Cargando…
The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption
The current models of osteoclastic bone resorption focus on immobile osteoclasts sitting on the bone surface and drilling a pit into the bone matrix. It recently appeared that many osteoclasts also enlarge their pit by moving across the bone surface while resorbing. Drilling a pit thus represents on...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.644503 |
_version_ | 1783678081597177856 |
---|---|
author | Delaisse, Jean-Marie Søe, Kent Andersen, Thomas Levin Rojek, Aleksandra Maria Marcussen, Niels |
author_facet | Delaisse, Jean-Marie Søe, Kent Andersen, Thomas Levin Rojek, Aleksandra Maria Marcussen, Niels |
author_sort | Delaisse, Jean-Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current models of osteoclastic bone resorption focus on immobile osteoclasts sitting on the bone surface and drilling a pit into the bone matrix. It recently appeared that many osteoclasts also enlarge their pit by moving across the bone surface while resorbing. Drilling a pit thus represents only the start of a resorption event of much larger amplitude. This prolonged resorption activity significantly contributes to pathological bone destruction, but the mechanism whereby the osteoclast engages in this process does not have an answer within the standard bone resorption models. Herein, we review observations that lead to envision how prolonged resorption is possible through simultaneous resorption and migration. According to the standard pit model, the “sealing zone” which surrounds the ruffled border (i.e., the actual resorption apparatus), “anchors” the ruffled border against the bone surface to be resorbed. Herein, we highlight that continuation of resorption demands that the sealing zone “glides” inside the cavity. Thereby, the sealing zone emerges as the structure responsible for orienting and displacing the ruffled border, e.g., directing resorption against the cavity wall. Importantly, sealing zone displacement stringently requires thorough collagen removal from the cavity wall - which renders strong cathepsin K collagenolysis indispensable for engagement of osteoclasts in cavity-enlargement. Furthermore, the sealing zone is associated with generation of new ruffled border at the leading edge, thereby allowing the ruffled border to move ahead. The sealing zone and ruffled border displacements are coordinated with the migration of the cell body, shown to be under control of lamellipodia at the leading edge and of the release of resorption products at the rear. We propose that bone resorption demands more attention to osteoclastic models integrating resorption and migration activities into just one cell phenotype. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80422312021-04-14 The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption Delaisse, Jean-Marie Søe, Kent Andersen, Thomas Levin Rojek, Aleksandra Maria Marcussen, Niels Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology The current models of osteoclastic bone resorption focus on immobile osteoclasts sitting on the bone surface and drilling a pit into the bone matrix. It recently appeared that many osteoclasts also enlarge their pit by moving across the bone surface while resorbing. Drilling a pit thus represents only the start of a resorption event of much larger amplitude. This prolonged resorption activity significantly contributes to pathological bone destruction, but the mechanism whereby the osteoclast engages in this process does not have an answer within the standard bone resorption models. Herein, we review observations that lead to envision how prolonged resorption is possible through simultaneous resorption and migration. According to the standard pit model, the “sealing zone” which surrounds the ruffled border (i.e., the actual resorption apparatus), “anchors” the ruffled border against the bone surface to be resorbed. Herein, we highlight that continuation of resorption demands that the sealing zone “glides” inside the cavity. Thereby, the sealing zone emerges as the structure responsible for orienting and displacing the ruffled border, e.g., directing resorption against the cavity wall. Importantly, sealing zone displacement stringently requires thorough collagen removal from the cavity wall - which renders strong cathepsin K collagenolysis indispensable for engagement of osteoclasts in cavity-enlargement. Furthermore, the sealing zone is associated with generation of new ruffled border at the leading edge, thereby allowing the ruffled border to move ahead. The sealing zone and ruffled border displacements are coordinated with the migration of the cell body, shown to be under control of lamellipodia at the leading edge and of the release of resorption products at the rear. We propose that bone resorption demands more attention to osteoclastic models integrating resorption and migration activities into just one cell phenotype. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8042231/ /pubmed/33859985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.644503 Text en Copyright © 2021 Delaisse, Søe, Andersen, Rojek and Marcussen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cell and Developmental Biology Delaisse, Jean-Marie Søe, Kent Andersen, Thomas Levin Rojek, Aleksandra Maria Marcussen, Niels The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption |
title | The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption |
title_full | The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption |
title_fullStr | The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption |
title_full_unstemmed | The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption |
title_short | The Mechanism Switching the Osteoclast From Short to Long Duration Bone Resorption |
title_sort | mechanism switching the osteoclast from short to long duration bone resorption |
topic | Cell and Developmental Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.644503 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delaissejeanmarie themechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT søekent themechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT andersenthomaslevin themechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT rojekaleksandramaria themechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT marcussenniels themechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT delaissejeanmarie mechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT søekent mechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT andersenthomaslevin mechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT rojekaleksandramaria mechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption AT marcussenniels mechanismswitchingtheosteoclastfromshorttolongdurationboneresorption |