Cargando…

Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion

For detecting differential item functioning (DIF) between two or more groups of test takers in the Rasch model, their item parameters need to be placed on the same scale. Typically this is done by means of choosing a set of so-called anchor items based on statistical tests or heuristics. Here the au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strobl, Carolin, Kopf, Julia, Kohler, Lucas, von Oertzen, Timo, Zeileis, Achim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621621990743
_version_ 1783677935414149120
author Strobl, Carolin
Kopf, Julia
Kohler, Lucas
von Oertzen, Timo
Zeileis, Achim
author_facet Strobl, Carolin
Kopf, Julia
Kohler, Lucas
von Oertzen, Timo
Zeileis, Achim
author_sort Strobl, Carolin
collection PubMed
description For detecting differential item functioning (DIF) between two or more groups of test takers in the Rasch model, their item parameters need to be placed on the same scale. Typically this is done by means of choosing a set of so-called anchor items based on statistical tests or heuristics. Here the authors suggest an alternative strategy: By means of an inequality criterion from economics, the Gini Index, the item parameters are shifted to an optimal position where the item parameter estimates of the groups best overlap. Several toy examples, extensive simulation studies, and two empirical application examples are presented to illustrate the properties of the Gini Index as an anchor point selection criterion and compare its properties to those of the criterion used in the alignment approach of Asparouhov and Muthén. In particular, the authors show that—in addition to the globally optimal position for the anchor point—the criterion plot contains valuable additional information and may help discover unaccounted DIF-inducing multidimensionality. They further provide mathematical results that enable an efficient sparse grid optimization and make it feasible to extend the approach, for example, to multiple group scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8041453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80414532021-04-22 Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion Strobl, Carolin Kopf, Julia Kohler, Lucas von Oertzen, Timo Zeileis, Achim Appl Psychol Meas Articles For detecting differential item functioning (DIF) between two or more groups of test takers in the Rasch model, their item parameters need to be placed on the same scale. Typically this is done by means of choosing a set of so-called anchor items based on statistical tests or heuristics. Here the authors suggest an alternative strategy: By means of an inequality criterion from economics, the Gini Index, the item parameters are shifted to an optimal position where the item parameter estimates of the groups best overlap. Several toy examples, extensive simulation studies, and two empirical application examples are presented to illustrate the properties of the Gini Index as an anchor point selection criterion and compare its properties to those of the criterion used in the alignment approach of Asparouhov and Muthén. In particular, the authors show that—in addition to the globally optimal position for the anchor point—the criterion plot contains valuable additional information and may help discover unaccounted DIF-inducing multidimensionality. They further provide mathematical results that enable an efficient sparse grid optimization and make it feasible to extend the approach, for example, to multiple group scenarios. SAGE Publications 2021-02-25 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8041453/ /pubmed/33897070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621621990743 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Strobl, Carolin
Kopf, Julia
Kohler, Lucas
von Oertzen, Timo
Zeileis, Achim
Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion
title Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion
title_full Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion
title_fullStr Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion
title_full_unstemmed Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion
title_short Anchor Point Selection: Scale Alignment Based on an Inequality Criterion
title_sort anchor point selection: scale alignment based on an inequality criterion
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33897070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621621990743
work_keys_str_mv AT stroblcarolin anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion
AT kopfjulia anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion
AT kohlerlucas anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion
AT vonoertzentimo anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion
AT zeileisachim anchorpointselectionscalealignmentbasedonaninequalitycriterion