Cargando…
A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping
There is a large body of evidence demonstrating that delaying clamping of the umbilical cord provides benefits for term and preterm infants. These benefits include reductions in mortality in preterm infants and improved developmental scores at 4 years of age in term infants. However, non-breathing o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01052-3 |
_version_ | 1783678200209997824 |
---|---|
author | Katheria, Anup Lee, Henry C. Knol, Ronny Irvine, Leigh Thomas, Sumesh |
author_facet | Katheria, Anup Lee, Henry C. Knol, Ronny Irvine, Leigh Thomas, Sumesh |
author_sort | Katheria, Anup |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a large body of evidence demonstrating that delaying clamping of the umbilical cord provides benefits for term and preterm infants. These benefits include reductions in mortality in preterm infants and improved developmental scores at 4 years of age in term infants. However, non-breathing or non-vigorous infants at birth are excluded due to the perceived need for immediate resuscitation. Recent studies have demonstrated early physiological benefits in both human and animal models if resuscitation is performed with an intact cord, but this is still an active area of research. Given the large number of ongoing and planned trials, we have brought together an international group that have been intimately involved in the development or use of resuscitation equipment designed to be used while the cord is still intact. In this review, we will present the benefits and limitations of devices that have been developed or are in use. Published trials or ongoing studies using their respective devices will also be reviewed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80428402021-04-13 A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping Katheria, Anup Lee, Henry C. Knol, Ronny Irvine, Leigh Thomas, Sumesh J Perinatol Review Article There is a large body of evidence demonstrating that delaying clamping of the umbilical cord provides benefits for term and preterm infants. These benefits include reductions in mortality in preterm infants and improved developmental scores at 4 years of age in term infants. However, non-breathing or non-vigorous infants at birth are excluded due to the perceived need for immediate resuscitation. Recent studies have demonstrated early physiological benefits in both human and animal models if resuscitation is performed with an intact cord, but this is still an active area of research. Given the large number of ongoing and planned trials, we have brought together an international group that have been intimately involved in the development or use of resuscitation equipment designed to be used while the cord is still intact. In this review, we will present the benefits and limitations of devices that have been developed or are in use. Published trials or ongoing studies using their respective devices will also be reviewed. Nature Publishing Group US 2021-04-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8042840/ /pubmed/33850283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01052-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Katheria, Anup Lee, Henry C. Knol, Ronny Irvine, Leigh Thomas, Sumesh A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping |
title | A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping |
title_full | A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping |
title_fullStr | A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping |
title_short | A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping |
title_sort | review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01052-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katheriaanup areviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT leehenryc areviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT knolronny areviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT irvineleigh areviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT thomassumesh areviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT katheriaanup reviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT leehenryc reviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT knolronny reviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT irvineleigh reviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping AT thomassumesh reviewofdifferentresuscitationplatformsduringdelayedcordclamping |