Cargando…

Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study

Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of lower-dose decitabine in patients with lower-risk MDS, a prospective multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare decitabine with the best supportive care (BSC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from September 2013 to August 2018 w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Li, Mei, Chen, Ren, Yanling, Zhou, Xinping, Ma, Liya, Xu, Weilai, Wei, Juying, Jiang, Huifang, Zhang, Liming, Zeng, Hui, Tong, Hongyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33854598
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.56207
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of lower-dose decitabine in patients with lower-risk MDS, a prospective multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare decitabine with the best supportive care (BSC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from September 2013 to August 2018 were assigned to the decitabine group or the BSC group. Decitabine (12 mg/m(2)/day) was administered over 1 hour/day for 5 consecutive days in a 4-week cycle. BSC, including growth factors, transfusion, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and immunosuppressive agents were given consecutively. The endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved overall response (OR) in the first 2 or 3 courses, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of recruited 82 patients were analyzed. In the decitabine group, 65.9% (27/41) achieved OR after 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, compared with 22.0% (9/41) in the BSC group (p <0.01). Besides, 44.0% (11/25) in the decitabine group became independent of RBC/Platelets transfusion, compared with 27.8% (5/18) in the BSC group. Patients with gene mutation and treated with decitabine achieved a higher OR rate, compared with those without gene mutation [72.0% (18/25) vs 11.5% (3/26), p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in the median EFS between the decitabine and BSC groups (20.6 vs 14.3 months respectively, p = 0.665). In the decitabine group, the most significant adverse events were infections of any grades or neutropenic fever (46.3%, 19/41) and one patient (4.2%) died of acute cerebral infarction within 6 weeks of treatment. Conclusion: Lower-dose decitabine demonstrated promising clinical response with acceptable toxicity profiles in patients with low- and intermediate 1-risk MDS. A higher response rate to decitabine was observed in patients with mutated genes. Therefore, lower-dose decitabine can be advocated for patients with low-risk MDS and mutated genes.