Cargando…
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Pain assessment in brain-injured patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and existing scales may not be representative of behavioral reactions expressed by this specific group. This study aimed to validate the French-Canadian and English revised versions of the Critical-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1 |
_version_ | 1783678157152321536 |
---|---|
author | Gélinas, Céline Bérubé, Mélanie Puntillo, Kathleen A. Boitor, Madalina Richard-Lalonde, Melissa Bernard, Francis Williams, Virginie Joffe, Aaron M. Steiner, Craig Marsh, Rebekah Rose, Louise Dale, Craig M. Tsoller, Darina M. Choinière, Manon Streiner, David L. |
author_facet | Gélinas, Céline Bérubé, Mélanie Puntillo, Kathleen A. Boitor, Madalina Richard-Lalonde, Melissa Bernard, Francis Williams, Virginie Joffe, Aaron M. Steiner, Craig Marsh, Rebekah Rose, Louise Dale, Craig M. Tsoller, Darina M. Choinière, Manon Streiner, David L. |
author_sort | Gélinas, Céline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pain assessment in brain-injured patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and existing scales may not be representative of behavioral reactions expressed by this specific group. This study aimed to validate the French-Canadian and English revised versions of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT-Neuro) for brain-injured ICU patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in three Canadian and one American sites. Patients with a traumatic or a non-traumatic brain injury were assessed with the CPOT-Neuro by trained raters (i.e., research staff and ICU nurses) before, during, and after nociceptive procedures (i.e., turning and other) and non-nociceptive procedures (i.e., non-invasive blood pressure, soft touch). Patients who were conscious and delirium-free were asked to provide their self-report of pain intensity (0–10). A first data set was completed for all participants (n = 226), and a second data set (n = 87) was obtained when a change in the level of consciousness (LOC) was observed after study enrollment. Three LOC groups were included: (a) unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale or GCS 4–8); (b) altered LOC (GCS 9–12); and (c) conscious (GCS 13–15). RESULTS: Higher CPOT-Neuro scores were found during nociceptive procedures compared to rest and non-nociceptive procedures in both data sets (p < 0.001). CPOT-Neuro scores were not different across LOC groups. Moderate correlations between CPOT-Neuro and self-reported pain intensity scores were found at rest and during nociceptive procedures (Spearman rho > 0.40 and > 0.60, respectively). CPOT-Neuro cut-off scores ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 were found to adequately classify mild to severe self-reported pain ≥ 1 and moderate to severe self-reported pain ≥ 5, respectively. Interrater reliability of raters’ CPOT-Neuro scores was supported with intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: The CPOT-Neuro was found to be valid in this multi-site sample of brain-injured ICU patients at various LOC. Implementation studies are necessary to evaluate the tool’s performance in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80426242021-04-13 Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study Gélinas, Céline Bérubé, Mélanie Puntillo, Kathleen A. Boitor, Madalina Richard-Lalonde, Melissa Bernard, Francis Williams, Virginie Joffe, Aaron M. Steiner, Craig Marsh, Rebekah Rose, Louise Dale, Craig M. Tsoller, Darina M. Choinière, Manon Streiner, David L. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Pain assessment in brain-injured patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and existing scales may not be representative of behavioral reactions expressed by this specific group. This study aimed to validate the French-Canadian and English revised versions of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT-Neuro) for brain-injured ICU patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in three Canadian and one American sites. Patients with a traumatic or a non-traumatic brain injury were assessed with the CPOT-Neuro by trained raters (i.e., research staff and ICU nurses) before, during, and after nociceptive procedures (i.e., turning and other) and non-nociceptive procedures (i.e., non-invasive blood pressure, soft touch). Patients who were conscious and delirium-free were asked to provide their self-report of pain intensity (0–10). A first data set was completed for all participants (n = 226), and a second data set (n = 87) was obtained when a change in the level of consciousness (LOC) was observed after study enrollment. Three LOC groups were included: (a) unconscious (Glasgow Coma Scale or GCS 4–8); (b) altered LOC (GCS 9–12); and (c) conscious (GCS 13–15). RESULTS: Higher CPOT-Neuro scores were found during nociceptive procedures compared to rest and non-nociceptive procedures in both data sets (p < 0.001). CPOT-Neuro scores were not different across LOC groups. Moderate correlations between CPOT-Neuro and self-reported pain intensity scores were found at rest and during nociceptive procedures (Spearman rho > 0.40 and > 0.60, respectively). CPOT-Neuro cut-off scores ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 were found to adequately classify mild to severe self-reported pain ≥ 1 and moderate to severe self-reported pain ≥ 5, respectively. Interrater reliability of raters’ CPOT-Neuro scores was supported with intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.69. CONCLUSIONS: The CPOT-Neuro was found to be valid in this multi-site sample of brain-injured ICU patients at various LOC. Implementation studies are necessary to evaluate the tool’s performance in clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8042624/ /pubmed/33849619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gélinas, Céline Bérubé, Mélanie Puntillo, Kathleen A. Boitor, Madalina Richard-Lalonde, Melissa Bernard, Francis Williams, Virginie Joffe, Aaron M. Steiner, Craig Marsh, Rebekah Rose, Louise Dale, Craig M. Tsoller, Darina M. Choinière, Manon Streiner, David L. Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
title | Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | validation of the critical-care pain observation tool-neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gelinasceline validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT berubemelanie validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT puntillokathleena validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT boitormadalina validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT richardlalondemelissa validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT bernardfrancis validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT williamsvirginie validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT joffeaaronm validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT steinercraig validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT marshrebekah validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT roselouise validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT dalecraigm validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT tsollerdarinam validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT choinieremanon validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT streinerdavidl validationofthecriticalcarepainobservationtoolneuroinbraininjuredadultsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy |