Cargando…

Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Pain assessment in brain-injured patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and existing scales may not be representative of behavioral reactions expressed by this specific group. This study aimed to validate the French-Canadian and English revised versions of the Critical-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gélinas, Céline, Bérubé, Mélanie, Puntillo, Kathleen A., Boitor, Madalina, Richard-Lalonde, Melissa, Bernard, Francis, Williams, Virginie, Joffe, Aaron M., Steiner, Craig, Marsh, Rebekah, Rose, Louise, Dale, Craig M., Tsoller, Darina M., Choinière, Manon, Streiner, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1
_version_ 1783678157152321536
author Gélinas, Céline
Bérubé, Mélanie
Puntillo, Kathleen A.
Boitor, Madalina
Richard-Lalonde, Melissa
Bernard, Francis
Williams, Virginie
Joffe, Aaron M.
Steiner, Craig
Marsh, Rebekah
Rose, Louise
Dale, Craig M.
Tsoller, Darina M.
Choinière, Manon
Streiner, David L.
author_facet Gélinas, Céline
Bérubé, Mélanie
Puntillo, Kathleen A.
Boitor, Madalina
Richard-Lalonde, Melissa
Bernard, Francis
Williams, Virginie
Joffe, Aaron M.
Steiner, Craig
Marsh, Rebekah
Rose, Louise
Dale, Craig M.
Tsoller, Darina M.
Choinière, Manon
Streiner, David L.
author_sort Gélinas, Céline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain assessment in brain-injured patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and existing scales may not be representative of behavioral reactions expressed by this specific group. This study aimed to validate the French-Canadian and English revised versions of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT-Neuro) for brain-injured ICU patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in three Canadian and one American sites. Patients with a traumatic or a non-traumatic brain injury were assessed with the CPOT-Neuro by trained raters (i.e., research staff and ICU nurses) before, during, and after nociceptive procedures (i.e., turning and other) and non-nociceptive procedures (i.e., non-invasive blood pressure, soft touch). Patients who were conscious and delirium-free were asked to provide their self-report of pain intensity (0–10). A first data set was completed for all participants (n = 226), and a second data set (n = 87) was obtained when a change in the level of consciousness (LOC) was observed after study enrollment. Three LOC groups were included: (a) unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale or GCS 4–8); (b) altered LOC (GCS 9–12); and (c) conscious (GCS 13–15). RESULTS: Higher CPOT-Neuro scores were found during nociceptive procedures compared to rest and non-nociceptive procedures in both data sets (p < 0.001). CPOT-Neuro scores were not different across LOC groups. Moderate correlations between CPOT-Neuro and self-reported pain intensity scores were found at rest and during nociceptive procedures (Spearman rho > 0.40 and > 0.60, respectively). CPOT-Neuro cut-off scores ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 were found to adequately classify mild to severe self-reported pain ≥ 1 and moderate to severe self-reported pain ≥ 5, respectively. Interrater reliability of raters’ CPOT-Neuro scores was supported with intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: The CPOT-Neuro was found to be valid in this multi-site sample of brain-injured ICU patients at various LOC. Implementation studies are necessary to evaluate the tool’s performance in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8042624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80426242021-04-13 Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study Gélinas, Céline Bérubé, Mélanie Puntillo, Kathleen A. Boitor, Madalina Richard-Lalonde, Melissa Bernard, Francis Williams, Virginie Joffe, Aaron M. Steiner, Craig Marsh, Rebekah Rose, Louise Dale, Craig M. Tsoller, Darina M. Choinière, Manon Streiner, David L. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Pain assessment in brain-injured patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and existing scales may not be representative of behavioral reactions expressed by this specific group. This study aimed to validate the French-Canadian and English revised versions of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT-Neuro) for brain-injured ICU patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in three Canadian and one American sites. Patients with a traumatic or a non-traumatic brain injury were assessed with the CPOT-Neuro by trained raters (i.e., research staff and ICU nurses) before, during, and after nociceptive procedures (i.e., turning and other) and non-nociceptive procedures (i.e., non-invasive blood pressure, soft touch). Patients who were conscious and delirium-free were asked to provide their self-report of pain intensity (0–10). A first data set was completed for all participants (n = 226), and a second data set (n = 87) was obtained when a change in the level of consciousness (LOC) was observed after study enrollment. Three LOC groups were included: (a) unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale or GCS 4–8); (b) altered LOC (GCS 9–12); and (c) conscious (GCS 13–15). RESULTS: Higher CPOT-Neuro scores were found during nociceptive procedures compared to rest and non-nociceptive procedures in both data sets (p < 0.001). CPOT-Neuro scores were not different across LOC groups. Moderate correlations between CPOT-Neuro and self-reported pain intensity scores were found at rest and during nociceptive procedures (Spearman rho > 0.40 and > 0.60, respectively). CPOT-Neuro cut-off scores ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 were found to adequately classify mild to severe self-reported pain ≥ 1 and moderate to severe self-reported pain ≥ 5, respectively. Interrater reliability of raters’ CPOT-Neuro scores was supported with intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: The CPOT-Neuro was found to be valid in this multi-site sample of brain-injured ICU patients at various LOC. Implementation studies are necessary to evaluate the tool’s performance in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8042624/ /pubmed/33849619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gélinas, Céline
Bérubé, Mélanie
Puntillo, Kathleen A.
Boitor, Madalina
Richard-Lalonde, Melissa
Bernard, Francis
Williams, Virginie
Joffe, Aaron M.
Steiner, Craig
Marsh, Rebekah
Rose, Louise
Dale, Craig M.
Tsoller, Darina M.
Choinière, Manon
Streiner, David L.
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
title Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
title_full Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
title_short Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
title_sort validation of the critical-care pain observation tool-neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gelinasceline validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT berubemelanie validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT puntillokathleena validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT boitormadalina validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT richardlalondemelissa validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT bernardfrancis validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT williamsvirginie validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT joffeaaronm validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT steinercraig validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT marshrebekah validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT roselouise validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT dalecraigm validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT tsollerdarinam validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT choinieremanon validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy
AT streinerdavidl validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy