Cargando…
The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types
Neutrophils and T cells exist in close proximity in lymph nodes and inflamed tissues during health and disease. They are able to form stable interactions, with profound effects on the phenotype and function of the T cells. However, the outcome of these effects are frequently contradictory; in some s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633486 |
_version_ | 1783678114388246528 |
---|---|
author | Minns, Danielle Smith, Katie J. Hardisty, Gareth Rossi, Adriano G. Gwyer Findlay, Emily |
author_facet | Minns, Danielle Smith, Katie J. Hardisty, Gareth Rossi, Adriano G. Gwyer Findlay, Emily |
author_sort | Minns, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neutrophils and T cells exist in close proximity in lymph nodes and inflamed tissues during health and disease. They are able to form stable interactions, with profound effects on the phenotype and function of the T cells. However, the outcome of these effects are frequently contradictory; in some systems neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, in others they are activatory or present antigen directly. Published protocols modelling these interactions in vitro do not reflect the full range of interactions found in vivo; they do not examine how activated and naïve T cells differentially respond to neutrophils, or whether de-granulating or resting neutrophils induce different outcomes. Here, we established a culture protocol to ask these questions with human T cells and autologous neutrophils. We find that resting neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, activation and cytokine production but that de-granulating neutrophils do not, and neutrophil-released intracellular contents enhance proliferation. Strikingly, we also demonstrate that T cells early in the activation process are susceptible to suppression by neutrophils, while later-stage T cells are not, and naïve T cells do not respond at all. Our protocol therefore allows nuanced analysis of the outcome of interaction of these cells and may explain the contradictory results observed previously. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80423762021-04-14 The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types Minns, Danielle Smith, Katie J. Hardisty, Gareth Rossi, Adriano G. Gwyer Findlay, Emily Front Immunol Immunology Neutrophils and T cells exist in close proximity in lymph nodes and inflamed tissues during health and disease. They are able to form stable interactions, with profound effects on the phenotype and function of the T cells. However, the outcome of these effects are frequently contradictory; in some systems neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, in others they are activatory or present antigen directly. Published protocols modelling these interactions in vitro do not reflect the full range of interactions found in vivo; they do not examine how activated and naïve T cells differentially respond to neutrophils, or whether de-granulating or resting neutrophils induce different outcomes. Here, we established a culture protocol to ask these questions with human T cells and autologous neutrophils. We find that resting neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, activation and cytokine production but that de-granulating neutrophils do not, and neutrophil-released intracellular contents enhance proliferation. Strikingly, we also demonstrate that T cells early in the activation process are susceptible to suppression by neutrophils, while later-stage T cells are not, and naïve T cells do not respond at all. Our protocol therefore allows nuanced analysis of the outcome of interaction of these cells and may explain the contradictory results observed previously. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8042376/ /pubmed/33859639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633486 Text en Copyright © 2021 Minns, Smith, Hardisty, Rossi and Gwyer Findlay https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Minns, Danielle Smith, Katie J. Hardisty, Gareth Rossi, Adriano G. Gwyer Findlay, Emily The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types |
title | The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types |
title_full | The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types |
title_fullStr | The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types |
title_full_unstemmed | The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types |
title_short | The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types |
title_sort | outcome of neutrophil-t cell contact differs depending on activation status of both cell types |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633486 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minnsdanielle theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT smithkatiej theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT hardistygareth theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT rossiadrianog theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT gwyerfindlayemily theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT minnsdanielle outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT smithkatiej outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT hardistygareth outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT rossiadrianog outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes AT gwyerfindlayemily outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes |