Cargando…
Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis
BACKGROUND: With innovation in service delivery increasingly viewed as crucial to the long-term sustainability of health systems, NHS England launched an ambitious new model of care (Vanguard) programme in 2015. Supported by a £350 million transformation fund, 50 Vanguard sites were to act as pilots...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00711-3 |
_version_ | 1783678204727263232 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Paul Billings, Jenny MacInnes, Julie Mikelyte, Rasa Welch, Elizabeth Checkland, Kath |
author_facet | Wilson, Paul Billings, Jenny MacInnes, Julie Mikelyte, Rasa Welch, Elizabeth Checkland, Kath |
author_sort | Wilson, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With innovation in service delivery increasingly viewed as crucial to the long-term sustainability of health systems, NHS England launched an ambitious new model of care (Vanguard) programme in 2015. Supported by a £350 million transformation fund, 50 Vanguard sites were to act as pilots for innovation in service delivery, to move quickly to change the way that services were delivered, breaking down barriers between sectors and improving the coordination and delivery of care. METHODS: As part of a national evaluation of the Vanguard programme, we conducted an evidence synthesis to assess the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations. With access to a secure, online hub used by the Vanguard and other integrated care initiatives, two researchers retrieved any documents from a locally commissioned evaluation for inclusion. All identified documents were downloaded and logged, and details of the evaluators, questions, methodological approaches and limitations in design and/or reporting were extracted. As included evaluations varied in nature and type, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: We identified a total of 115 separate reports relating to the locally commissioned evaluations. Five prominent issues relating to evaluation conduct were identified across included reports: use of logic models, number and type of evaluation questions posed, data sharing and information governance, methodological challenges and evaluation reporting in general. A combination of resource, data and time constraints means that evaluations often attempted to but did not fully address the wide range of questions posed by individual Vanguards. CONCLUSIONS: Significant investment was made in independent local evaluations of the Vanguard programme by NHS England. This synthesis represents the only comprehensive attempt to capture methodological learning and may serve as a key resource for researchers and policy-makers seeking to understand investigating large-scale system change, both within the NHS and internationally. PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42017069282). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00711-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80428622021-04-14 Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis Wilson, Paul Billings, Jenny MacInnes, Julie Mikelyte, Rasa Welch, Elizabeth Checkland, Kath Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: With innovation in service delivery increasingly viewed as crucial to the long-term sustainability of health systems, NHS England launched an ambitious new model of care (Vanguard) programme in 2015. Supported by a £350 million transformation fund, 50 Vanguard sites were to act as pilots for innovation in service delivery, to move quickly to change the way that services were delivered, breaking down barriers between sectors and improving the coordination and delivery of care. METHODS: As part of a national evaluation of the Vanguard programme, we conducted an evidence synthesis to assess the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations. With access to a secure, online hub used by the Vanguard and other integrated care initiatives, two researchers retrieved any documents from a locally commissioned evaluation for inclusion. All identified documents were downloaded and logged, and details of the evaluators, questions, methodological approaches and limitations in design and/or reporting were extracted. As included evaluations varied in nature and type, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: We identified a total of 115 separate reports relating to the locally commissioned evaluations. Five prominent issues relating to evaluation conduct were identified across included reports: use of logic models, number and type of evaluation questions posed, data sharing and information governance, methodological challenges and evaluation reporting in general. A combination of resource, data and time constraints means that evaluations often attempted to but did not fully address the wide range of questions posed by individual Vanguards. CONCLUSIONS: Significant investment was made in independent local evaluations of the Vanguard programme by NHS England. This synthesis represents the only comprehensive attempt to capture methodological learning and may serve as a key resource for researchers and policy-makers seeking to understand investigating large-scale system change, both within the NHS and internationally. PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42017069282). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00711-3. BioMed Central 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8042862/ /pubmed/33845858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00711-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Wilson, Paul Billings, Jenny MacInnes, Julie Mikelyte, Rasa Welch, Elizabeth Checkland, Kath Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis |
title | Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis |
title_full | Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis |
title_fullStr | Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis |
title_short | Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis |
title_sort | investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the nhs vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33845858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00711-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonpaul investigatingthenatureandqualityoflocallycommissionedevaluationsofthenhsvanguardprogrammeanevidencesynthesis AT billingsjenny investigatingthenatureandqualityoflocallycommissionedevaluationsofthenhsvanguardprogrammeanevidencesynthesis AT macinnesjulie investigatingthenatureandqualityoflocallycommissionedevaluationsofthenhsvanguardprogrammeanevidencesynthesis AT mikelyterasa investigatingthenatureandqualityoflocallycommissionedevaluationsofthenhsvanguardprogrammeanevidencesynthesis AT welchelizabeth investigatingthenatureandqualityoflocallycommissionedevaluationsofthenhsvanguardprogrammeanevidencesynthesis AT checklandkath investigatingthenatureandqualityoflocallycommissionedevaluationsofthenhsvanguardprogrammeanevidencesynthesis |