Cargando…

Extracorporeal multiorgan support including CO(2)-removal with the ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system for COVID-19: A case report

A substantial part of COVID-19-patients suffers from multi-organ failure (MOF). We report on an 80-year old patient with pulmonary, renal, circulatory, and hepatic failure. We decided against the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to old age and a SOFA-score of 13. However, the pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huber, Wolfgang, Lorenz, Georg, Heilmaier, Markus, Böttcher, Katrin, Sahm, Philipp, Middelhoff, Moritz, Ritzer, Barbara, Schulz, Dominik, Bekka, Elias, Hesse, Felix, Poszler, Alexander, Geisler, Fabian, Spinner, Christoph, Schmid, Roland M, Lahmer, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32985328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0391398820961781
Descripción
Sumario:A substantial part of COVID-19-patients suffers from multi-organ failure (MOF). We report on an 80-year old patient with pulmonary, renal, circulatory, and hepatic failure. We decided against the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to old age and a SOFA-score of 13. However, the patient was continuously treated with the extracorporeal multi-organ- “ADVanced Organ Support” (ADVOS) device (ADVITOS GmbH, Munich, Germany). During eight 24h-treatment-sessions blood flow (100–300 mL/min), dialysate flow (160–320 mL/min) and dialysate pH (7.6–9.0) were adapted to optimize arterial PaCO(2) and pH. Effective CO(2) removal and correction of acidosis could be demonstrated by mean arterial- versus post-dialyzer values of pCO(2) (68.7 ± 13.8 vs. 26.9 ± 11.6 mmHg; p < 0.001). The CO(2)-elimination rate was 48 ± 23mL/min. The initial vasopressor requirement could be reduced in parallel to pH-normalization. Interruptions of ADVOS-treatment repeatedly resulted in reversible deteriorations of p(a)CO(2) and pH. After 95 h of continuous extracorporeal decarboxylating therapy the patient had markedly improved circulatory parameters compared to baseline. In the context of secondary pulmonary infection and progressive liver failure, the patient had a sudden cardiac arrest. In accordance with the presumed patient will, we decided against mechanical resuscitation. Irrespective of the outcome we conclude that extracorporeal CO(2) removal and multiorgan-support were feasible in this COVID-19-patient. Combined and less invasive approaches such as ADVOS might be considered in old-age-COVID-19 patients with MOF.