Cargando…
Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study
BACKGROUND: An intractable plantar keratoma (IPK) is a conical thickening of the epidermis’ stratum corneum and a common cause of foot pain which can have a significant, detrimental impact on the mobility, quality of life and independence of individuals. Conservative treatments are currently offered...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7 |
_version_ | 1783678219580342272 |
---|---|
author | Mercier, Marie-Philippe Blanchette, Virginie Cantin, Vincent Brousseau-Foley, Magali |
author_facet | Mercier, Marie-Philippe Blanchette, Virginie Cantin, Vincent Brousseau-Foley, Magali |
author_sort | Mercier, Marie-Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An intractable plantar keratoma (IPK) is a conical thickening of the epidermis’ stratum corneum and a common cause of foot pain which can have a significant, detrimental impact on the mobility, quality of life and independence of individuals. Conservative treatments are currently offered to patients with IPK, but they are unsatisfactory since they do not offer a sufficient or permanent reduction of symptoms. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of innovative treatments for intractable plantar keratoma (IPK). METHODS: A randomized single blind trial with 40 patients divided with block randomization in four parallel groups was conducted to compare treatment combinations: conservative sharp debridement only or sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological water injection or lidocaine injection. All patients obtained the same treatment four times at a four-week interval. At each visit, visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI) and IPK size were evaluated. VAS and FFI were also completed at a six and twelve-month follow-up. RESULTS: Our findings in regards to feasibility demonstrated recruitment challenges because of the anticipated pain that would be provoked by needle insertion may not be worth the potential pain relief compared to debridement alone from the patient’s perspective. This was also the principal cause of drop out. Our preliminary results show no main effect of group for any of the clinical outcomes: pain felt on VAS, FFI score, IPK’s size (p > 0.05). However, the analysis revealed a statistically significant effect of time on VAS (p < 0.001), FFI score (p < 0.001) and IPK’s size (width and depth (p < 0.001); length (p = 0.001)), but no group x time interaction was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that IPK treatment consisting of sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological saline water injection or lidocaine injection is feasible and safe. There was a non-statistically significant trend toward diminishing pain intensity compared to scalpel debridement alone. The pain provoked by needle insertion and injection treatments must be addressed with a scientifically proven protocol to make it more comfortable for patients before these treatments could be considered in further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04777227. 2 March, 2021 - Retrospectively registered (All participants were recruited prior to registration). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8042939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80429392021-04-14 Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study Mercier, Marie-Philippe Blanchette, Virginie Cantin, Vincent Brousseau-Foley, Magali J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: An intractable plantar keratoma (IPK) is a conical thickening of the epidermis’ stratum corneum and a common cause of foot pain which can have a significant, detrimental impact on the mobility, quality of life and independence of individuals. Conservative treatments are currently offered to patients with IPK, but they are unsatisfactory since they do not offer a sufficient or permanent reduction of symptoms. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of innovative treatments for intractable plantar keratoma (IPK). METHODS: A randomized single blind trial with 40 patients divided with block randomization in four parallel groups was conducted to compare treatment combinations: conservative sharp debridement only or sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological water injection or lidocaine injection. All patients obtained the same treatment four times at a four-week interval. At each visit, visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI) and IPK size were evaluated. VAS and FFI were also completed at a six and twelve-month follow-up. RESULTS: Our findings in regards to feasibility demonstrated recruitment challenges because of the anticipated pain that would be provoked by needle insertion may not be worth the potential pain relief compared to debridement alone from the patient’s perspective. This was also the principal cause of drop out. Our preliminary results show no main effect of group for any of the clinical outcomes: pain felt on VAS, FFI score, IPK’s size (p > 0.05). However, the analysis revealed a statistically significant effect of time on VAS (p < 0.001), FFI score (p < 0.001) and IPK’s size (width and depth (p < 0.001); length (p = 0.001)), but no group x time interaction was found (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that IPK treatment consisting of sharp debridement with needle insertion, physiological saline water injection or lidocaine injection is feasible and safe. There was a non-statistically significant trend toward diminishing pain intensity compared to scalpel debridement alone. The pain provoked by needle insertion and injection treatments must be addressed with a scientifically proven protocol to make it more comfortable for patients before these treatments could be considered in further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04777227. 2 March, 2021 - Retrospectively registered (All participants were recruited prior to registration). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7. BioMed Central 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8042939/ /pubmed/33849632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mercier, Marie-Philippe Blanchette, Virginie Cantin, Vincent Brousseau-Foley, Magali Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study |
title | Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study |
title_full | Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study |
title_short | Effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study |
title_sort | effectiveness of saline water and lidocaine injection treatment of intractable plantar keratoma: a randomised feasibility study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33849632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-021-00467-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merciermariephilippe effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT blanchettevirginie effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT cantinvincent effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy AT brousseaufoleymagali effectivenessofsalinewaterandlidocaineinjectiontreatmentofintractableplantarkeratomaarandomisedfeasibilitystudy |