Cargando…
Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net
The quality of cephalometric analysis depends on the accuracy of the delineating landmarks in orthodontic and maxillofacial surgery. Due to the extensive number of landmarks, each analysis costs orthodontists considerable time per patient, leading to fatigue and inter- and intra-observer variabiliti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87261-4 |
_version_ | 1783678020686446592 |
---|---|
author | Kim, In-Hwan Kim, Young-Gon Kim, Sungchul Park, Jae-Woo Kim, Namkug |
author_facet | Kim, In-Hwan Kim, Young-Gon Kim, Sungchul Park, Jae-Woo Kim, Namkug |
author_sort | Kim, In-Hwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The quality of cephalometric analysis depends on the accuracy of the delineating landmarks in orthodontic and maxillofacial surgery. Due to the extensive number of landmarks, each analysis costs orthodontists considerable time per patient, leading to fatigue and inter- and intra-observer variabilities. Therefore, we proposed a fully automated cephalometry analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net (CNN). One thousand cephalometric x-ray images (2 k × 3 k) pixel were used. The dataset was split into training, validation, and test sets as 8:1:1. The 43 landmarks from each image were identified by an expert orthodontist. To evaluate intra-observer variabilities, 28 images from the dataset were randomly selected and measured again by the same orthodontist. To improve accuracy, a cascade CNN consisting of two steps was used for transfer learning. In the first step, the regions of interest (ROIs) were predicted by RetinaNet. In the second step, U-Net detected the precise landmarks in the ROIs. The average error of ROI detection alone was 1.55 ± 2.17 mm. The model with the cascade CNN showed an average error of 0.79 ± 0.91 mm (paired t-test, p = 0.0015). The orthodontist’s average error of reproducibility was 0.80 ± 0.79 mm. An accurate and fully automated cephalometric analysis was successfully developed and evaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8041841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80418412021-04-13 Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net Kim, In-Hwan Kim, Young-Gon Kim, Sungchul Park, Jae-Woo Kim, Namkug Sci Rep Article The quality of cephalometric analysis depends on the accuracy of the delineating landmarks in orthodontic and maxillofacial surgery. Due to the extensive number of landmarks, each analysis costs orthodontists considerable time per patient, leading to fatigue and inter- and intra-observer variabilities. Therefore, we proposed a fully automated cephalometry analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net (CNN). One thousand cephalometric x-ray images (2 k × 3 k) pixel were used. The dataset was split into training, validation, and test sets as 8:1:1. The 43 landmarks from each image were identified by an expert orthodontist. To evaluate intra-observer variabilities, 28 images from the dataset were randomly selected and measured again by the same orthodontist. To improve accuracy, a cascade CNN consisting of two steps was used for transfer learning. In the first step, the regions of interest (ROIs) were predicted by RetinaNet. In the second step, U-Net detected the precise landmarks in the ROIs. The average error of ROI detection alone was 1.55 ± 2.17 mm. The model with the cascade CNN showed an average error of 0.79 ± 0.91 mm (paired t-test, p = 0.0015). The orthodontist’s average error of reproducibility was 0.80 ± 0.79 mm. An accurate and fully automated cephalometric analysis was successfully developed and evaluated. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8041841/ /pubmed/33846506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87261-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, In-Hwan Kim, Young-Gon Kim, Sungchul Park, Jae-Woo Kim, Namkug Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net |
title | Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net |
title_full | Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net |
title_fullStr | Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net |
title_short | Comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net |
title_sort | comparing intra-observer variation and external variations of a fully automated cephalometric analysis with a cascade convolutional neural net |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33846506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87261-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiminhwan comparingintraobservervariationandexternalvariationsofafullyautomatedcephalometricanalysiswithacascadeconvolutionalneuralnet AT kimyounggon comparingintraobservervariationandexternalvariationsofafullyautomatedcephalometricanalysiswithacascadeconvolutionalneuralnet AT kimsungchul comparingintraobservervariationandexternalvariationsofafullyautomatedcephalometricanalysiswithacascadeconvolutionalneuralnet AT parkjaewoo comparingintraobservervariationandexternalvariationsofafullyautomatedcephalometricanalysiswithacascadeconvolutionalneuralnet AT kimnamkug comparingintraobservervariationandexternalvariationsofafullyautomatedcephalometricanalysiswithacascadeconvolutionalneuralnet |