Cargando…
Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion
For detecting differential item functioning (DIF) between two or more groups of test takers in the Rasch model, their item parameters need to be placed on the same scale. Typically this is done by means of choosing a set of so-called anchor items based on statistical tests or heuristics. Here the au...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621621990743 |
_version_ | 1783677935414149120 |
---|---|
author | Strobl, Carolin Kopf, Julia Kohler, Lucas von Oertzen, Timo Zeileis, Achim |
author_facet | Strobl, Carolin Kopf, Julia Kohler, Lucas von Oertzen, Timo Zeileis, Achim |
author_sort | Strobl, Carolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | For detecting differential item functioning (DIF) between two or more groups of test takers in the Rasch model, their item parameters need to be placed on the same scale. Typically this is done by means of choosing a set of so-called anchor items based on statistical tests or heuristics. Here the authors suggest an alternative strategy: By means of an inequality criterion from economics, the Gini Index, the item parameters are shifted to an optimal position where the item parameter estimates of the groups best overlap. Several toy examples, extensive simulation studies, and two empirical application examples are presented to illustrate the properties of the Gini Index as an anchor point selection criterion and compare its properties to those of the criterion used in the alignment approach of Asparouhov and Muthén. In particular, the authors show that—in addition to the globally optimal position for the anchor point—the criterion plot contains valuable additional information and may help discover unaccounted DIF-inducing multidimensionality. They further provide mathematical results that enable an efficient sparse grid optimization and make it feasible to extend the approach, for example, to multiple group scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8041453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80414532021-04-22 Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion Strobl, Carolin Kopf, Julia Kohler, Lucas von Oertzen, Timo Zeileis, Achim Appl Psychol Meas Articles For detecting differential item functioning (DIF) between two or more groups of test takers in the Rasch model, their item parameters need to be placed on the same scale. Typically this is done by means of choosing a set of so-called anchor items based on statistical tests or heuristics. Here the authors suggest an alternative strategy: By means of an inequality criterion from economics, the Gini Index, the item parameters are shifted to an optimal position where the item parameter estimates of the groups best overlap. Several toy examples, extensive simulation studies, and two empirical application examples are presented to illustrate the properties of the Gini Index as an anchor point selection criterion and compare its properties to those of the criterion used in the alignment approach of Asparouhov and Muthén. In particular, the authors show that—in addition to the globally optimal position for the anchor point—the criterion plot contains valuable additional information and may help discover unaccounted DIF-inducing multidimensionality. They further provide mathematical results that enable an efficient sparse grid optimization and make it feasible to extend the approach, for example, to multiple group scenarios. SAGE Publications 2021-02-25 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8041453/ /pubmed/33897070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621621990743 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Strobl, Carolin Kopf, Julia Kohler, Lucas von Oertzen, Timo Zeileis, Achim Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion |
title | Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion |
title_full | Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion |
title_fullStr | Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion |
title_full_unstemmed | Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion |
title_short | Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion |
title_sort | anchor point selection: scale alignment based on an inequality criterion |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621621990743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stroblcarolin anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion AT kopfjulia anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion AT kohlerlucas anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion AT vonoertzentimo anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion AT zeileisachim anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion |