Cargando…

Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics

BACKGROUND: Urine reagent strip test (URST) results are semi-quantitative; therefore, the precision of URSTs is evaluated as the proportion of categorical results from repeated measurements of a sample that are concordant with an expected result. However, URSTs have quantitative readout values befor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Haeil, Ko, Younsuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33824232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2021.41.5.447
_version_ 1783677964709265408
author Park, Haeil
Ko, Younsuk
author_facet Park, Haeil
Ko, Younsuk
author_sort Park, Haeil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urine reagent strip test (URST) results are semi-quantitative; therefore, the precision of URSTs is evaluated as the proportion of categorical results from repeated measurements of a sample that are concordant with an expected result. However, URSTs have quantitative readout values before ordinal results challenging statistical monitoring for internal quality control (IQC) with control rules. This study aimed to determine the sigma metric of URSTs and derive appropriate control rules for IQC. METHODS: The URiSCAN Super Plus fully automated urine analyzer (YD Diagnostics, Yongin, Korea) was used for URSTs. Change in reflectance rate (change %R) data from IQC for URSTs performed between November 2018 and May 2020 were analyzed. Red blood cells, bilirubin, urobilinogen, ketones, protein, glucose, leukocytes, and pH were measured from 2-3 levels of control materials. The total allowable error (TE(a)) for a grade was the difference in midpoints of a predefined change %R range between two adjacent grades. The sigma metric was calculated as TE(a)/SD. Sigma metric-based control rules were determined with Westgard EZ Rules 3 software (Westgard QC, Madison, WI, USA). RESULTS: Seven out of the eight analytes had a sigma metric >4 in the control materials with a negative grade (-), which were closer to the cut-offs. Corresponding control rules ranged from 1(2.5s) to 1(3.5s). CONCLUSIONS: Although the URST is a semi-quantitative test, statistical IQC can be performed using the readout values. According to the sigma metric, control rules recommended for URST IQC in routine clinical practice are 1(2.5s) to 1(3.5s).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8041599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80415992021-09-01 Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics Park, Haeil Ko, Younsuk Ann Lab Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Urine reagent strip test (URST) results are semi-quantitative; therefore, the precision of URSTs is evaluated as the proportion of categorical results from repeated measurements of a sample that are concordant with an expected result. However, URSTs have quantitative readout values before ordinal results challenging statistical monitoring for internal quality control (IQC) with control rules. This study aimed to determine the sigma metric of URSTs and derive appropriate control rules for IQC. METHODS: The URiSCAN Super Plus fully automated urine analyzer (YD Diagnostics, Yongin, Korea) was used for URSTs. Change in reflectance rate (change %R) data from IQC for URSTs performed between November 2018 and May 2020 were analyzed. Red blood cells, bilirubin, urobilinogen, ketones, protein, glucose, leukocytes, and pH were measured from 2-3 levels of control materials. The total allowable error (TE(a)) for a grade was the difference in midpoints of a predefined change %R range between two adjacent grades. The sigma metric was calculated as TE(a)/SD. Sigma metric-based control rules were determined with Westgard EZ Rules 3 software (Westgard QC, Madison, WI, USA). RESULTS: Seven out of the eight analytes had a sigma metric >4 in the control materials with a negative grade (-), which were closer to the cut-offs. Corresponding control rules ranged from 1(2.5s) to 1(3.5s). CONCLUSIONS: Although the URST is a semi-quantitative test, statistical IQC can be performed using the readout values. According to the sigma metric, control rules recommended for URST IQC in routine clinical practice are 1(2.5s) to 1(3.5s). Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2021-09-01 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8041599/ /pubmed/33824232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2021.41.5.447 Text en © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Haeil
Ko, Younsuk
Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics
title Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics
title_full Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics
title_fullStr Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics
title_full_unstemmed Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics
title_short Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics
title_sort internal quality control data of urine reagent strip tests and derivation of control rules based on sigma metrics
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33824232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2021.41.5.447
work_keys_str_mv AT parkhaeil internalqualitycontroldataofurinereagentstriptestsandderivationofcontrolrulesbasedonsigmametrics
AT koyounsuk internalqualitycontroldataofurinereagentstriptestsandderivationofcontrolrulesbasedonsigmametrics