Cargando…

Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study

BACKGROUND: An intractable plantar keratoma (IPK) is a conical thickening of the epidermis’ stratum corneum and a common cause of foot pain which can have a significant, detrimental impact on the mobility, quality of life and independence of individuals. Conservative treatments are currently offered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mercier, Marie-Philippe, Blanchette, Virginie, Cantin, Vincent, Brousseau-Foley, Magali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7
_version_ 1783678219580342272
author Mercier, Marie-Philippe
Blanchette, Virginie
Cantin, Vincent
Brousseau-Foley, Magali
author_facet Mercier, Marie-Philippe
Blanchette, Virginie
Cantin, Vincent
Brousseau-Foley, Magali
author_sort Mercier, Marie-Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An intractable plantar keratoma (IPK) is a conical thickening of the epidermis’ stratum corneum and a common cause of foot pain which can have a significant, detrimental impact on the mobility, quality of life and independence of individuals. Conservative treatments are currently offered to patients with IPK, but they are unsatisfactory since they do not offer a sufficient or permanent reduction of symptoms. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of innovative treatments for intractable plantar keratoma (IPK). METHODS: A randomized single blind trial with 40 patients divided with block randomization in four parallel groups was conducted to compare treatment combinations: conservative sharp debridement only or sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological water injection or lidocaine injection. All patients obtained the same treatment four times at a four-week interval. At each visit, visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI) and IPK size were evaluated. VAS and FFI were also completed at a six and twelve-month follow-up. RESULTS: Our findings in regards to feasibility demonstrated recruitment challenges because of the anticipated pain that would be provoked by needle insertion may not be worth the potential pain relief compared to debridement alone from the patient’s perspective. This was also the principal cause of drop out. Our preliminary results show no main effect of group for any of the clinical outcomes: pain felt on VAS, FFI score, IPK’s size (p > 0.05). However, the analysis revealed a statistically significant effect of time on VAS (p < 0.001), FFI score (p < 0.001) and IPK’s size (width and depth (p < 0.001); length (p = 0.001)), but no group x time interaction was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that IPK treatment consisting of sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological saline water injection or lidocaine injection is feasible and safe. There was a non-statistically significant trend toward diminishing pain intensity compared to scalpel debridement alone. The pain provoked by needle insertion and injection treatments must be addressed with a scientifically proven protocol to make it more comfortable for patients before these treatments could be considered in further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04777227. 2 March, 2021 - Retrospectively registered (All participants were recruited prior to registration). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8042939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80429392021-04-14 Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study Mercier, Marie-Philippe Blanchette, Virginie Cantin, Vincent Brousseau-Foley, Magali J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: An intractable plantar keratoma (IPK) is a conical thickening of the epidermis’ stratum corneum and a common cause of foot pain which can have a significant, detrimental impact on the mobility, quality of life and independence of individuals. Conservative treatments are currently offered to patients with IPK, but they are unsatisfactory since they do not offer a sufficient or permanent reduction of symptoms. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of innovative treatments for intractable plantar keratoma (IPK). METHODS: A randomized single blind trial with 40 patients divided with block randomization in four parallel groups was conducted to compare treatment combinations: conservative sharp debridement only or sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological water injection or lidocaine injection. All patients obtained the same treatment four times at a four-week interval. At each visit, visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI) and IPK size were evaluated. VAS and FFI were also completed at a six and twelve-month follow-up. RESULTS: Our findings in regards to feasibility demonstrated recruitment challenges because of the anticipated pain that would be provoked by needle insertion may not be worth the potential pain relief compared to debridement alone from the patient’s perspective. This was also the principal cause of drop out. Our preliminary results show no main effect of group for any of the clinical outcomes: pain felt on VAS, FFI score, IPK’s size (p > 0.05). However, the analysis revealed a statistically significant effect of time on VAS (p < 0.001), FFI score (p < 0.001) and IPK’s size (width and depth (p < 0.001); length (p = 0.001)), but no group x time interaction was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that IPK treatment consisting of sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological saline water injection or lidocaine injection is feasible and safe. There was a non-statistically significant trend toward diminishing pain intensity compared to scalpel debridement alone. The pain provoked by needle insertion and injection treatments must be addressed with a scientifically proven protocol to make it more comfortable for patients before these treatments could be considered in further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04777227. 2 March, 2021 - Retrospectively registered (All participants were recruited prior to registration). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8042939/ /pubmed/33849632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mercier, Marie-Philippe
Blanchette, Virginie
Cantin, Vincent
Brousseau-Foley, Magali
Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
title Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
title_full Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
title_short Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
title_sort effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7
work_keys_str_mv AT merciermariephilippe effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT blanchettevirginie effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT cantinvincent effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy
AT brousseaufoleymagali effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy