Cargando…
Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
We evaluated the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. We applied both tests to patients who were about to be hospitalized, had visited an emergency room, or had been admitte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33847084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e101 |
_version_ | 1783678137896271872 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Sang-Min Jeong, Hyeonju Chang, Euijin Choe, Pyoeng Gyun Kang, Chang Kyung Park, Wan Beom Kim, Taek Soo Kwon, Woon Yong Oh, Myoung-Don Kim, Nam Joong |
author_facet | Oh, Sang-Min Jeong, Hyeonju Chang, Euijin Choe, Pyoeng Gyun Kang, Chang Kyung Park, Wan Beom Kim, Taek Soo Kwon, Woon Yong Oh, Myoung-Don Kim, Nam Joong |
author_sort | Oh, Sang-Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. We applied both tests to patients who were about to be hospitalized, had visited an emergency room, or had been admitted due to COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR. Two nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained; one was tested by RT-PCR and the other by the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test. A total of 118 pairs of tests from 98 patients were performed between January 5 and 11, 2021. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test compared to RT-PCR were 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8–32.0%) and 100% (95% CI, 95.3–100.0%). Analysis of the results using RT-PCR cycle thresholds of ≤ 30 or ≤ 25 increased the sensitivity to 26.9% (95% CI, 13.7–46.1%), and 41.1% (95% CI, 21.6–64.0%), respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80424802021-04-20 Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Oh, Sang-Min Jeong, Hyeonju Chang, Euijin Choe, Pyoeng Gyun Kang, Chang Kyung Park, Wan Beom Kim, Taek Soo Kwon, Woon Yong Oh, Myoung-Don Kim, Nam Joong J Korean Med Sci Brief Communication We evaluated the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. We applied both tests to patients who were about to be hospitalized, had visited an emergency room, or had been admitted due to COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR. Two nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained; one was tested by RT-PCR and the other by the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test. A total of 118 pairs of tests from 98 patients were performed between January 5 and 11, 2021. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test compared to RT-PCR were 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8–32.0%) and 100% (95% CI, 95.3–100.0%). Analysis of the results using RT-PCR cycle thresholds of ≤ 30 or ≤ 25 increased the sensitivity to 26.9% (95% CI, 13.7–46.1%), and 41.1% (95% CI, 21.6–64.0%), respectively. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8042480/ /pubmed/33847084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e101 Text en © 2021 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Oh, Sang-Min Jeong, Hyeonju Chang, Euijin Choe, Pyoeng Gyun Kang, Chang Kyung Park, Wan Beom Kim, Taek Soo Kwon, Woon Yong Oh, Myoung-Don Kim, Nam Joong Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection |
title | Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection |
title_full | Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection |
title_fullStr | Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection |
title_short | Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection |
title_sort | clinical application of the standard q covid-19 ag test for the detection of sars-cov-2 infection |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33847084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohsangmin clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT jeonghyeonju clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT changeuijin clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT choepyoenggyun clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT kangchangkyung clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT parkwanbeom clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT kimtaeksoo clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT kwonwoonyong clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT ohmyoungdon clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection AT kimnamjoong clinicalapplicationofthestandardqcovid19agtestforthedetectionofsarscov2infection |