Cargando…

Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy

Stage IIIC is the most common stage of locally advanced sub-stage of endometrial cancer, nevertheless, the optimal management for these patients remains controversial. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone more effectively suppressed distant metastases but resulted in a higher rate of pelvic failure, while ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buras, Andrea L., Mallen, Adrianne, Wenham, Robert, Montejo, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100754
_version_ 1783678126194163712
author Buras, Andrea L.
Mallen, Adrianne
Wenham, Robert
Montejo, Michael
author_facet Buras, Andrea L.
Mallen, Adrianne
Wenham, Robert
Montejo, Michael
author_sort Buras, Andrea L.
collection PubMed
description Stage IIIC is the most common stage of locally advanced sub-stage of endometrial cancer, nevertheless, the optimal management for these patients remains controversial. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone more effectively suppressed distant metastases but resulted in a higher rate of pelvic failure, while adjuvant radiation more effectively controlled pelvic recurrences but was associated with more frequent distant metastases. Two recent randomized trials, PORTEC3 and GOG 258, each have attempted to integrate multimodal therapy. However, heterogeneous cohorts analyzed together, including high risk stage I, stage III and stage IV, limit our ability to make conclusions specific to stage IIIC disease. Here, we review clinical evidence pertaining to management and outcomes with stage IIIC uterine carcinoma with brief discussion on evolving approaches. The studies reviewed demonstrate for stage IIIC disease radiation improves local control but does not confer an overall survival benefit and chemotherapy can improve overall survival. The data seem to suggest that aside from the possibility of defining subgroups that may confer an overall survival benefit from combined modality therapy, the future to improving survival lies in the exploration of better therapeutic regimens that will result from tailored biomarker-based therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8042429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80424292021-04-16 Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy Buras, Andrea L. Mallen, Adrianne Wenham, Robert Montejo, Michael Gynecol Oncol Rep Review Article Stage IIIC is the most common stage of locally advanced sub-stage of endometrial cancer, nevertheless, the optimal management for these patients remains controversial. Adjuvant chemotherapy alone more effectively suppressed distant metastases but resulted in a higher rate of pelvic failure, while adjuvant radiation more effectively controlled pelvic recurrences but was associated with more frequent distant metastases. Two recent randomized trials, PORTEC3 and GOG 258, each have attempted to integrate multimodal therapy. However, heterogeneous cohorts analyzed together, including high risk stage I, stage III and stage IV, limit our ability to make conclusions specific to stage IIIC disease. Here, we review clinical evidence pertaining to management and outcomes with stage IIIC uterine carcinoma with brief discussion on evolving approaches. The studies reviewed demonstrate for stage IIIC disease radiation improves local control but does not confer an overall survival benefit and chemotherapy can improve overall survival. The data seem to suggest that aside from the possibility of defining subgroups that may confer an overall survival benefit from combined modality therapy, the future to improving survival lies in the exploration of better therapeutic regimens that will result from tailored biomarker-based therapy. Elsevier 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8042429/ /pubmed/33869712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100754 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Buras, Andrea L.
Mallen, Adrianne
Wenham, Robert
Montejo, Michael
Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy
title Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy
title_full Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy
title_fullStr Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy
title_full_unstemmed Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy
title_short Stage IIIC endometrial cancer review: Current controversies in adjuvant therapy
title_sort stage iiic endometrial cancer review: current controversies in adjuvant therapy
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33869712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100754
work_keys_str_mv AT burasandreal stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy
AT mallenadrianne stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy
AT wenhamrobert stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy
AT montejomichael stageiiicendometrialcancerreviewcurrentcontroversiesinadjuvanttherapy