Cargando…

The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed

[Image: see text] Protein complex formation depends strongly on electrostatic interactions. The distribution of charges on the surface of redox proteins is often optimized by evolution to guide recognition and binding. To test the degree to which the electrostatic interactions between cytochrome c p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Savino, Antonella, Foerster, Johannes M., Ullmann, G. Matthias, Ubbink, Marcellus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33646750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00021
_version_ 1783677904511565824
author Di Savino, Antonella
Foerster, Johannes M.
Ullmann, G. Matthias
Ubbink, Marcellus
author_facet Di Savino, Antonella
Foerster, Johannes M.
Ullmann, G. Matthias
Ubbink, Marcellus
author_sort Di Savino, Antonella
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Protein complex formation depends strongly on electrostatic interactions. The distribution of charges on the surface of redox proteins is often optimized by evolution to guide recognition and binding. To test the degree to which the electrostatic interactions between cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) and cytochrome c (Cc) are optimized, we produced five CcP variants, each with a different charge distribution on the surface. Monte Carlo simulations show that the addition of negative charges attracts Cc to the new patches, and the neutralization of the charges in the regular, stereospecific binding site for Cc abolishes the electrostatic interactions in that region entirely. For CcP variants with the charges in the regular binding site intact, additional negative patches slightly enhance productive complex formation, despite disrupting the optimized charge distribution. Removal of the charges in the regular binding site results in a dramatic decrease in the complex formation rate, even in the presence of highly negative patches elsewhere on the surface. We conclude that additional charge patches can result in either productive or futile encounter complexes, depending on whether negative residues are located also in the regular binding site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8041253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80412532021-04-13 The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed Di Savino, Antonella Foerster, Johannes M. Ullmann, G. Matthias Ubbink, Marcellus Biochemistry [Image: see text] Protein complex formation depends strongly on electrostatic interactions. The distribution of charges on the surface of redox proteins is often optimized by evolution to guide recognition and binding. To test the degree to which the electrostatic interactions between cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) and cytochrome c (Cc) are optimized, we produced five CcP variants, each with a different charge distribution on the surface. Monte Carlo simulations show that the addition of negative charges attracts Cc to the new patches, and the neutralization of the charges in the regular, stereospecific binding site for Cc abolishes the electrostatic interactions in that region entirely. For CcP variants with the charges in the regular binding site intact, additional negative patches slightly enhance productive complex formation, despite disrupting the optimized charge distribution. Removal of the charges in the regular binding site results in a dramatic decrease in the complex formation rate, even in the presence of highly negative patches elsewhere on the surface. We conclude that additional charge patches can result in either productive or futile encounter complexes, depending on whether negative residues are located also in the regular binding site. American Chemical Society 2021-03-01 2021-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8041253/ /pubmed/33646750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00021 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Di Savino, Antonella
Foerster, Johannes M.
Ullmann, G. Matthias
Ubbink, Marcellus
The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed
title The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed
title_full The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed
title_fullStr The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed
title_full_unstemmed The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed
title_short The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed
title_sort charge distribution on a protein surface determines whether productive or futile encounter complexes are formed
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33646750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00021
work_keys_str_mv AT disavinoantonella thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed
AT foersterjohannesm thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed
AT ullmanngmatthias thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed
AT ubbinkmarcellus thechargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed
AT disavinoantonella chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed
AT foersterjohannesm chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed
AT ullmanngmatthias chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed
AT ubbinkmarcellus chargedistributiononaproteinsurfacedetermineswhetherproductiveorfutileencountercomplexesareformed