Cargando…

Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals

OBJECTIVE: to analyze, in the clinical practice of large hospitals, how the adoption of measures to prevent and control the spread of bacterial resistance has occurred, and to propose a score for the institutions’ adherence. METHOD: a cross-sectional study carried out in 30 large hospitals of Minas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Mello, Mariana Sanches, Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3952.3407
_version_ 1783677844215300096
author de Mello, Mariana Sanches
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
author_facet de Mello, Mariana Sanches
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
author_sort de Mello, Mariana Sanches
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to analyze, in the clinical practice of large hospitals, how the adoption of measures to prevent and control the spread of bacterial resistance has occurred, and to propose a score for the institutions’ adherence. METHOD: a cross-sectional study carried out in 30 large hospitals of Minas Gerais, from February 2018 to April 2019, after approval by the Ethics and Research Committee. Interviews were conducted with hospital managers, with Hospital Infection Control Services coordinators, and with the care coordinators of the Inpatient Units and Intensive Care Center. In addition, observations were made of the adoption of preventive measures by the multidisciplinary team in the care units. RESULTS: in the 30 participating hospitals, 93.3% (N=28) had protocols for prophylactic antibiotics, and 86.7% (N=26) performed their audit, 86.7% (N=26) for therapeutic antibiotics and 83.3% (N=25) their audit; 93.3% (N=56) used gloves and cloaks for patients in contact precautions, and 78.3% (N=47) of the professionals were unaware of or answered incompletely on the five moments for hand hygiene. In the score to identify the adoption of measures to control bacterial resistance, 83.3% (N=25) of the hospitals were classified as partially compliant, 13.3% (N=04) as deficient, and 3.4% (N=01) as non-adoption. CONCLUSION: it was found that the recommended measures to contain bacterial resistance are not consolidated in the clinical practice of the hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8040782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80407822021-04-21 Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals de Mello, Mariana Sanches Oliveira, Adriana Cristina Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to analyze, in the clinical practice of large hospitals, how the adoption of measures to prevent and control the spread of bacterial resistance has occurred, and to propose a score for the institutions’ adherence. METHOD: a cross-sectional study carried out in 30 large hospitals of Minas Gerais, from February 2018 to April 2019, after approval by the Ethics and Research Committee. Interviews were conducted with hospital managers, with Hospital Infection Control Services coordinators, and with the care coordinators of the Inpatient Units and Intensive Care Center. In addition, observations were made of the adoption of preventive measures by the multidisciplinary team in the care units. RESULTS: in the 30 participating hospitals, 93.3% (N=28) had protocols for prophylactic antibiotics, and 86.7% (N=26) performed their audit, 86.7% (N=26) for therapeutic antibiotics and 83.3% (N=25) their audit; 93.3% (N=56) used gloves and cloaks for patients in contact precautions, and 78.3% (N=47) of the professionals were unaware of or answered incompletely on the five moments for hand hygiene. In the score to identify the adoption of measures to control bacterial resistance, 83.3% (N=25) of the hospitals were classified as partially compliant, 13.3% (N=04) as deficient, and 3.4% (N=01) as non-adoption. CONCLUSION: it was found that the recommended measures to contain bacterial resistance are not consolidated in the clinical practice of the hospitals. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8040782/ /pubmed/33852679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3952.3407 Text en Copyright © 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Mello, Mariana Sanches
Oliveira, Adriana Cristina
Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals
title Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals
title_full Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals
title_fullStr Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals
title_short Overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals
title_sort overview of the actions to combat bacterial resistance in large hospitals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33852679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3952.3407
work_keys_str_mv AT demellomarianasanches overviewoftheactionstocombatbacterialresistanceinlargehospitals
AT oliveiraadrianacristina overviewoftheactionstocombatbacterialresistanceinlargehospitals