Cargando…
Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study
Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of lower-dose decitabine in patients with lower-risk MDS, a prospective multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare decitabine with the best supportive care (BSC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from September 2013 to August 2018 w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33854598 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.56207 |
_version_ | 1783677857092861952 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Li Mei, Chen Ren, Yanling Zhou, Xinping Ma, Liya Xu, Weilai Wei, Juying Jiang, Huifang Zhang, Liming Zeng, Hui Tong, Hongyan |
author_facet | Ye, Li Mei, Chen Ren, Yanling Zhou, Xinping Ma, Liya Xu, Weilai Wei, Juying Jiang, Huifang Zhang, Liming Zeng, Hui Tong, Hongyan |
author_sort | Ye, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of lower-dose decitabine in patients with lower-risk MDS, a prospective multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare decitabine with the best supportive care (BSC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from September 2013 to August 2018 were assigned to the decitabine group or the BSC group. Decitabine (12 mg/m(2)/day) was administered over 1 hour/day for 5 consecutive days in a 4-week cycle. BSC, including growth factors, transfusion, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and immunosuppressive agents were given consecutively. The endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved overall response (OR) in the first 2 or 3 courses, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of recruited 82 patients were analyzed. In the decitabine group, 65.9% (27/41) achieved OR after 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, compared with 22.0% (9/41) in the BSC group (p <0.01). Besides, 44.0% (11/25) in the decitabine group became independent of RBC/Platelets transfusion, compared with 27.8% (5/18) in the BSC group. Patients with gene mutation and treated with decitabine achieved a higher OR rate, compared with those without gene mutation [72.0% (18/25) vs 11.5% (3/26), p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in the median EFS between the decitabine and BSC groups (20.6 vs 14.3 months respectively, p = 0.665). In the decitabine group, the most significant adverse events were infections of any grades or neutropenic fever (46.3%, 19/41) and one patient (4.2%) died of acute cerebral infarction within 6 weeks of treatment. Conclusion: Lower-dose decitabine demonstrated promising clinical response with acceptable toxicity profiles in patients with low- and intermediate 1-risk MDS. A higher response rate to decitabine was observed in patients with mutated genes. Therefore, lower-dose decitabine can be advocated for patients with low-risk MDS and mutated genes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8040893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80408932021-04-13 Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study Ye, Li Mei, Chen Ren, Yanling Zhou, Xinping Ma, Liya Xu, Weilai Wei, Juying Jiang, Huifang Zhang, Liming Zeng, Hui Tong, Hongyan J Cancer Research Paper Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of lower-dose decitabine in patients with lower-risk MDS, a prospective multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare decitabine with the best supportive care (BSC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from September 2013 to August 2018 were assigned to the decitabine group or the BSC group. Decitabine (12 mg/m(2)/day) was administered over 1 hour/day for 5 consecutive days in a 4-week cycle. BSC, including growth factors, transfusion, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and immunosuppressive agents were given consecutively. The endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved overall response (OR) in the first 2 or 3 courses, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of recruited 82 patients were analyzed. In the decitabine group, 65.9% (27/41) achieved OR after 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, compared with 22.0% (9/41) in the BSC group (p <0.01). Besides, 44.0% (11/25) in the decitabine group became independent of RBC/Platelets transfusion, compared with 27.8% (5/18) in the BSC group. Patients with gene mutation and treated with decitabine achieved a higher OR rate, compared with those without gene mutation [72.0% (18/25) vs 11.5% (3/26), p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in the median EFS between the decitabine and BSC groups (20.6 vs 14.3 months respectively, p = 0.665). In the decitabine group, the most significant adverse events were infections of any grades or neutropenic fever (46.3%, 19/41) and one patient (4.2%) died of acute cerebral infarction within 6 weeks of treatment. Conclusion: Lower-dose decitabine demonstrated promising clinical response with acceptable toxicity profiles in patients with low- and intermediate 1-risk MDS. A higher response rate to decitabine was observed in patients with mutated genes. Therefore, lower-dose decitabine can be advocated for patients with low-risk MDS and mutated genes. Ivyspring International Publisher 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8040893/ /pubmed/33854598 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.56207 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Ye, Li Mei, Chen Ren, Yanling Zhou, Xinping Ma, Liya Xu, Weilai Wei, Juying Jiang, Huifang Zhang, Liming Zeng, Hui Tong, Hongyan Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study |
title | Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study |
title_full | Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study |
title_fullStr | Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study |
title_short | Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study |
title_sort | lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk mds patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33854598 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.56207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeli lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT meichen lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT renyanling lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT zhouxinping lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT maliya lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT xuweilai lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT weijuying lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT jianghuifang lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT zhangliming lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT zenghui lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study AT tonghongyan lowerdosedecitabineimprovesclinicalresponsecomparedwithbestsupportivecareinlowerriskmdspatientsaprospectivemulticenterphase2study |