminationofethylglucuronideandethylsulfateinpostmortemandantemortemwholebloodusingphospholipidremoval96wellplateanduhplcmsms