Cargando…

Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity

Oil and gas wells with compromised integrity are a concern because they can potentially leak hydrocarbons or other fluids into groundwater and/or the atmosphere. Most states in the United States require some form of integrity testing, but few jurisdictions mandate widespread testing and open reporti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lackey, Greg, Rajaram, Harihar, Bolander, James, Sherwood, Owen A., Ryan, Joseph N., Shih, Chung Yan, Bromhal, Grant S., Dilmore, Robert M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013894118
_version_ 1783677823089639424
author Lackey, Greg
Rajaram, Harihar
Bolander, James
Sherwood, Owen A.
Ryan, Joseph N.
Shih, Chung Yan
Bromhal, Grant S.
Dilmore, Robert M.
author_facet Lackey, Greg
Rajaram, Harihar
Bolander, James
Sherwood, Owen A.
Ryan, Joseph N.
Shih, Chung Yan
Bromhal, Grant S.
Dilmore, Robert M.
author_sort Lackey, Greg
collection PubMed
description Oil and gas wells with compromised integrity are a concern because they can potentially leak hydrocarbons or other fluids into groundwater and/or the atmosphere. Most states in the United States require some form of integrity testing, but few jurisdictions mandate widespread testing and open reporting on a scale informative for leakage risk assessment. In this study, we searched 33 US state oil and gas regulatory agency databases and identified records useful for evaluating well integrity in Colorado, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania. In total, we compiled 474,621 testing records from 105,031 wells across these states into a uniform dataset. We found that 14.1% of wells tested prior to 2018 in Pennsylvania exhibited sustained casing pressure (SCP) or casing vent flow (CVF)—two indicators of compromised well integrity. Data from different hydrocarbon-producing regions within Colorado and New Mexico revealed a wider range (0.3 to 26.5%) of SCP and/or CVF occurrence than previously reported, highlighting the need to better understand regional trends in well integrity. Directional wells were more likely to exhibit SCP and/or CVF than vertical wells in Colorado and Pennsylvania, and their installation corresponded with statewide increases in SCP and/or CVF occurrence in Colorado (2005 to 2009) and Pennsylvania (2007 to 2011). Testing the ground around wells for indicators of gas leakage is not a widespread practice in the states considered. However, 3.0% of Colorado wells tested and 0.1% of New Mexico wells tested exhibited a degree of SCP sufficient to potentially induce leakage outside the well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8040654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80406542021-04-20 Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity Lackey, Greg Rajaram, Harihar Bolander, James Sherwood, Owen A. Ryan, Joseph N. Shih, Chung Yan Bromhal, Grant S. Dilmore, Robert M. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences Oil and gas wells with compromised integrity are a concern because they can potentially leak hydrocarbons or other fluids into groundwater and/or the atmosphere. Most states in the United States require some form of integrity testing, but few jurisdictions mandate widespread testing and open reporting on a scale informative for leakage risk assessment. In this study, we searched 33 US state oil and gas regulatory agency databases and identified records useful for evaluating well integrity in Colorado, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania. In total, we compiled 474,621 testing records from 105,031 wells across these states into a uniform dataset. We found that 14.1% of wells tested prior to 2018 in Pennsylvania exhibited sustained casing pressure (SCP) or casing vent flow (CVF)—two indicators of compromised well integrity. Data from different hydrocarbon-producing regions within Colorado and New Mexico revealed a wider range (0.3 to 26.5%) of SCP and/or CVF occurrence than previously reported, highlighting the need to better understand regional trends in well integrity. Directional wells were more likely to exhibit SCP and/or CVF than vertical wells in Colorado and Pennsylvania, and their installation corresponded with statewide increases in SCP and/or CVF occurrence in Colorado (2005 to 2009) and Pennsylvania (2007 to 2011). Testing the ground around wells for indicators of gas leakage is not a widespread practice in the states considered. However, 3.0% of Colorado wells tested and 0.1% of New Mexico wells tested exhibited a degree of SCP sufficient to potentially induce leakage outside the well. National Academy of Sciences 2021-04-06 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8040654/ /pubmed/33753556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013894118 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Physical Sciences
Lackey, Greg
Rajaram, Harihar
Bolander, James
Sherwood, Owen A.
Ryan, Joseph N.
Shih, Chung Yan
Bromhal, Grant S.
Dilmore, Robert M.
Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity
title Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity
title_full Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity
title_fullStr Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity
title_full_unstemmed Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity
title_short Public data from three US states provide new insights into well integrity
title_sort public data from three us states provide new insights into well integrity
topic Physical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33753556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013894118
work_keys_str_mv AT lackeygreg publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity
AT rajaramharihar publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity
AT bolanderjames publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity
AT sherwoodowena publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity
AT ryanjosephn publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity
AT shihchungyan publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity
AT bromhalgrants publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity
AT dilmorerobertm publicdatafromthreeusstatesprovidenewinsightsintowellintegrity