Cargando…
Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy
Stage IIIC is the most common stage of locally advanced sub-stage of endometrial cancer, nevertheless, the optimal management for these patients remains controversial. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone more effectively suppressed distant metastases but resulted in a higher rate of pelvic failure, while ad...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100754 |
_version_ | 1783678126194163712 |
---|---|
author | Buras, Andrea L. Mallen, Adrianne Wenham, Robert Montejo, Michael |
author_facet | Buras, Andrea L. Mallen, Adrianne Wenham, Robert Montejo, Michael |
author_sort | Buras, Andrea L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stage IIIC is the most common stage of locally advanced sub-stage of endometrial cancer, nevertheless, the optimal management for these patients remains controversial. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone more effectively suppressed distant metastases but resulted in a higher rate of pelvic failure, while adjuvant radiation more effectively controlled pelvic recurrences but was associated with more frequent distant metastases. Two recent randomized trials, PORTEC3 and GOG 258, each have attempted to integrate multimodal therapy. However, heterogeneous cohorts analyzed together, including high risk stage I, stage III and stage IV, limit our ability to make conclusions specific to stage IIIC disease. Here, we review clinical evidence pertaining to management and outcomes with stage IIIC uterine carcinoma with brief discussion on evolving approaches. The studies reviewed demonstrate for stage IIIC disease radiation improves local control but does not confer an overall survival benefit and chemotherapy can improve overall survival. The data seem to suggest that aside from the possibility of defining subgroups that may confer an overall survival benefit from combined modality therapy, the future to improving survival lies in the exploration of better therapeutic regimens that will result from tailored biomarker-based therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80424292021-04-16 Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy Buras, Andrea L. Mallen, Adrianne Wenham, Robert Montejo, Michael Gynecol Oncol Rep Review Article Stage IIIC is the most common stage of locally advanced sub-stage of endometrial cancer, nevertheless, the optimal management for these patients remains controversial. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone more effectively suppressed distant metastases but resulted in a higher rate of pelvic failure, while adjuvant radiation more effectively controlled pelvic recurrences but was associated with more frequent distant metastases. Two recent randomized trials, PORTEC3 and GOG 258, each have attempted to integrate multimodal therapy. However, heterogeneous cohorts analyzed together, including high risk stage I, stage III and stage IV, limit our ability to make conclusions specific to stage IIIC disease. Here, we review clinical evidence pertaining to management and outcomes with stage IIIC uterine carcinoma with brief discussion on evolving approaches. The studies reviewed demonstrate for stage IIIC disease radiation improves local control but does not confer an overall survival benefit and chemotherapy can improve overall survival. The data seem to suggest that aside from the possibility of defining subgroups that may confer an overall survival benefit from combined modality therapy, the future to improving survival lies in the exploration of better therapeutic regimens that will result from tailored biomarker-based therapy. Elsevier 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8042429/ /pubmed/33869712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100754 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Buras, Andrea L. Mallen, Adrianne Wenham, Robert Montejo, Michael Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy |
title | Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy |
title_full | Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy |
title_fullStr | Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy |
title_short | Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy |
title_sort | stage iiic endometrial cancer review: current controversies in adjuvant therapy |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burasandreal stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy AT mallenadrianne stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy AT wenhamrobert stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy AT montejomichael stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy |