Cargando…
The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed
[Image: see text] Protein complex formation depends strongly on electrostatic interactions. The distribution of charges on the surface of redox proteins is often optimized by evolution to guide recognition and binding. To test the degree to which the electrostatic interactions between cytochrome c p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33646750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00021 |
_version_ | 1783677904511565824 |
---|---|
author | Di Savino, Antonella Foerster, Johannes M. Ullmann, G. Matthias Ubbink, Marcellus |
author_facet | Di Savino, Antonella Foerster, Johannes M. Ullmann, G. Matthias Ubbink, Marcellus |
author_sort | Di Savino, Antonella |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Protein complex formation depends strongly on electrostatic interactions. The distribution of charges on the surface of redox proteins is often optimized by evolution to guide recognition and binding. To test the degree to which the electrostatic interactions between cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) and cytochrome c (Cc) are optimized, we produced five CcP variants, each with a different charge distribution on the surface. Monte Carlo simulations show that the addition of negative charges attracts Cc to the new patches, and the neutralization of the charges in the regular, stereospecific binding site for Cc abolishes the electrostatic interactions in that region entirely. For CcP variants with the charges in the regular binding site intact, additional negative patches slightly enhance productive complex formation, despite disrupting the optimized charge distribution. Removal of the charges in the regular binding site results in a dramatic decrease in the complex formation rate, even in the presence of highly negative patches elsewhere on the surface. We conclude that additional charge patches can result in either productive or futile encounter complexes, depending on whether negative residues are located also in the regular binding site. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8041253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80412532021-04-13 The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed Di Savino, Antonella Foerster, Johannes M. Ullmann, G. Matthias Ubbink, Marcellus Biochemistry [Image: see text] Protein complex formation depends strongly on electrostatic interactions. The distribution of charges on the surface of redox proteins is often optimized by evolution to guide recognition and binding. To test the degree to which the electrostatic interactions between cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) and cytochrome c (Cc) are optimized, we produced five CcP variants, each with a different charge distribution on the surface. Monte Carlo simulations show that the addition of negative charges attracts Cc to the new patches, and the neutralization of the charges in the regular, stereospecific binding site for Cc abolishes the electrostatic interactions in that region entirely. For CcP variants with the charges in the regular binding site intact, additional negative patches slightly enhance productive complex formation, despite disrupting the optimized charge distribution. Removal of the charges in the regular binding site results in a dramatic decrease in the complex formation rate, even in the presence of highly negative patches elsewhere on the surface. We conclude that additional charge patches can result in either productive or futile encounter complexes, depending on whether negative residues are located also in the regular binding site. American Chemical Society 2021-03-01 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8041253/ /pubmed/33646750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00021 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Di Savino, Antonella Foerster, Johannes M. Ullmann, G. Matthias Ubbink, Marcellus The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed |
title | The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines
Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed |
title_full | The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines
Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed |
title_fullStr | The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines
Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed |
title_full_unstemmed | The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines
Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed |
title_short | The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines
Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed |
title_sort | charge distribution on a protein surface determines
whether productive or futile encounter complexes are formed |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33646750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT disavinoantonella thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed AT foersterjohannesm thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed AT ullmanngmatthias thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed AT ubbinkmarcellus thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed AT disavinoantonella chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed AT foersterjohannesm chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed AT ullmanngmatthias chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed AT ubbinkmarcellus chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed |