Cargando…
Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has superior sensitivity over conventional imaging (CI) to stage prostate cancer (PCa) and therefore is increasingly used in staging to stratify patients before radical therapy. Whether this improv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05058-5 |
_version_ | 1783677984571392000 |
---|---|
author | Ferraro, Daniela A. Lehner, Fabienne Becker, Anton S. Kranzbühler, Benedikt Kudura, Ken Mebert, Iliana Messerli, Michael Hermanns, Thomas Eberli, Daniel Burger, Irene A. |
author_facet | Ferraro, Daniela A. Lehner, Fabienne Becker, Anton S. Kranzbühler, Benedikt Kudura, Ken Mebert, Iliana Messerli, Michael Hermanns, Thomas Eberli, Daniel Burger, Irene A. |
author_sort | Ferraro, Daniela A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has superior sensitivity over conventional imaging (CI) to stage prostate cancer (PCa) and therefore is increasingly used in staging to stratify patients before radical therapy. Whether this improved diagnostic accuracy translates into improved outcome after radical prostatectomy (RPE) has not yet been shown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcome after RPE between patients that underwent preoperative staging with CI or PSMA-PET for intermediate and high-risk PCa. METHODS: We retrospectively selected all patients that underwent RPE for intermediate- or high-risk PCa at our institution before PSMA-PET introduction (between March 2014 and September 2016) and compared the oncologic outcome of patients staged with PSMA-PET (between October 2016 and October 2018). Oncological pre-surgical risk parameters (age, PSA, D’Amico score, biopsy-ISUP, and cT stage) were compared between the groups. Oncological outcome was determined as PSA persistence, nerve-sparing rate, and surgical margin status. Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher’s, and chi-square tests where used for statistical testing. RESULTS: One hundred five patients were included, 53 in the CI group and 52 in the PSMA-group. Patients in the PSMA group had higher ISUP grade (p < 0.001) and D’Amico score (p < 0.05). The rate of free surgical margins and PSA persistence after RPE was 64% and 17% for the CI and 77% and 6% for the PSMA group (p = 0.15 and 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis with high-risk patients revealed PSA persistence in 7% (3/44) in the PSMA group and 25% (7/28) in the CI group (p = 0.04). Limitations include the retrospective design and choline-PET for some patients in the CI group. CONCLUSION: Immediate outcome after RPE was not worse in the PSMA group compared with the CI group, despite a higher-risk cohort. In a comparison of only high-risk patients, PSMA-PET staging was associated with a significantly lower rate of postsurgical PSA persistence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8041683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80416832021-04-27 Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison Ferraro, Daniela A. Lehner, Fabienne Becker, Anton S. Kranzbühler, Benedikt Kudura, Ken Mebert, Iliana Messerli, Michael Hermanns, Thomas Eberli, Daniel Burger, Irene A. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has superior sensitivity over conventional imaging (CI) to stage prostate cancer (PCa) and therefore is increasingly used in staging to stratify patients before radical therapy. Whether this improved diagnostic accuracy translates into improved outcome after radical prostatectomy (RPE) has not yet been shown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcome after RPE between patients that underwent preoperative staging with CI or PSMA-PET for intermediate and high-risk PCa. METHODS: We retrospectively selected all patients that underwent RPE for intermediate- or high-risk PCa at our institution before PSMA-PET introduction (between March 2014 and September 2016) and compared the oncologic outcome of patients staged with PSMA-PET (between October 2016 and October 2018). Oncological pre-surgical risk parameters (age, PSA, D’Amico score, biopsy-ISUP, and cT stage) were compared between the groups. Oncological outcome was determined as PSA persistence, nerve-sparing rate, and surgical margin status. Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher’s, and chi-square tests where used for statistical testing. RESULTS: One hundred five patients were included, 53 in the CI group and 52 in the PSMA-group. Patients in the PSMA group had higher ISUP grade (p < 0.001) and D’Amico score (p < 0.05). The rate of free surgical margins and PSA persistence after RPE was 64% and 17% for the CI and 77% and 6% for the PSMA group (p = 0.15 and 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis with high-risk patients revealed PSA persistence in 7% (3/44) in the PSMA group and 25% (7/28) in the CI group (p = 0.04). Limitations include the retrospective design and choline-PET for some patients in the CI group. CONCLUSION: Immediate outcome after RPE was not worse in the PSMA group compared with the CI group, despite a higher-risk cohort. In a comparison of only high-risk patients, PSMA-PET staging was associated with a significantly lower rate of postsurgical PSA persistence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8041683/ /pubmed/33074376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05058-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ferraro, Daniela A. Lehner, Fabienne Becker, Anton S. Kranzbühler, Benedikt Kudura, Ken Mebert, Iliana Messerli, Michael Hermanns, Thomas Eberli, Daniel Burger, Irene A. Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison |
title | Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison |
title_full | Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison |
title_fullStr | Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison |
title_short | Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison |
title_sort | improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with (68)ga-psma-11 pet: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33074376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05058-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrarodanielaa improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT lehnerfabienne improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT beckerantons improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT kranzbuhlerbenedikt improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT kuduraken improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT mebertiliana improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT messerlimichael improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT hermannsthomas improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT eberlidaniel improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison AT burgerirenea improvedoncologicaloutcomeafterradicalprostatectomyinpatientsstagedwith68gapsma11petasinglecenterretrospectivecohortcomparison |