Cargando…

The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types

Neutrophils and T cells exist in close proximity in lymph nodes and inflamed tissues during health and disease. They are able to form stable interactions, with profound effects on the phenotype and function of the T cells. However, the outcome of these effects are frequently contradictory; in some s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minns, Danielle, Smith, Katie J., Hardisty, Gareth, Rossi, Adriano G., Gwyer Findlay, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633486
_version_ 1783678114388246528
author Minns, Danielle
Smith, Katie J.
Hardisty, Gareth
Rossi, Adriano G.
Gwyer Findlay, Emily
author_facet Minns, Danielle
Smith, Katie J.
Hardisty, Gareth
Rossi, Adriano G.
Gwyer Findlay, Emily
author_sort Minns, Danielle
collection PubMed
description Neutrophils and T cells exist in close proximity in lymph nodes and inflamed tissues during health and disease. They are able to form stable interactions, with profound effects on the phenotype and function of the T cells. However, the outcome of these effects are frequently contradictory; in some systems neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, in others they are activatory or present antigen directly. Published protocols modelling these interactions in vitro do not reflect the full range of interactions found in vivo; they do not examine how activated and naïve T cells differentially respond to neutrophils, or whether de-granulating or resting neutrophils induce different outcomes. Here, we established a culture protocol to ask these questions with human T cells and autologous neutrophils. We find that resting neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, activation and cytokine production but that de-granulating neutrophils do not, and neutrophil-released intracellular contents enhance proliferation. Strikingly, we also demonstrate that T cells early in the activation process are susceptible to suppression by neutrophils, while later-stage T cells are not, and naïve T cells do not respond at all. Our protocol therefore allows nuanced analysis of the outcome of interaction of these cells and may explain the contradictory results observed previously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8042376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80423762021-04-14 The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types Minns, Danielle Smith, Katie J. Hardisty, Gareth Rossi, Adriano G. Gwyer Findlay, Emily Front Immunol Immunology Neutrophils and T cells exist in close proximity in lymph nodes and inflamed tissues during health and disease. They are able to form stable interactions, with profound effects on the phenotype and function of the T cells. However, the outcome of these effects are frequently contradictory; in some systems neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, in others they are activatory or present antigen directly. Published protocols modelling these interactions in vitro do not reflect the full range of interactions found in vivo; they do not examine how activated and naïve T cells differentially respond to neutrophils, or whether de-granulating or resting neutrophils induce different outcomes. Here, we established a culture protocol to ask these questions with human T cells and autologous neutrophils. We find that resting neutrophils suppress T cell proliferation, activation and cytokine production but that de-granulating neutrophils do not, and neutrophil-released intracellular contents enhance proliferation. Strikingly, we also demonstrate that T cells early in the activation process are susceptible to suppression by neutrophils, while later-stage T cells are not, and naïve T cells do not respond at all. Our protocol therefore allows nuanced analysis of the outcome of interaction of these cells and may explain the contradictory results observed previously. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8042376/ /pubmed/33859639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633486 Text en Copyright © 2021 Minns, Smith, Hardisty, Rossi and Gwyer Findlay https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Minns, Danielle
Smith, Katie J.
Hardisty, Gareth
Rossi, Adriano G.
Gwyer Findlay, Emily
The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types
title The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types
title_full The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types
title_fullStr The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types
title_full_unstemmed The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types
title_short The Outcome of Neutrophil-T Cell Contact Differs Depending on Activation Status of Both Cell Types
title_sort outcome of neutrophil-t cell contact differs depending on activation status of both cell types
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33859639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633486
work_keys_str_mv AT minnsdanielle theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT smithkatiej theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT hardistygareth theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT rossiadrianog theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT gwyerfindlayemily theoutcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT minnsdanielle outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT smithkatiej outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT hardistygareth outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT rossiadrianog outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes
AT gwyerfindlayemily outcomeofneutrophiltcellcontactdiffersdependingonactivationstatusofbothcelltypes