Cargando…

From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan

To understand Lacan’s thinking process on vision, the entirety of his teaching must be taken into consideration. Until the 60s, the visual field is the imaginary, the constitutive principle of reality in its phenomenal giving to the experience of a subject. This register is the opposite of the field...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Licitra Rosa, Carmelo, Antonucci, Carla, Siracusano, Alberto, Centonze, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578277
_version_ 1783678079000903680
author Licitra Rosa, Carmelo
Antonucci, Carla
Siracusano, Alberto
Centonze, Diego
author_facet Licitra Rosa, Carmelo
Antonucci, Carla
Siracusano, Alberto
Centonze, Diego
author_sort Licitra Rosa, Carmelo
collection PubMed
description To understand Lacan’s thinking process on vision, the entirety of his teaching must be taken into consideration. Until the 60s, the visual field is the imaginary, the constitutive principle of reality in its phenomenal giving to the experience of a subject. This register is the opposite of the field of the word with the L schema and, subsequently, as subordinated to the symbolic system according to the model of the optical schema of the inverted flower vase of Bouasse. It is only with the 1964 seminar that Lacan makes a daring turnaround through which the visual becomes a sign of the emergence of a real that is irreducible to both reality and the mediation of the subject of knowledge. The split that separates reality and the real is reproduced in Lacan within the visual field, which is, on the one hand, the cardinal principle of the consistency of the experience of reality (as imaginary), and on the other, it is an element of irreducibility to reality (as object gaze). This produces a cascade of consequences: first of all, the modification of the presentation of the mirror stage. Unlike the voice, which through prosody, tone, and volume, finds some strips with which anchor itself imaginatively to reality, the gaze, invisible and elusive, escapes the imaginary grasp. Captured in myths, it reveals its power and ability to annihilate—as in the myth of Medusa’s gaze—or to make people fall in love but only with a narcissistic love that leads inexorably to death as in the myth of Narcissus. The gaze is elusive because the subject is dependent on it in the field of desire. Like the voice, it is about the desire on which the subject is supported; it is one of the objects on which the phantom depends. In our opinion, thanks to this characteristic, the gaze object can make remote psychoanalytic treatment possible through easily accessible videoconferencing tools and, at the same time, create new conditions within it that should be carefully evaluated to understand its implications in the session itself.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8042220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80422202021-04-14 From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan Licitra Rosa, Carmelo Antonucci, Carla Siracusano, Alberto Centonze, Diego Front Psychol Psychology To understand Lacan’s thinking process on vision, the entirety of his teaching must be taken into consideration. Until the 60s, the visual field is the imaginary, the constitutive principle of reality in its phenomenal giving to the experience of a subject. This register is the opposite of the field of the word with the L schema and, subsequently, as subordinated to the symbolic system according to the model of the optical schema of the inverted flower vase of Bouasse. It is only with the 1964 seminar that Lacan makes a daring turnaround through which the visual becomes a sign of the emergence of a real that is irreducible to both reality and the mediation of the subject of knowledge. The split that separates reality and the real is reproduced in Lacan within the visual field, which is, on the one hand, the cardinal principle of the consistency of the experience of reality (as imaginary), and on the other, it is an element of irreducibility to reality (as object gaze). This produces a cascade of consequences: first of all, the modification of the presentation of the mirror stage. Unlike the voice, which through prosody, tone, and volume, finds some strips with which anchor itself imaginatively to reality, the gaze, invisible and elusive, escapes the imaginary grasp. Captured in myths, it reveals its power and ability to annihilate—as in the myth of Medusa’s gaze—or to make people fall in love but only with a narcissistic love that leads inexorably to death as in the myth of Narcissus. The gaze is elusive because the subject is dependent on it in the field of desire. Like the voice, it is about the desire on which the subject is supported; it is one of the objects on which the phantom depends. In our opinion, thanks to this characteristic, the gaze object can make remote psychoanalytic treatment possible through easily accessible videoconferencing tools and, at the same time, create new conditions within it that should be carefully evaluated to understand its implications in the session itself. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8042220/ /pubmed/33859589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578277 Text en Copyright © 2021 Licitra Rosa, Antonucci, Siracusano and Centonze. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Licitra Rosa, Carmelo
Antonucci, Carla
Siracusano, Alberto
Centonze, Diego
From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan
title From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan
title_full From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan
title_fullStr From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan
title_full_unstemmed From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan
title_short From the Imaginary to Theory of the Gaze in Lacan
title_sort from the imaginary to theory of the gaze in lacan
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578277
work_keys_str_mv AT licitrarosacarmelo fromtheimaginarytotheoryofthegazeinlacan
AT antonuccicarla fromtheimaginarytotheoryofthegazeinlacan
AT siracusanoalberto fromtheimaginarytotheoryofthegazeinlacan
AT centonzediego fromtheimaginarytotheoryofthegazeinlacan